Saturday, September 30, 2006

An empty chamber?

Just when you thought there may be a judge or two left on the Wisconsin Supreme Court that could hear Congressman Mark Green's case trying to force our state to look the other way while he spends special interest dollars raised in Washington, D.C. that no one else can spend, the conflicts keep rolling in.

Kreitlow's clever ad

If you haven't seen it yet, check out Pat Kreitlow's ad called "Pat on the Trail" at the Wispolitics ad watch section. It's a pretty funny ad that touches on an issue I doubt Senator Dave Zien's constituents think is funny any longer.

Zien's steady diet of taxpayer dollars above his salary has grown to an outrageous sum. One year, with a $24,000 reimbursement just in mileage Zien pulled in more than $47,000 above his actual salary. (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 10/17/04)

Friday, September 29, 2006

It's going to be lonely at the top

If the Wisconsin State Supreme Court decides to take Congressman Green's case to stop the state of Wisconsin from enforcing campaign finance laws, the chamber may echo a bit during arguments because there are so few people in the room.

Justice Patience Roggensack would have to recuse herself from the case as well since Congressman Green wrote her campaign a check from his campaign account in 2002.

Maybe suing the state you want to be governor of wasn't such a hot idea...

What our nation is becoming

Go here to see a picture of the horrible methods our country is using on people in the so-called war on terror. If you don't think people will say anything, even if they have to make it up, just to stop this than you're just not be honest.

Our inspiration for these methods? Well, the photographs were taken by Jonah Blank last month at Tuol Sleng Prison in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The prison is now a museum that documents Khmer Rouge atrocities.


Hat tip: Pundit Nation

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Republicans for Jim Sullivan

This post shows why it is possible that Jim Sullivan will beat Senator Tom Reynolds in the 5th Senate District. Combine the thoughts outlined in this post from a Republican in Wauwatosa with the people that may skip voting in that race rather than voting for the crazy incumbent, and you can have a Democrat win that wins that seat.

Abramoff free until after election day

Whew! Jack Abramoff can stay out of prison until November 15th. Thank goodness or how else could he attend election night parties with all of his Republican friends?

Green misses abortion vote

So is Congressman Mark Green trying to avoid generating another story on how extreme he is on abortion rights or did he just not make it in time to vote for a bill that would make it a federal crime for aunts or even religious counselors to take a young girl that was raped by her father across state lines for an abortion?

Green missed that vote. But he did make a vote twenty minutes later.

Normally someone like Congressman Green would be first in line to make sure victims of incest are forced to ask the parent that raped them if they could get an abortion. This week he just couldn't get there in time.

Perhaps his plane was late and he submitted something into the Congressional Record saying how he voted. But perhaps there is something else at work. Wonder how the "pro-lifers" feel about him not making that vote...

Wilcox conflict has another layer

Supreme Court Justice Jon Wilcox's conflict of interest on a potential case regarding Congressman Mark Green's transfer of PAC money raised from Washington, D.C. based interests has an additional layer than the one discussed here yesterday. Congressman Green's lawyer knows Justice Wilcox pretty well.

Green's lawyer is Don Mills. He is a former State Elections Board (SEB) member and was the lead negotiator for the SEB in the settlement with Wilcox.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Dale Schultz's fantasy world

Wispolitics held a luncheon today with Senate Minority Leader Judy Robson and Senate Majority Leader Dale Schultz. And Schultz was really working hard to sell an alternative reality to what is going on in the state senate races.

At one point in the discussion Schultz said there is no chance that the Republicans would lose control on the state senate. After he said that, I hope everyone stopped listening to what he said. Come on, this is politics. There would be a chance even if the Democrats hadn't recruited good candidates who are doing well fundraising in this anti-incumbent Republican year. And if you can't admit that, you can't be honest about anything.

Robson didn't try to sell people on some pie in the sky absolute win for the Democrats. She said there is a better than fifty-fifty chance that the Democrats will take control. And she's right.

But now that I've heard right from Schultz's mouth that he can't even admit that this is a tough year for his caucus, other things that I've heard make more sense. The Republicans have been trying to tell people that Senator Dave Zien (R-any place I can get tax money for riding my motorcycle) is up by ten to twelve points. That doesn't wash with any other polls out there. That race is close and truth be told, Zien's opponent, Pat Kreitlow, is just slightly ahead. Even a dead heat at this point is great news for Kreitlow since outside groups have spent thousands on radio up there over the last few months trying to prop up Zien and no one has put up a negative ad against him.

The 21st Senate District has started to swing for Rep. John Lehman. Polling shows him up now that folks have gotten know his opponent, William McReynolds, a little better. And Lehman has moved ahead of McReynolds despite Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce (WMC) running negative ads against Lehman.

You can go here to see how the race for the 31st Senate District is going. Hint, it's not going well for Schultz's team. The Democrat, Kathleen Vinehout, is in a great position to beat Senator Ron Brown (R-Eau Claire).

The Senate Republicans had to raise a ton of money to defend Senator Joe Leibham's seat because he votes far more conservatively than his district. His opponent, Jamie Aulik, has a great story to tell and continues to raise money to get that story out there. The anti-incumbent Republican mood that is hovering over the entire country could be enough to overcome Leibham's money advantage in this race.

And even though by the numbers the 5th Senate District is Republican, Senator Tom Reynolds(R-West Allis) will be hard pressed to get enough voters in his district excited about helping him and many may just skip that race rather than vote for him. Jim Sullivan is doing well and raising enough to get his message out to voters.

The Senate Republicans have also finally taken notice that one of their senators only has about $16,000 in the bank and has a candidate really energizing a lot of people about his candidacy. At first I didn't believe that there was a poll suggesting Senator Alan Lasee (R-De Pere) was in trouble, but since his leader hasn't said anything true in a while and they scheduled a Madison fundraiser for him last night, I'm starting to believe. His opponent, Charlie Most, is the Door County Board Chairman and his hard work has got people talking in the 1st Senate District and in Madison.

