Jensen Backlash Hits Gard
So now it's State Rep. John Gard, (R-Peshtigo), Assembly Speaker and candidate for US Congress, who finds himself coping with the political blowback from Scott Jensen's political corruption convictions.
The two are long-time allies: Jensen was involved in Gard's initial, 1987 win in a special election, even campaigning in Gard's rural northeastern district from the back of a pickup truck.
Gard later followed Jensen into the Speaker's chair after Jensen was charged in the capital corruption scandal, and when Jensen stepped down as Speaker, Gard compensated him with key committee appointments, including a seat on the all-powerful and prestigious Committee on Joint Finance that Jensen still holds.
Now Gard has to decide whether to remove Jensen in the wake of the criminal convictions.
You'd think the resulting headline and decision - - "Gard Removes Convicted Felon From Top Legislative Committee" - - would be a no-brainer, but Gard is hesitating, putting himself in the center of the story.
Talk about a self-inflicted wound.
Jensen could do for Gard and the GOP what Harriet Miers and the Dubai World Ports did for Bush when the President found himself with self-generated political heat - - step aside and make things easier for the Boss or the party.
But Jensen's ill-advised decision to contest the charges and thereby revealing years of dirty GOP linen and inner-workings of an illegal campaign machine suggests his days as team player are behind him.
Jensen could use a resignation from Joint Finance, or a complete departure from the legislature, as a strategic signal of contrition to the judge prior to sentencing, but don't hold your breath.
The longer Jensen stays on Joint Finance, the more the focus remains on Gard.
Heck of a way to campaign for Congress, where ethics issues have also risen to the top.


1 Comments:
Steve Meyer and Steve Morgan are honorable men. Good
lawyers. Individually they had daunting cases. They
fought the good fight. They could have sought
publicity. Bailed on their respective clients when the
odds looked bad goodness knows they had ample
opportunity to do that – any time from October 2002
until March 2006. Instead, they took the high road
relying on a flawed justice system with harsh
consequences. What was missing in the news media
coverage is the passion these guys exhibited in the
courtroom on behalf of the accused.
Print journalists failed to explain to their readers
the fervor of the defense. Along with the smudged
newsprint there was plenty of redundancy in paragraphs
reminding us of the charges and a speculative if not
predictable outcome. We saw the projected results of
Power Point presentations lacking the dynamism of an
impassioned presenter. There was energy in the
courtroom, but the news didn’t pick up on it. As
sports announcers used to say, ‘The Thrill of Victory
and the Agony of Defeat’. The latter was clearly
evident on their countenance. Today the verdict
permitted removal of their individual cases from trial
to appellate court and a continuance of the defense.
It’s true. The defense never rests.
Post a Comment
<< Home