Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Spencer Coggs Supports Cleaning up Poll Lists

I wonder if he's thought this through. Because I think his idea only reinforces the fact that the poll list situation in Wisconsin is a farce. (Which is a huge part of the argument in favor of requiring voters to prove who they are on election day).

State Sen. Spencer Coggs (D-Milwaukee) has offered a bill that would require court officials to include voter lists in jury databases to increase the number of African-Americans and minorities available for jury duty.

The move comes after an all-white jury acquitted three white former police officers charged in the 2004 beating of Frank Jude Jr., who is biracial.

"The Jude trial has shaken the public's confidence in our justice system," Coggs said. "This will help restore a measure of confidence and insure that citizens can more fully expect a real jury of their peers."
Regardless of the fact that Coggs views peers solely on racial lines, if the poll lists weren't such a damn mess, I wouldn't oppose this proposal.
The City of Milwaukee has dropped about 105,000 names from its voter rolls after completing the first purge since 2001, city officials said Tuesday.

That represents about 23% of the 450,000 names that had been on the rolls.

Officials had said they were unsure if a purge of the rolls had been conducted after the 2000 election.

Coggs believes the jury system is tilted against the African-American community and uses the Jude case to prove his assertion.

Regardless of his faulty logic, ironically, Coggs bill may not even solve the 'problem' he's trying to address.

Milwaukee County Clerk of Court John Barrett, whose office is responsible for summoning potential jurors and for the management of court personnel, said the proposed legislation may not increase minority representation on juries. "The percentages might parallel the percentages of the state Department of Transportation records," Barrett said. "If you take the county, you are adding the 18 suburbs. That doesn't necessarily increase minority percentages."

Under Cogg's bill, Milwaukee and Racine counties would be required to include voter registration lists in the database for jury selection starting in July of next year. The director of state courts would then compare and report to the legislature the composition of juries for the first six months of 2007 under the current system, and from the last six months after the changes, according to the bill.

Just weeks ago, 23 percent of the city's poll list was garbage. Imagine how many jury summons they'd have to issue to get enough candidates to show up.

If the poll lists are cleaned up, I support this bill.

Not because I think the Jude verdict was racially motivated, but because I favor expanding the jury pool. Why should drivers have all the fun?

9 Comments:

At 3:16 PM, Anonymous said...

What is your concern about voter lists? One individual could serve as two jurors for the same case?

 
At 3:25 PM, Dailytakes said...

No, my concern is they will have to issue even more summons than usual because the list contains so many non residents.

 
At 3:37 PM, Anonymous said...

What precentage of registrations do you think don't relate to an actual resident??

This would be a non-issue.

 
At 3:40 PM, Dailytakes said...

Considering Milwaukee is one of the few Counties to actually lose population...I would imagine the number is considrable.

Moreover, even if it was a matter of moving from one address to another within the city, if the list isn't kept updated, the costs would be considerable.

For political mailings, for example, we consider it normal for there to be a 10 percent attrition rate per year on any list. DOT updates their lists regularly, that's why DOT lists were used.

As I wrote, if we could fix the poll list accuracy issue, I support this concept.

 
At 4:15 PM, Anonymous said...

Even at 1% - a hugely exaggerated figure -- this would me one no-show juror per venire of 100.

Laziness and inattentivess keep more would-be jurors home. This would pose no problem for the jury system and could improve the representation of the whole community on juries.

Your criticism of the idea is based entirely on fantasy.

 
At 7:38 PM, Dailytakes said...

You believe only one percent of the voters move every year and you believe MY argument is based on fantasy?

 
At 9:08 AM, Anonymous said...

no, a rate of 1% of those summoned for jury duty from voter rolls who are not residents

 
At 12:10 PM, State Street Shirt Company said...

10% per year is a fairly accurate figure to represent the inaccuracies in voter registration lists - seriously, with same-day-registration, who among us updates their voter registration as soon as they move to a new address? Not me. Municipalities are not required to scrub their lists of old registrations for quite a while...

I would wager a significantly higher percentage update their address with DOT, not to mention the fact that DOT scrubs their data...

Working with the registration lists in my area, I saw on a list I obtained in 2005 from my municipal clerk numerous people who I knew from personal knowledge had DIED a number of years prior.

Not to mention, just because the voters on the registration list are still county residents doesn't mean it would not be a pain in the ass to LOCATE them for jury duty when they have moved within the county. How do you send them a letter, etc, when the address you have is outdated (as a significant percentage of addresses on voter reg. lists are?)

 
At 1:05 PM, triticale said...

We bought our house in Milwaukee July of 1997. My understanding was that it had been empty for 6 months before that. We tried for years to get former residents removed from the polling lists; one of them voted from our address in the 2000 primaries.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home