Scott Walker is Born Again
Tuesday Scott Walker’s rudderless campaign for Governor took a decided turn for the worse.
Armed with only a handful of Cheetos, Walker started a Republican food fight with opponent Mark Green, when he called on Green to return nearly $30,000 in campaign contributions he got from Tom Delay’s PAC from 1997 to 2003. Walker claimed that Green needed to return the money in order to purify himself so that he could appropriately wage attacks on Jim Doyle’s fundraising practices.
To his credit, Mark Green’s Campaign did not release their own arsenal of over-ripe tomatoes in response.
So I have a few questions for Scott Walker.
1. When and how did the 38 year old professional politician become pure? Was it divine intervention? A belated Christmas miracle? Or was it just more of the unprincipled posturing that is becoming all too common among alleged conservatives lately?
2. When did he decide that Wisconsinites expect purity from their politicians? I think they‘d be delighted with leaders who are simply not corrupt.
The fact is, Jim Doyle’s fundraising is under scrutiny because of the appearance of a “quid pro quo,” which is Latin for give me money if you want a lucrative state travel contract or permanent gaming compacts.
Walker has personal experience with such questions of impropriety. In 2004 the U.S. Attorney looked into the process by which a $100 million bond deal was awarded to the employer of some of Walker’s major campaign contributors. Walker didn’t return any of the $25,000 raised at a Chicago event that followed the bond deal, even after three of the donors were indicated for a bribery and kickback scheme involving government officials in Illinois.
Green on the other hand accepted money from a fellow Republican House member. This fellow House member was recently indicted by a politically motivated Democrat Prosecutor in Texas. Walker is not suggesting that Green did anything wrong in accepting these contributions over the course of time. There’s no quid pro quo here, nor is there any evidence that the money Delay gave Green was obtained illegally. Still the new “purer than you” Walker has declared the need for some higher standard when it comes to political fundraising.
Forget about principles like innocent until proven guilty and the freedom to associate with others without fear of retribution. Our leaders simply can not be trusted to do the right thing, so we must eliminate all political fundraising during the state budget process. Perhaps we should eliminate political contributions altogether and fund elections entirely with taxpayer dollars.
Walker’s new platform is starting to sound more compatible with the "People’s Legislature Party" headed by Ed Garvey and Nino Amato. Maybe Walker should consider running as “the People’s Candidate”. That way he can continue to give Doyle the ammunition he needs to inoculate himself against allegations of real corruption, in what appears to be an orchestrated effort by his administration to extort money from businesses and special interest groups who want to do business with the state.
I have known Mark Green since 1989 and I am a contributor to his campaign for Governor.


3 Comments:
Green'S issue is that he vacuumed up as much PAC money from Federal PACs as he could and then transferred all the Federal PAC money to his state fund. He could have never raised that kind of PAC money in Wisconsin.
Why?
Because it would be illegal. In fact the State has made it illegal because of Green's gross misuse of a loophole. Now that's integrity.
Worse he took PAC money from "corrupt" politicians who's mug shots are on all the nightly news programs including FOX.
In the end the Pot and the Kettle are both black.
Mke Tidbits,
You are, of course, dead wrong.
You assert that Green could never have raised as much PAC money in Wisconsin.
" He could have never raised that kind of PAC money in Wisconsin. "
Well... in Wisconsin each PAC can give more than $43,000 to a gubernatorial campaign. Fed PACs can give only $5000 to a congressional campaign.
Dozens of Fed PACs are co-reistered as Wisconsin PACs.
You are, therefore, flat wrong.
Of course, if you are talking loopholes how 'bout soliciting corporate and tribal funds to the Democratic Governors Assoc. then having them transfer it to the DNC having the DNC ship it to Wisconsin Dem Party to be spent in the critical waning days of an election...maybe a million dollars worth? Who can say "Money Laundry"?
Shades of DeLay.
Deb, I really question why Wispolitics would give you this space to push Mark Green's candidacy and rip on Scott Walker. Is there something personal here? It's fine if you want to support Mark Green. However, instead of ripping on Scott Walker, why don't you just talk about why Mark Green would be a good Governor?
The title of your blog could also be constrewed as a swipe at Scott's faith in Christ. I think it's shameful that you did that and you ought to apologize.
Post a Comment
<< Home