No one was expecting Senator Schultz to say there is only about a fifty percent chance he will still be the leader next session. But an honest look at the facts out there suggests if he doesn't start giving assessments of the landscape that are at least based in reality a little bit, no one will believe anything he says.

Prosser and Wilcox must recuse themselves from Green case

As Congressman Mark Green prepares to continue his fight to spend PAC money raised from Washington, D.C. interests in his race to be Governor of Wisconsin, all eyes now turn to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. And there should be no doubt that Justices David Prosser and Jon Wilcox should recuse themselves from this case.

An article from the Wisconsin State Journal in 2003 during the Scott Jensen trial describes when a justice should remove themselves from a case:
Under the state's judicial ethics code, a judge is advised not to participate in a case if he or she has a personal bias or prejudice toward the defendant or if a reasonable person who knows all the facts could question the judge's impartiality.
So let's look at the facts.

Justice Prosser served in the state legislature with Congressman Green. In fact, they were part of a leadership team together. Prosser was the Speaker of the House while Green was the Caucus Chairman so it is reasonable to assume they had some sort of relationship during this time that would cause a bias one way or another. Prosser and three other justices did not participate in the Scott Jensen trial for the same reason.

And there is no one in politics today that would want to strip power from the Wisconsin Elections Board more than Justice Wilcox. In 2001, fines levied against Wilcox and his campaign team were the largest ever given out in state history. From the Wisconsin State Journal:
In settling a lawsuit filed by the state Elections Board, Wilcox agreed to pay $10,000 for his campaign committee. The lawsuit charged Wilcox's committee and his campaign manager, Mark Block, with colluding with another group to evade campaign finance laws in his 1997 race for the state's highest court.

Back then the Wisconsin State Journal asked the following in an editorial:
Former opponent Kelly and Mike McCabe, executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, have said Wilcox should resign his seat on the court. That's up for Wilcox to decide - and it may hinge on how effective he can be as a justice during the remaining six years of his 10-year term. For example, it's likely that Wilcox must recuse himself from any case involving "school choice," or public vouchers for private school students. Must he also step aside on cases involving campaign finance issues?
The answer is yes. The pall of that fine has only recently started to fade for Wilcox, so it would be a shame for him to head into retirement with questions about that brought up again. Sitting in on the Green case would insure that the fines he paid are his legacy on the court.

No reasonable person could argue that Justices Prosser and Wilcox would not come into this case with personal biases. Let's hope they don't try.

Tuesday, September 26, 2006


-By Ann Telnaes via Slate.com

Be careful what you beg for

Progressive Majority has recently posted the rules that were demanded by State Senator Tom Reynolds (R-West Allis) in order for him to debate his opponent Jim Sullivan. You can find them here.

The rules say only news cameras can videotape any part of the debate and outline a way for Reynolds to make the hosts throw out anyone he suspects of taping the debate.

Last time a group attempted a debate, Reynolds tried to make the host agree to confiscate any cell phones with video capability. Here's to hoping someone wants to poke a stick at the crazy animal in the corner by standing up with a cell phone in their hand to see how long it takes Reynolds to lunge at them from the podium.

Do you think Reynolds even gets that by throwing a tantrum for weeks about having cameras at the debate, he has pretty much insured that news cameras will show up at the debate? Chances are the media would have ignored this and any other debate in that race, but now, there's almost no way that there won't be cameras there.

Perhaps this is his way of getting free media coverage. But his past performances on camera should have put the brakes on any plan to get him more TV coverage than absolutely necessary.

Honesty is the best policy

Further, nothing in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article they site indicates that Mark Green would cut anything. During this campaign, the only people who have mentioned anything about cuts to programs are Jim Doyle, the Democrats and the Greater Wisconsin Committee.
-Mark Graul, Congressman Green's campaign manager

At least the Green Team is not trying to delude itself that they are taking the responsible route of telling the voters what cuts they will make in order to implement all of the promises Congressman Green has made during this campaign. Afterall, why should the voters think they deserve to know how a candidate will find over one billion in budget cuts before they head into the voting booth?

And since when does the Republican in the race defend keeping every program in government that is there? I guess the party of less government has thrown in the towel.

Monday, September 25, 2006

Green takes the money and runs

A Milwaukee Journal Sentinel account of the fundraiser held today with Vice President Dick Cheney for Wisconsin Republicans has a really funny detail in it.

The event was billed as a fund-raiser to help GOP candidates in Wisconsin this fall, including governor candidate U.S. Rep. Mark Green. Cheney, however, made only brief reference to Green during his remarks.

Green addressed the luncheon at the Pfister Hotel separately before Cheney was introduced and did not share the speaker's platform with the vice president.

Speaking with reporters after Cheney had left, Green said not to read anything into that.


Riiiiight. The Vice President of the United States travels across the country to raise money for Congressman Green, the Congressman won't even get on stage to shake his hand, and we are to believe it doesn't mean anything?

Of course it means something. It means Congressman Green doesn't want any pictures of himself and Vice President Dick Cheney in the newspaper. Green will have no problem with the Republican Party using the money that Cheney raised for the election this fall; but he doesn't want to get too close to Cheney in case those approval ratings in the twenties are contagious.

The line up of Republicans coming to raise money for Green this fall reads like a who's who of politicians people love to hate. Former Speaker Newt 'shut the whole place down' Gingrich will complete the trifecta with President Bush and Vice President Cheney of leaders Green wants money from with no photographic evidence.

Perhaps Green should talk to State Senator Tom Reynolds on how to avoid cameras before his next event.

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Quotes are all you need on this one

Here is a summary of an article in the Wisconsin State Journal about the stem-cell issue and how the race for governor may impact the future of the research in our state. All you need is a few quotes from the article to see just how important this issue is to the future of medicine and our economy.

