Doyle on High Gas Prices
First, it was his dog and pony show of a 'hearing.'
Now this.
Wisconsin and Michigan will join together in calling for a cap on oil company profits, Gov. Jim Doyle's office said this morning.What a joke.
Doyle will appear at a Brookfield gas station at 10 a.m. today to unveil details of the plan to limit how much oil companies can make. The move comes days after Exxon Mobil, the world's largest publicly-trade oil company, announced that it had earned more than $8 billion since the start of the year.
A windfall profits tax is counter productive. It will result in reduced domestic oil produciton and make us more dependent on foreign oil. What leads me to believe this? History.
An angry public wants quick relief from high prices" at the pump, says Business Week. That's hardly a surprise. Over the past year, the Energy Department reports, a gallon of regular gasoline has gone from $1.86 to $2.96.
But even at less than bottled water, $3 gasoline hurts consumers and the economy as a whole. The question, however, is what to do?
The worst approach is one now being considered by the Senate: slap a windfall profits tax, or WPT, on oil companies.
The United States has tried this before, between 1980 and 1987, and the results were hugely counterproductive, according to a 1990 Congressional Research Service report.
"The WPT reduced domestic oil production between 3 and 6 percent, and increased oil imports from between 8 and 16 percent," says the report. "This made the U.S. more dependent upon imported oil."
It's not hard to understand why. Energy companies are in a very risky business. They (and the investors and lenders who back them) commit hundreds of billions of dollars annually to searching for oil and gas, and to building or expanding refineries, ports and pipelines. These projects take many years to complete and the payoff down the road is highly uncertain. It's tough enough to make investment decisions in anticipation of market conditions that can change overnight, but why spend vast sums to develop energy if -- as a reward -- government hits you with a special tax?
So, with a WPT, oil companies cut back. As for the WPT's professed rationale, profits have indeed risen lately, but, according to Business Week data, second-quarter earnings of oil and natural-gas companies were 7.7 percent of sales, compared with 7.9 percent for all U.S. industries. The price of oil -- like the price of any commodity -- bounces around as a result of changes in supply and demand.
In the early 1980s, a barrel of oil was more than $80 in today's currency. By the 1990s, oil was less than one-third the current price and gasoline was just over a buck a gallon. When oil fell to $9.39 a barrel six years ago, was Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., author of the current WPT, proposing a windfall losses rebate? Nope.
And, I have another question.
What does Governor Doyle have against immigrants?
He's holding a press conference this morning to tout this joke of an initiative.
Doesn't he know he was supposed to boycott work, school and commerce today?
Man, he must hate it when his pandering schedule has conflicts.




8 Comments:
I tell you, it's not easy being a lieberal.
RE: steveegg...no coincidence there was a "lie" in "lieberal"....
heh.
If Brazil can achieve energy independence, we should be able to also.
I wouldn't mind paying $5.00 per gallon, if I knew that my money was going to a farmer somewhere in the midwest (who was previously on government subsidies) for peanut oil, corn-based ethanol, or some other bio-diesel, and not some country with religious fanatics bent on wiping us off the face of the globe.
"I wouldnt mind paying $5 per gallon" that is crazy talk.
do you know how long it took Brazil to achieve energy independence also they had State control of their oil industry are you also in favor of that?
Here is an idea build more refineries open up Anwr and the Gulf of Mexico oil fields get rid of all the blends of gas. That is how you lower the cost of gas.
Anon - if the shoe fits in their mouths, far be it from me to stop the foot-in-mouth disease.
Nathan - Quick review of Brazil's "energy independence": it was achieved after years and years of government subisidies for sugar cane supplying a demand that is far less than the US (for the US to duplicate Brazil's ethanol effort, every acre of arable land and then some would need to be devoted to ethanol-producing plants, leaving nothing for food or silage); and BTW, that land is now starting to be played out, reducing sugar cane yield and thus ethanol production.
Paying $3.00 per gallon was crazy talk as late as last year...
I'm not saying we need to clone what they have done--but even a significant increase in domestic supply would be preferable to none at all.
Consider also--"we feed the world" as the saying goes, yet our farmers are being squeezed out due to lack of demand. With our modern farming technologies, we are producing more than ever per acre, and with logical crop rotation, I believe we could create a significant industry out of this.
1. Less money going to the Middle East.
2. More renewable resources here in the States.
3. More jobs for people here at home.
4. Reduction in gov't subsidies to our farmers.
Also, who needs the government to start this ball rolling? I can't imagine that it would be impossible to make money on this--if the right players were involved. That's how capitolism is supposed to work, right? Start to make it happen while we still have time--not after we have no other options.
Don't get me wrong: I'm not some nutty "somewhere over the rainbow everything is just peachy" types. I'm all for getting rid of gasoline blends, untying the hands of the oil industry and letting them get after it. This whole taxing of profits thing is utterly ridiculous too, but then what do you expect from politicians who will ignor the patently obvious when it goes against what the crowd is shrilling?
I'd still rather pay more if I knew it was going to working folks here in the states.
Nathan, two more tidbits on ethanol:
- The US is currently importing half the ethanol it uses, mostly from Brazil. While the Brazilians aren't chanting "Death to America" in the streets weekly, they have one thing in common with Iran - a covert nuclear program.
- Prices on the commodity futures markets at the close of trading yesterday (NYMEX for gasoline, CBOT for ethanol): E0 gasoline - $2.069/gallon, reformulated (E10) gasoline - $2.282/gallon, $2.580/gallon
Post a Comment
<< Home