Tide turning on marriage, civil union vote
Wisconsin is split down the middle on a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriages and civil unions, a new WisPolitics poll indicates.
It is entirely possible that conservatives outsmarted themselves by putting it on the November ballot, thinking it would tilt the governor's race toward Mark Green. It may, in fact, prompt heavy turnout in Madison and other liberal-leaning parts of the state, and could help defeat Green.
And the second sentence -- the overkill banning civil unions -- may be what kills the amendment. It is muddy enough that many believe it will apply to all sorts of domestic partnerships, not just the gays it is intended to discriminate against.
It's months away, of course, and the campaign hasn't really begun, but there is at least a chance that Wisconsin will become the first state to reject an anti-gay referendum.
One caveat: The WisPolitics poll, for some reason, did not screen for likely voters, which would be a much more reliable indicator of what might happen.


5 Comments:
What number is generally. Geez, that was frustating. I usally like to see the beakdown of party and other factors.
A lot of coservatives I know do not support the amendment. They are against it on what they'd say are conservative grounds.
Is there are number for "generally"?
Wait until seniors discover that the amendment will outlaw popular and informal living-together arrangements that are not marriages.
Gray Power and Gay Power could merge and turn the tide.
How the hell does one screen for "likely voters" in Wisconsin, with our dramatic swings in turnout from the newly eligible?
Campaigns do it all the time, with very accurate results.
When you interview people who are not registered and have no intention of voting, it does not tell you much.
The amendment should be supported.
Excuses to oppose that those in relationships other than marriage feel hard done by by not being able to call themselves "married" are ammusing. It is like a Dog complaining that it can't call himself a 'Cat".
As for Civil Unions, they legitimise nothing, and likewise should be opposed.
Perhaps society will someday decide to pander to the exceptions with a gay-union formality, but it should never be at the expense of marriage.
Post a Comment
<< Home