"We're still leading, but without support, we'll lose very soon to California or other states." -Igor Slukvin, one of more than 110 UW stem-cell scientists.

"I know (the embryo) has the potential for life, but I can't understand why a blob of cells is considered more important than a person who is alive and suffering from a disease." -Lois Anderson, a Republican conflicted on who to vote for in the governor's race because her husband has Parkinson's disease.

"I have never seen the potential for the university to have an impact on the economy of this state be so great, but I've also never seen the threat of undermining that capability be greater." -John Neis, managing director for Venture Investors of Wisconsin

Any legislation seen as limiting research "would send a powerful message to the biotech, venture capital and research community that Wisconsin has a hostile regulatory environment." -also Neis

A tale of two lobbyists

Lobbying the Wisconsin Elections Board according the Wisconsin State Journal.

It was a scandal. It was just a phone call.
It was a front page story. It was worth nothing more than page three in the local section.
Doyle's name was in the headline. Green isn't even mentioned until paragraph two.
The story about Doyle was used to bury something else for Green. The story about Green was used to remind folks about the accusations about Doyle.

Don't you just hate that liberal media?

Friday, September 22, 2006

Race for the 31st Senate District heats up fast

Senator Ron Brown (R-Eau Claire) is desperately trying to remake himself as he faces re-election this fall. His website offers all sorts of "solutions" for things he should have been working on for the last four years. The voters in his district aren't buying it though. Polling suggests Senator Brown might be looking for a new job soon.

Kathleen Vinehout holds Brown to a statistical dead heat right out of the gate despite Brown holding almost a two-to-one advantage in name recognition. When voters are informed about the two candidates, Vinehout blows Brown out of the water 57% to 39% even though the polling was being done while a positive Brown ad was on TV.

Brown's Bush-like approval numbers continue in many categories. Only about 39% approve of the job he is doing in the Senate.

No doubt Brown's constituents are tired of hearing his claims that he is an avid fisherman while he votes against mercury protections for our lakes and streams. His constituents fish in those waters too and have probably seen nearly every lake in their area slapped with a mercury warning.

His constituents are also probably sick and tired of seeing trash trucks come over the boarder from Minnesota because the Senate and Assembly actually voted to reduce the tipping fee for garbage in their version of the state budget (AB 100, 6/30/05). Wisconsin's tipping fee is already too low and Brown and his colleagues should have increased the tipping fee to keep our state from becoming the dumping ground of the Midwest.

As more people get to know Vinehout on the campaign trial in the next few weeks, her numbers are only going to go up. Brown is headed no where but down.

Senator Ellis' memory problems

It was hard not to laugh at all the Republicans tripping over each other yesterday to be the first to post about an attorney contacting the Elections Board Members about the illegal money Congressman Green is being ordered to get rid of in order to comply with Wisconsin State Law. While it was probably not a great PR move, it is not illegal.

Do the Republicans really think that no one supporting Green contacted the Republican members of the Elections Board? Anyone that says they believe that is just not based in reality.

But the Republican that takes the cake on this one is Senator Ellis who said this:
"That's the very same sort of activity that recently sent state legislators like Senator Chuck Chvala and Representative Scott Jensen to jail.'
Um, no it's not. You know what is similar though? This little nugget from a 1995 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Story:
For his part, Ellis has vowed to remember any and all lobbying groups and lobbyists whom he holds responsible, if he and his party are dumped out of power by Petak's recall. Anyone who has "decided they would like to make me the minority leader . . . is going to have to be prepared to accept the consequences, just like you do in politics," Ellis said.

Thank goodness for those statutes of limitation huh?

Thursday, September 21, 2006

All the girls stomp your feet like this

In the hopes that a few college age girls check out my blog today after being named the Daily Cardinal blog of the week, I want to urge them to use their power to vote on an issue that will impact their future.

The election this fall for governor and attorney general could not be more important to the ability of young women to control their reproductive health. Having the right to control your reproductive health means being able to run your career the way you want and compete with the men in your field.

If Congressman Mark Green gets elected governor and J.B. Van Hollen gets elected Attorney General of our state, the ability of young women to control their future will go out the window.

The Republicans could not have fielded more extreme candidates when it comes to a woman's right to control their reproductive health. J.B. Van Hollen is endorsed by Pro-Life Wisconsin, which means he doesn't support abortion in ANY circumstance. Not if you are raped, not if in the case of incest, and not even if your life is in danger by going through childbirth.

Congressman Mark Green isn't much better. He doesn't support a woman's right to a safe and legal abortion in the case of rape or incest either. He also doesn't think health care companies should be required to pay for birth control, but doesn't mind if Viagra is given out like candy.

And neither candidate believes woman should have easy access to emergency contraception to stop an unplanned pregnancy. They think a young woman in college should have her career blown off the tracks because a condom breaks. The man in this situation gets to walk away if he wants and it won't hold his career back at all. Access to emergency contraception would make this situation far more fair, but Green and Van Hollen think a couple of cells in women's body are more important than a future career.

If a young woman in college happens to get pregnant from a gang rape like the one that happened to a woman recently behind a dumpster near the UW-Madison campus, tough. Congressman Green and J.B. Van Hollen don't think it should be easy for her to take precautions against getting pregnant by taking emergency contraception.

Neither Congresman Green or J.B. Van Hollen ever had to worry about a pregnancy while they were in college and what it could do to their future. And if college women don't come out and vote for Governor Doyle and Kathleen Falk for Attorney General this fall, neither will the women currently in college.

Congressman Green and J.B. Van Hollen will make the decision for them.

Have fun at Congress' expense and maybe win money doing it

Remember when Chevy invited people to put together new commercials for them? People had great fun putting together the ads and even did a few that made fun of Chevy. Now you have a chance to do the same thing and there is a better topic to use. This time it's the Do-Nothing Congress.

