Dumbing Down the UW System
The University System is de-emphasizing academic prowess and achievement for its admission standards.
This will increase the cost of education for all UW System students as more remedial education courses will need to be offered to meet the demand.Until now, all campuses with the exception of UW-Madison have used set academic requirements such as grade point averages and test scores to make the majority of admissions decisions. The change means no student will be guaranteed admission to the system no matter how good his or her grade point average, test scores or class rank - although these measures will continue to carry the most weight. "There will be no automatic admission, even for top students," said Larry Rubin, the system's assistant vice president for academic and student services.
The holistic review of first-year applicants, to be implemented in 2007, is already being employed at UW-Madison and other selective universities across the country.
There is a growing belief in the admissions world that GPAs, test scores and class rank are an imprecise measure of a student's likely success. A student who enrolled in rigorous classes in high school, for example, may have a lower GPA than a student who took easier coursework.
But it's not just a matter of fairness. A comprehensive review of applicants is required if colleges and universities want to consider race in their admissions.
Kevin nails it.
Rick argues this is nothing new for the UW.Smart, Rich, White Kids Need Not Apply
Where do all the deserving kids who worked their asses off in high school, got good grades, had the extra-curricular activities, prepared themselves for college get to go to complain? I'd say former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, but blaming her would be too easy.The Regents are only using Michigan as an excuse to do this. Sadly, Diversity is being used nationwide in Academia as a cover-all to focus more on a campus that ‘looks like America’ not ‘thinks like America’ or even ‘respects America.’
UW was apparently dropping out minorities and considering them separately where necessary. That's too transparent. They need to be opaque. That's what this is about. I am fairly sure that UW has been trying to get the "best" minority numbers that it could all along and that it will continue to do so. I am not sure you're going to see much change in who gets in and who does not.Owen's take:
It is outrageous that our university system is going to systematically discriminate against kids for things that are completely outside of their control. And for what? So liberal white guilt can be appeased and university officials can feel good about themselves at night when they go to bed in their ivory towers.




2 Comments:
You would think at least one blogger would look at the admission standards at Madison ALREADY IN EFFECT under these criteria before bloviating.
Admission to the Madison campus remains the hardest ticket to obtain among ALL of the universities in the state, public and private. (Yes, it's much harder to get into Madison than a private school like Marquette.)
Pasted below you will find data from the UW-Madison web site which shows the actual credentials of the class enrolled in 2005. A link to the web site is provided.
Before you play "woe is me" on the violin, take a look. All your kid has to do is be in the top 10% of his or her class and get in the top 10% on the ACT or SAT and he or she is "in like flint."
Enrolled Freshmen, Fall 2005
Academic Qualifications (middle 50%)
Class Rank 85th to 96th percentile
GPA (unweighted academic) 3.5 to 3.9
SAT (max score of 1600) 1180 to 1350
ACT 26 to 30
Source: http://www.admissions.wisc.edu/facts.php.
The phrase is actually "in like Flynn" derived either from the sexual exploits of actor Errol Flynn or the political machinations of Bronx pol "Boss" Flynn. Apparently the term was corrupted by a 1967 movie that, in an attempt at word play, was called "In Like Flint." The details are here and here.
This blogger is well aware of the UW's current policies and I do not think that the new policy will lead to different results.
Post a Comment
<< Home