Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Lautenschlager’s Plan C: Babies Are Expense to Society

Today, current Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager asked a Federal Court to allow the State of Wisconsin to join a lawsuit to force the FDA to allow the “morning after” regimine to be sold over the counter.

This is, at best, a questionable use of scarce Wisconsin criminal justice funds.

A look at her arguments regarding the necessity of more aborted babies shows a more grotesque moral ambivalence toward life in general.

From JSOnline’s Daywatch:

Some abortion opponents object to the drug because they consider it to be a chemical abortion and have concerns about the drug's impact on women's health.

But the difficulty in obtaining the drug has had a negative impact on Wisconsin taxpayers, with the state's Medicaid program covering many of the financial costs of unintended pregnancies, Lautenschlager said.

"The politics of the federal government in keeping a faction of the radical right happy is essentially impacting the health of many young female Wisconsin residents and it's costing us money as taxpayers," Lautenschlager said.

Wow.

So, Peg Lautenschlager looks at babies born as the result of unintended pregnancies merely by their impact on the state’s social services budget.

They are financial liabilities. Not potential teachers, doctors, mechanics, paramedics…

It’s not important if these ‘costs of unintended pregnancies’ grow up to enjoy life, become educated, fall in love, marry, have a family, have children of their own…

It matters not if they get jobs, create jobs, pay taxes, and contribute to society.

Damn it, they’re a huge burden on the taxpayer.

Even those who consider themselves pro-choice surely have a problem looking at children, born children, in such a cold and calculating manner.

Forget the drunk driving and the misuse of state owned car. This callous, disgusting, reprehensible comment alone shows she does not deserve the honor of being Wisconsin’s top law enforcement official.

6 Comments:

At 8:48 PM, Seth Zlotocha said...

The economic cost to society is just one of the issues highlighted by Lautenschlager, and not even the central one.

Here is a more complete statement on this issue by Lautenschlager:

"The negative effects of withholding approval of this drug over political--not scientific or other legitimately accepted grounds--are far reaching, hurting not only victims of rape who might be in need of emergency contraception, but the greater community health, the economy and the fundamental right to justice."

Besides, the real issue here is that top FDA administrators are playing politics with this issue to cater to the whims of the White House despite the fact that FDA researchers (not to mention independent doctors and researchers in the field) gave full approval for the drug to be over the counter long ago. The issue is not a lone aspect of the Wisconsin AG's explanation for joining the case.

 
At 10:56 AM, Anonymous said...

Fraley, why do you mistate such easily verifiable stuff. Jeez. amateur hour, really.

 
At 10:59 AM, Anonymous said...

Will Peg sue the government if and when this drug is allowed and more women die from its use?

 
At 11:29 AM, Anonymous said...

Actually, of all the optinions, childbirth carries the greatest risk of death or serious health problem. just fyi

 
At 6:29 PM, Dad29 said...

The drug harms at LEAST one member of society; and there is some question as to whether it may be harmful to the moms, too.

I note that Keg Lift-und-Schlepp-Em does not concern herself with the cost of, say, illegal aliens who are receiving State-subsidized mortgages...

 
At 9:22 PM, Anonymous said...

Choice of words is interesting. A fetus is a "member of society?"

Where does this comne from?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home