The Sunlight Network is asking people to go to this website and put together an ad to show what Congresspeople do all day. If you make the best ad, you could win $5,000 so get your creative juices going and start making fun of an easy target.

Senator Brown has a fire to put out

Now the bizarre attacks on Kathleen Vinehout, the Democrat running against State Senator Ron Brown, are starting to make sense. There is polling out there that shows Brown has a fire in his district that will take more than the fire truck he drives in parades to put out.

The people of the 31st Senate District are not happy with Brown. He will have to spend a lot of money to break fifty percent at this point. Vinehout almost beats him already in the head-to-head match up; and when voters are given information about both candidates, she beats him outright.

Vinehout is a great candidate and she has a story to tell that many people will find familiar. Her family struggles to pay for health care and when she saw her state senator doing little to help people like her, she decided to run against him. Brown's response so far on health care has been to whine that it's not his fault and hope people don't look too closely at his voting record.

And that's a strategy I hope he continues for the next couple of weeks.

What students think of the brain drain issue

Congressman Mark Green has been searching for an issue to distinguish himself from Governor Doyle and he has recently settled on one – brain drain. Brain drain is the term used to describe college graduates leaving our state for jobs in other states. It's an odd issue to put as many resources into as Congressman Green has done in this election, but with a close election maybe every issue can sway some voters.

Funny thing is, not even the students are buying this. The Daily Cardinal, one of the papers available on the UW-Madison campus, had this to say about Congressman Green’s attempt to use the brain drain issue.
But while discussing taxes in Wisconsin, the debate shifted to the "brain drain," the exodus of those Wisconsin university students out of state, often to Chicago or Twin Cities, after graduation.

Green thinks that Wisconsin's taxes are driving the young people from our state.

While we concede that a brain drain does exist, we don't think it has much to do with Wisconsin's tax burden.

Green specifically blamed property taxes, but property taxes are not on the mind of the youth fleeing to these major metropolitan areas. Most of them will rent apartments. How many 23-year-olds with student loans can really afford the down payment for a house?

Young people are not fleeing to Chicago and the Twin Cities because our taxes are too high, they are fleeing to these cities because they want to live in a vibrant urban environment teeming with jobs for the highly educated.

Seriously, how long has Congressman Green been out of college? Does he even remember what it was like to be 23 and looking at all the possibilities stretched out before you?

When I left Wisconsin after I graduated from the UW-Madison, taxes never even crossed my mind. I moved to Philly and then to Washington, D.C. because I wanted to go someplace new and exciting. The state of Wisconsin could have offered me a tax-free life here and I wouldn't have stayed. I wanted to meet new people and enjoy the freedom of being able to throw everything I own in a truck and go wherever I wanted before I had real responsibilities to tie me down.

I eventually moved back because I missed my family and I missed my home state. The big cities are great to live in for a while, but they are also exhausting because the people really just aren't as nice as the folks here. Every trip to the grocery store gets annoying because the clerks aren't helpful and don't have to be nice to you. There are 7 million potential customers in the metro area so being nice to you is simply not necessary.

The bottom line is Congressman Green is using students to talk about taxes rather than actually address the issue facing that generation.

If Congressman Green wants to make sure young Wisconsin graduates come back or never leave in the first place, he will offer a plan to invest heavily in the new economy. A recently released study showing the economic impact of the University Research Park points to the direction our state needs to go. The average employee working there makes $62,000 a year, which is much higher than the county average.

Salaries like that will bring many graduates home when they are looking for a place to live after they have experienced the big cities.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Clean up your own house

After Jessica McBride got done trying to make all Democrats looking bad because a few of them running for office are on the fringe, Xoff correctly notes that the people McBride cites were soundly defeated while the Republican side actually nominates people on the edge.

The views of some of in the Republican party are not only outside of the mainstream, they can be hateful and cruel. Take the Republican running against Rep. Terry Van Akkeran in Sheboygan. Here is part of a post on an internet board from that candidate:
Truth and Morality are "timeless," and not subject to Popular Opinion. If there are 100 people in a room, and all 100 Vote that Homosexuality is Okay, irregardless, Homosexuality is still Morally Wrong.



If you polled 1,000 Groups of 1,000 each about whether it is Morally Wrong for an adult man to have sex with an 8 year old girl, you would probably find at least 1 pedophile, in each Group, who would say sex with an 8 year old girl is okay. So now, if we take that 1 pedophile from each Group, and form 1 Group of 1,000 pedophiles, and they unanimously Vote that is is completely acceptable for an adult man to have sex with an 8 year old girl, will that make it Morally Right? No.



Homosexuality is no different. Homosexuality has always been recognized as a Sexual Perversion, and simply because society has become weak on the subject, and has bowed to the Vocal Minority, does not make Homosexuality Morally Right, any more than a Group of pedophiles Voting to approve of pedophilia.



What was Morally Wrong before, is still Morally Wrong now. All the Theories, and Studies in the World, that falsely conclude that some people are "born Homosexual," will not make Homosexuality Morally Right. These are simply people in need of Psychological Counseling, the same as pedophiles are in need of Psychological Counseling. Plain and Simple. End of Story.
No doubt this candidate has seen that the Republican Party has welcomed similar views from their elected lunatic, Senator Tom Reynolds (R-West Allis) and felt comfortable sharing them with people on the internet.

I feel confident the voters of the Sheboygan area will reject these views and this candidate in November, but will fellow Republicans like Jessica McBride be writing any time soon about the need to reject the views of Van Akkren's opponent because they are outside of the mainstream?

Didn't think so.

Trying too hard

WISC-TV has a section on their website where they post the "Reality Check" segment of their newscast. That segment examines what candidates say on the campaign trail and in their commercials and tries to match what they say to facts. They recently posted a segment about the debate where they try too hard to say both candidates are right about everything they argued about at the debate.

