Send via SMS

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Wineke Reveals 2006 Strategy

Either Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Joe Wineke has extremely bad timing or really bad judgment.

Ok, it’s both.

But what I really want to know is this: Did Wineke pen this pathetic column suggesting Republicans are categorically corrupt because of a scum bag Washington lobbyist named Jack Abramoff and pending charges against two GOP state legislators --- before or after Georgia Thompson was indicted by the U.S. Attorney for rigging a state bidding process to favor major donors to Doyle’s campaign?

Knowing Wineke he’ll probably come back with a snappy reply like, “Georgia Thompson is innocent until proven guilty.” To which I’d say, “Good Joe, now that we’ve got that straight, why don’t’ we tally the political corruption convictions in Wisconsin by party?”

Yeah, I think Joe’s really onto something with the corruption theme, especially considering the ongoing federal grand jury investigation into Jim Doyle’s campaign fundraising. The trick will be to increase Jack Abramoff’s name recognition to surpass Jim Doyle’s, and then convince voters that a Congressional Aide legally accepting a pair of tickets to a Milwaukee Bucks game from an Abramoff associate is worse than Governor Doyle taking tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions in exchange for taxpayer funded contracts.

I don’t know how Wisconsin Democrats feel, but I for one am really glad their party is in Joe Wineke’s capable hands.

7 Comments:

At 10:20 PM, Interloper said...

George Thompson was hired by the former Republican governor, so I'm sure this must say something about Republican hiring practices, correct?

 
At 10:53 AM, mkeresident said...

not at all interloper. If this was truly about a bad person and not about a bad administration then her inappropriate behavior would have happened and been revealed under the Republican administration. It didn't and wasn't.

 
At 11:18 AM, grumps said...

Ok, MKE, I was following your argument right up until, "If this." Then you kind of veered there for a moment.

 
At 11:56 AM, getitright said...

Actually interloper's comment was the one that was baffling

 
At 9:35 PM, urnotthatsmart said...

the real question is will the thompson charges matter. a first year law student would tell you that the evidence is weak and the allegations do not support the legal theory. its a slip and fall lawyer pretending to be a prosecutor- trying to get a quick plea. it won't play out. it will be an education watching a two-bit political hack u.s. attorney in wisconsin pretend to be in the same league as fitzgerald.

 
At 7:37 AM, getitright said...

urshortofmemory, urnotthatsmart: ask gary George and the three Milwaukee aldermen how lousy a prosecutor he is.

 
At 12:34 PM, Christopher Robin said...

Georgia Thompson's indictment is small potatoes when you consider how deep the Doyle 'cabal' {if it works when describing neocons, why not use it with kept men}is involved in the revelations of the Jensen defense.

Doyle claims he never read or was briefed on the investigations involving his campaign meanager-he also doesn't plan to read them. Days after his zero tolerance comments.

Either he was an incompetent manager of DOJ when he was AG or he turned a blind eye to his buddies indiscretions. Either way he doesn't look good.

Kept man--beholden to for financcial support regardless of personal and logical beliefs. I.E.
WEAC, Trial lawyers, Indian gaming.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home