When it came to the jobs portion of the debate, Congressman Mark Green tried to say that Wisconsin is losing jobs under Governor Doyle, but the facts don't back up Green. Here is what WISC posted about it:
The candidates also couldn't agree on whether there are more or fewer jobs in Wisconsin under Doyle's watch.

"When I took office we were losing jobs and we have been gaining jobs in Wisconsin," Doyle said.

"The sad reality is we obviously are losing jobs," Green said.

Who's right? Again, it's a mixed bag.

According to the federal government, Wisconsin has gained 177,000 jobs since Doyle took office, and manufacturing jobs are up 7,600 while many other manufacturing states have lost jobs.

Ummm, where is the mixed part? Not only has Wisconsin gained jobs, our state has bucked a national trend on manufacturing. Those jobs typically pay family-supporting wages so they are a great addition to our economy.

You can find the story here if you need to make sure I didn't cut out only the part I wanted to use.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Why our country should not have secret prisons with no oversight

A story from the Washington Post today illustrates exactly why our country should not have secret prisons with no oversight. If you are Muslim, all you have to do is talk to people a government is watching and you could end up losing years of your life whether you know if the people you are talking to are up to no good or not. The Canadian in this account has a horrific story:
Arar, now 36, was detained by U.S. authorities as he changed planes in New York on Sept. 26, 2002. He was held for questioning for 12 days, then flown by jet to Jordan and driven to Syria. He was beaten, forced to confess to having trained in Afghanistan -- where he never has been -- and then kept in a coffin-size dungeon for 10 months before he was released, the Canadian inquiry commission found.

You can find the rest of the story here.

And while many people think they can rest easy because they are not the ethnic group the government is currently targeting, keep in mind a quote from the past. Many variations have been tossed around and people argue over the original text of the poem, but it doesn't really matter what the orginal words were. No matter what groups you plug into the poem, the meaning comes through loud and clear.

They came first for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me,
and by that time no one was left to speak up.


Pastor Martin Niemoller

Military in Iran?

This should make everyone sleep a little less easy tonight if this is true. A retired general was on CNN today saying “We are conducting military operations inside Iran right now. The evidence is overwhelming.”

Congressman Green did what he was told

There is an interesting website out now where you can get information about Republican Congresspeople from the DCCC. The page for Congressman Green can be found here and from there you can find the rest of our Republican delegation.

If you compare the Republican Congressmen from Wisconsin you will find that none of them voted with President Bush as often as Congressman Green did. When President Bush came looking for votes in Congress to implement his agenda that few Americans are currently happy with, Congressman Green rarely said no. He voted with President Bush 88 percent of the time. Congressmen Ryan, Petri and Sensenbrenner are no moderates by any stretch but they all voted against President Bush's agenda more often than Congressman Green.

He said no to his party leaders even less often than he said no to President Bush. If Congressman Green had voted against cutting federal student financial aid by $12.7 billion, he could have lowered his percentage for voting with his party leaders for a good cause. He also could have lowered his percentage by voting to expand the military health care program to Reservists and National Guard members, but he chose party allegiance over our soldiers.

Congressman Green would have taken a lot of heat from his party leaders for voting against their wishes on these and other bills. But the thanks from our students and soldiers should have been worth enough to him to take the heat.

Green ignoring the corruption in Congress

For a guy that sees corruption everywhere he looks on the Dem side, Congressman Green has a remarkable ability to turn a blind eye to the muck coming out of Congress these days.

Congressman Bob Ney (R-OH), a man he liked so much that he invited him to our state so we could all get the Ney version on reform, has recently admitted to felonies but he is refusing to resign from his job. Someone concerned about corruption in government should be demanding that anyone guilty of a felony for actions involving their conduct in office step down from office immediately.

We haven't heard one word from Congressman Green on his friend Ney lately though. Why should Ney still be getting a check from the taxpayers of this country? Why does Congressman Green think Ney should still be getting taxpayer paid for health care when there are millions of Americans that do without health care because they can't afford it?

It's not surprising if this sounds sickeningly familiar to you. Congressman Green's leader up until a few months ago didn't remove himself from office until the public ran him out of town. Congressman Green and his colleagues even voted to change the rules to let former Majority Leaders Tom DeLay stay longer.

If Congressman Green can't see the corruption in Congress and be a leader on it by speaking out against it, why should voters believe he will be a leader on that issue as Governor?

Hundtermark helpful?

Even though Congressman Mark Green endorsed Jean Hundtermark before the primary, he must be questioning whether or not she brings anything at all to the ticket after seeing the numbers coming in on election night last week.

Nick Voegeli receiving 44% of the statewide vote in the Republican primary for Lt. Governor races was amusing when we were all talking about how he spent very little, but now that we see he spent not one thin dime it really makes you wonder why Voegeli received so few votes.

Was it a gender thing? Did people just flip a coin? Does the average GOP voter not like Hundtermark? Who knows?

But maybe it was that endorsement from Congressman Green...

Monday, September 18, 2006

New swift boat group getting sued by IN

And before any Republicans say it's just some liberal Democrat suing, take note that the Attorney General in IN is a Republican.

TPMmuckraker has the story here.

The reason Senator Reynolds is camera shy?

Progressive Majority has the answer here.

It seems Senator Tom Reynolds(R-West Allis) just doesn't know what he should and shouldn't talk about when the camera is rolling. Check out the video. It's unbelievable. The post from Progressive Majority is called "Senator Tom Reynolds on Fingers, Butts and Spankings" so that should give you a hint as to how weird the video gets.

Voting machines hacked

Republicans often complain about vote fraud, but not one ever pipes up about how easy it is to hack into the electronic voting machines being put in all over the country. Curious isn't it?

They worry about a handful of people voting in our state that shouldn't, but don't worry that the entire vote can be compromised by someone who can pick a small lock and download a program. A new report out illustrates how easy it was for a group of graduate students to do this.
Felten and graduate students Ariel Feldman and Alex Halderman found that malicious programs could be placed on the Diebold by accessing the memory card slot and power button, both behind a locked door on the side of the machine. One member of the group was able to pick the lock in 10 seconds, and software could be installed in less than a minute, according to the report.
And they could do a lot of damage in that minute.
The researchers say they designed software capable of modifying all records, audit logs and counters kept by the voting machine, ensuring that a careful forensic examination would find nothing wrong.

The programs were able to modify vote totals or cause machines to break down, something that could alter the course of an election if machines were located in crucial polling stations.

It was also possible to design a computer virus to spread malicious programs to multiple machines by piggybacking on a new software download or an election information file being transferred from machine to machine, Felten said.
If the Republicans were really worried about an accurate voting process, they would be pounding the tables demanding something better than the machines that are being used now. Of course, a hardcore Republican manufactures and sells many of the machines so chances are the Republicans know they can be the last ones in the machines to put together the vote totals they want to see.

You can find the rest of the story here.

Green's march to the middle

The September 15th edition of the Isthmus has an article by Doug Hissom that is worth the read. It examines Congressman Mark Green's move to the middle of the political spectrum after years of voting as a hardcore conservative in Congress. The article does a really good job of examining whether or not Congressman Green's moderate talk on the campaign trail matches his voting record in Congress.

Turns out the Congressman Green on the campaign trail doesn't even resemble Congressman Green in Congress.

Almost every politician moves to the middle as election day moves closer, but not all do it well. A politician moderating her/his stance must perform a delicate balancing act that attracts new voters without pushing away the base of voters they have relied on in the past. The moderation has to be on the right issues that will bring more voters than lost by changing positions.

One of the issues that Congressman Green chose to moderate his stance on, embryonic stem-cell research, could prove to be a gamble he will lose. At this late stage, it's going to be hard for Congressman Green to convince the average voter that he will be better for our state on the stem-cell issue. Governor Doyle has spent months talking about his support for stem-cell research and contrasting it with Congressman Green's refusal to fund the research without the Catholic Church getting to hover over the scientists in the lab.

The only way for Congressman Green to try to sway the average voter that he will be good for the state on the stem-cell issue would be running a large TV ad campaign on the issue. The couple of press releases that he has put out saying he is for embryonic stem-cell research that doesn't destroy embryos, even though that research doesn't exist, have not gotten him enough exposure to sway the average voter.

But a TV ad campaign on the stem-cell issue would only serve to remind the "pro-life" voters that Congressman Green is not on their side and might make a lot of them stay home on election day. In the end, Congressman Green will probably sacrifice more voters than he will gain by trying to find a middle ground on embryonic stem-cells because what the releases have done is signal to the "pro-life" voters that really follow politics that Congressman Green might sell them out if he is elected governor.

Single-issue "pro-life" voters haven't proven to be a very forgiving bunch. They have punished politicians in the past by not showing up on election day if a candidate doesn't support their agenda all the way.

The abortion issue that Congressman Green and his supporters have tied to embryonic stem-cells is not one to be played with in politics close to an election. The few people that do vote solely on the abortion issue do not have any wiggle room for candidates and far too many candidates have tried to appease both sides of the abortion issue only to be rejected by both.

When you try to make everyone happy, everyone ends up mad on the abortion issue. And they often end up staying home on election day.

Coffee drinking Christians unite!

Catacombs Coffeehouse, a Christian gathering place on the UW-Madison campus, had to move from its location in the Pres House due to a construction project that will remodel the building and add space. How long before we see the Congressman Green press release demanding that the UW stop all of its discriminatory construction? Surely this whole "remodeling" project is nothing more than an attempt to harass coffee drinking Christians.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Gard's student tax plan

Rep. John Gard, the Republican candidate for the 8th Congressional District of Wisconsin, recently released his tax plan for students. I found one aspect of the plan very funny.
Increase the Student Loan Interest Deduction --- Raise the limit on the amount of interest that one may deduct on interest paid on student loans from $2,500 to $5,000.

Why do we need to increase the interest deduction? Because the guy leaving the seat in Congress that Gard wants just voted to increase the interest charged on student loans. Oh and that guy, Congressman Mark Green, is currently running for governor of our state trying to sell people on the fact that he is good for higher education.

So does Gard think Green was wrong to vote to increase the interest rate charged on student loans? If he doesn't, that is the most ridiculous way to get a tax cut.

NRCC budget in 8th CD so far

The National Republican Congressional Committee(NRCC) recently bought $2 million in negative advertising. The last entry in this FEC report is for the 8th Congressional District of Wisconsin. It says $89,129.60 is going to be spent against the Democrat in that race, Steve Kagen.

According to the FEC filing, the NRCC is doing issue ads against Kagen. So what's the issue in their ads? The NRCC doesn't think the Republican in that race, John Gard, can hold that Republican seat on his own and they are going to beat up Kagen for Gard. The NRCC knows Gard brings more baggage into this race than a Samsonite sale and that's why Green Bay area residents are seeing ads attacking Kagen for having the nerve to think he should get paid for his services as a doctor.

It's early and Gard is going to need a lot of help to hold this seat in the Republican column so don't be surprised if this is the first of many NRCC filings for the 8th CD this fall.

Spinach contamination should prompt questions to Republicans

The E.coli outbreak on spinach this week should prompt some tough questions for the Wisconsin Assembly and Senate Republicans. Why? One of the most likely sources of this outbreak was irrigation with water contaminated with manure.

Does that sound familiar? It should.

This post from Xoff in early August alerted everyone to a news story that was receiving little attention. The Senate and Assembly Agriculture Committees heard hours of testimony about a proposed rule from the Department of Natural Resources that would prevent big agribusinesses from spreading manure on frozen ground. The testimony included this:
The testimony of the young father before the Senate and Assembly Agriculture Committees was dramatic and heart-wrenching. Two years ago he got up from his dinner table and went to the kitchen faucet to pour a glass of water. Out of the tap came manure laced water. Panic set in as he thought about the fact that the meal that had just been eaten by his wife and their three young daughters had been prepared with water form that faucet.

Four days later Scott Treml picked his six and one-half month daughter Samantha out of her crib, seriously ill and covered in feces and vomit and rushed her to the emergency room. He and his wife Judy were told that there was a good chance that their daughter could die or suffer severe brain damage. Thankfully she recovered. The next day, daughters Kaitlyn (8) and Emily (6) become seriously ill, another day later his wife and three days later he becomes seriously ill. The whole family eventually recovered.

When agribusinesses spread manure on frozen ground, it ends up in a lot of places other than the field they are trying to fertilize. Sometimes it comes out of your tap, and sometimes it ends up contaminating water that will be used to irrigate fields. Even when the ground is not frozen, manure spreading has to be done carefully so it doesn't run off into area water that will be consumed or used for irrigation.

If we don't want to see more outbreaks like the one we just had with the spinach, we need to pass the types of rules that the Republicans in the state legislature turned down this year.

Saturday, September 16, 2006

The ghost of debate past

The Wisconsin State Journal ran the most ridiculous picture of the debate on the front page today. Governor Doyle looks like some sort of ghost or mist. The online version is about 100 percent clearer than the printed version. You can barely even tell that Doyle is in the picture in the printed version.

Hmmm, which candidate does that paper favor?

The debate was a snooze fest and neither candidate said anything new. Congressman Mark Green looked like he just stepped out of the sauna before he got on stage. Those lights must have been pretty hot. Doyle started to look shiny as well near the end, but Congressman Green's face was more of a white light reflection from the minute the camera came on last night.

Overall, the debate was a draw. Neither candidate looked stellar, but neither looked bad either. But since Congressman Green is the one that needs the debates to introduce himself to most of the state, the night was a loss for him.

Friday, September 15, 2006

Illinois can have Sensenbrenner

From the Washington Post...

Outgoing D.C. Mayor Tony Williams , at his weekly news briefing Wednesday, talked about meeting with House Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner to talk about getting voting representation in Congress.

Williams went on about how Sensenbrenner is from Illinois, and how that's a great state, always supportive of civil rights, home of Abraham Lincoln , our greatest president and so on.

At the end, one reporter asked: But isn't Sensenbrenner from Wisconsin?

Well, whatever, Williams said, it's a "core American value" were talking about.

Will McDonell pull a Cheney?

The front page of the Wisconsin State Journal local section has a story about Dane County Board Chairman Scott McDonell declaring that he will run for Dane County Executive if Falk wins the Attorney General race in November. She will so that means McDonell will become the interim county executive when Falk resigns. He then has 30 days to appoint a temporary county executive.

And here's the 'pulling the Cheney' part - he hasn't decided whether or not he would appoint himself.

To look high and low and find no one else that could hold the office for four months would be akin to Vice President Dick Cheney heading up the search for President Bush's Vice President and finding on one as good as himself out there. Except for McDonell, it would be riskier. Voters had no way of punishing Vice President Cheney because he was part of a ticket. McDonell would face the voters alone after he declares himself best in the land.

To be sure, being viewed as the incumbent has a lot of advantages. But Dane County voters might not take kindly to a king maker.

Debate jeopardy

Congressman Mark Green will go into his first statewide television appearance tonight with some pretty big numbers floating around out there about him. So let's play a little game of Jeopardy so everyone has the numbers straight before the debate.

$1 billion - What is the total cost of Congressman Mark Green sticking to his campaign pledges so far? It's only September and according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Congressman Green has promised to take our state at least $1 billion into the red. That number doesn't even include two parts of his plan that will cost millions more, but Congressman Green has this pesky little habit of making his "plans" so vague that no one can figure out what they will do or cost. Including Congressman Green.

$10 Trillion - What is the debt ceiling that Congressman Green has voted to take our nation to after years of Republican budget mismanagement? That's right, you're grandchildren will still be paying for Congressman Green's budget mismanagement long after he is gone.

33 percent - What is the increase in federal spending that Congressman Green has voted for in the last four budget cycles? Count the minutes it takes Congressman Green tonight to say he will fiscally responsible and reduce spending. You won't get to the 33 that matches the increases he has voted for as a Congressman.

Four days - What is the number of days that Congressman Green has refused to even talk to the state's largest newspaper about his budget record and plans? By all means, keep ignoring the state's largest newspaper. If there is something that reporters love more than anything, it's being ignored. They never take it out on the candidates that ignore them. Just ask Scott McCallum.

$467,844 - What is the dollar amount of PAC money that Green has in his campaign account that needs to be returned the day after the debate because it against the state law that says money spent on Wisconsin campaigns must come from PACs registered in Wisconsin? It's a law folks, not a rule made up by the Elections Board. And Congressman Green's defense of "that's what everyone else was doing" has been tried before. Maybe you remember it. It was called the Scott Jensen trial. The rules of politics change all the time. They change when the collective will decides that it's time to start enforcing the rules in place.

Round two will come with the second debate...

Congressman Green: A Property That's Been On The Market For A Long Time

I guess the housing market really is a buyer's market right now. In fact, if you have been bankrolling the right politician for a over a decade, you can buy an entire housing plan for about $100,000.

Earlier this week the AP revealed that Congressman Mark Green took in about $100,000 in campaign donations from real estate and building interests on the day before and the day after he outlined a plan that would be very beneficial to the industry. But a One Wisconsin Now press release shows that the real estate industry put a sold sign on Congressman Green a long time ago. They got in on the ground floor.
In January 1994, Green received $1,220 in Wisconsin Realtors Association PAC and conduit money and then was the main author of a bill to give real estate agents a partial exemption from a fraudulent sales representation law. The bill, which passed the state assembly in November of 1995, would only make real estate agents legally responsible only if they knowingly gave false information to a client, unlike other sales representatives who are responsible even if they did not know the information was false. (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, “Assembly Sold on Realtors Bill,” November 15, 1995; Wisconsin State Journal, “Assembly OKs Bill to Protect Real Estate Agents from Lawsuits,” November 15, 1995)
I mean really, why should real estate agents have to live by the same rules as everyone else?

And let's not forget, this is the standard that the Republicans have set for donations so they will have no trouble admitting that they aren't living by the standards they have demanded for Governor Doyle, right?

Of course not. When the Green Team was asked about the timing of the donations, they said there was no connection and the group just supports Congressman Green's agenda. The real estate industry said the donations are ok because their support of Green goes back fifteen years.

But when a Wisconsin business that has known and supported Governor Doyle for years gives money to his campaign, the Republicans think state employees should go to prison.

Time will tell if the standard the Republicans have set will come back to bite them harder. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Race for Dane County Executive

There have been a few articles popping up about the people that may run for Dane County Executive once Kathleen Falk wins the race for Attorney General. (Ok, that last part is from me.) The names of a couple of Dane County Board Members have been batted around, but I wonder why no one has asked Madison Mayor Dave about the race yet.

Unless I missed it, Mayor Dave has not announced he is running for reelection. When asked about it in May of this year when Ray Allen announced he is running for Mayor of Madison, Mayor Dave said it was too early because people are thinking about summer rather than politics. True, but he has also been on board with Kathleen from the very beginning of her campaign so waiting to see if she won may be what is really keeping him from announcing he is running for mayor again.

The County Executive job would allow Mayor Dave to work on the issues he cares about in a more complete fashion than working for just one city. Issues like the environment and transportation are really better addressed with regional solutions.

Mayor Dave may just be waiting to announce his reelection until after the elections of this fall are in the pas. But I'm surprised a reporter didn't call him when they made the round of phone calls to ask about Falk's current job.

Health care on hold

Note to Senator Ron Brown (R-Eau Claire) - The actions by your colleagues yesterday is one of the reasons your constituents are forming coalitions in your area about health care reform. Your silence on the action guarantees that these groups will continue to grow and demand answers from you.

Yesterday the Republican lead Senate Committee on Organization voted 3-2 along party lines to delay putting out the recommendations of the Senate Select Committee on Health Care Reform.

Quick - three guesses as to which month the delay was pushed to and you won't need all three guesses to get it right.

If you guessed December, you get to advance to the next round.

Senator Jon Erpenbach (D-Middleton) said this of the move to delay the release until after the elections:
With campaigns now in full gear after Tuesday's primary, Erpenbach believes that the committee missed an opportunity to have health care reform become part of the dialogue for candidates this fall.
And that's the point isn't it? Republicans don't even want to talk about this issue much less do anything to try to solve it.

What a smooth move by leadership. If the Republicans didn't want to talk about this issue during the election cycle, why did they have the release date scheduled for mid-September in the first place? It's not like election day was only recently scheduled. This action just puts their unwillingness to tackle this issue on public display right before an election.

Most likely the Republicans didn't like the sound of the recommendations they were going to have to make in the report. Trying to get people health care coverage sounds like 'big government' to most Republicans even though the business owners of our country are the ones clamoring the loudest for health care reform these days.

The health care cost issue won't be on hold until after the election just because the Republicans pull stunts like this. People will still get their bills and employees will learn that their employer will no longer provide coverage between now and election day.

And if the Democrats are smart, they will keep bringing this topic up.

Swift boaters are back

The 8th Congressional District might get a real treat this fall on TV. They might get to see some nasty ads done up by those that did the so-called Swift Boat Veterans For Truth ads in 2004. The guy that put up the money for that lovely piece of work has just dumped $5 million into a new 527 group for the elections this fall.

Steve Kagen might be on the receiving end of this money since holding onto the 8th Congressional District is an important part of the Republican plan to keep the House of Representatives under their control.

TPMmuckraker has the story here.

The silly season begins

The Republican Party of Wisconsin has officially started the silly season with their press release trying to attack the Kathleen Vinehout, the Democrat running against Senator Ron Brown in the 31st Senate District. In it they accuse Vinehout of being a lobbyist. And she was indeed a lobbyist.

FOR FARMERS.

Yes, Vinehout has spent the last few years lobbying a legislature that won't listen on issue important to family farmers. Call it whatever you want - lobbying, advocating, sounding the alarm, trying to get the attention of the legislature - but criticizing Vinehout for trying to get health insurance for family farmers is an issue I can only hope they bring up over and over again.

It must have been very important to expose this "scandal" quickly since the person making these accusations is only referred to as 'Wiley' in the press release. Wiley's claims that Vinehout's lobbying activities are extensive is just laughable. $41,000 spent on two people over eighteen months hardly makes the Wisconsin Farmers Union or Kathleen Vinehout a powerhouse in the lobbying world.

And if Senator Ron Brown and the legislature did a better job on the issues that family farmers care about, Vinehout wouldn't need to lobby them in the first place.

If this is the issue Republicans are going to use against Vinehout, I like our chances to pick up the 31st Senate District this fall.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Governor Ann Richards

The world of politics became a little more dull today with the loss of former Texas Governor Ann Richards.

I was lucky enough to meet her in DC. Funny thing is, my meeting her had nothing to do with my job in politics. Well, it sort of did. I was her waitress one evening at the restaurant I worked at to be able to afford to work in Congress and live in DC. Her quick humor made that night of work go pretty fast.

If you never saw her give a speech, you missed out on something special.

Bucher finally gets the coverage he needed

The Sp