Sunday, July 31, 2005

Lawyers, guns and money

"Just Put Down That Law Suit, Pardner, and No One Gets Hurt."

Greg Palast, author of best-seller, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy," writes in The Guardian about why Congress felt compelled to act to protect gun makers from lawsuits.

Among his observations:

First, the score. Gunshot deaths in the US are way down - to only 88 a day. Around 87,000 lucky Americans were treated for bullet wounds last year; 32,436 unlucky ones died, including a dozen policemen by their own weapons. For Americans, America remains more deadly than Iraq.

Anti-immigrant politics are short-sighted

"Ugly doses of racism and xenophobia are glaringly evident in the open political hostility toward millions of illegal immigrants living in this country," Joel McNally writes in a Capital Times op ed.

But politicians and political parties who try to use anti-immigrant backlash for political gain will come to regret it in the long term, he says. Hope he's right.

Mark Green, meet Jessica Simpson

Rep. Mark Green has been to Iraq a couple of times, he'll have you know, and the worst thing about the war in Iraq isn't all of the people, military and civilians, getting killed there.

No, Green says that the worst thing is that we never hear any of the good news!And that is bad for morale, here and there.

Well, Jessica Simpson, one of Xoff's regular sources, went to Iraq, too, with her hubby.

And you know what?

When they showed her visit on a TV special, they didn't show any of the bad news!

So, as you can imagine, she is quite upset -- maybe not as upset as Mark Green, but upset nonetheless. She wants to know where that footage went.

Simpson says, "It was unbelievable. They didn't show a lot of what really went on with the enemy attacks and the shelling. There was so much stuff that went on and somehow the tapes got mysteriously misplaced."

Wonkette has the rest of the story.

Saturday, July 30, 2005

Whatever turns you on, I guess

F. Jim Sensenbrenner is one weird duck. The Wall Street Journal reports:

Last-Minute Deals Put CAFTA Over the Top

“The 217-215 tally officially recorded at 12:03 yesterday morning ended months of arm-twisting, wheedling, deal-cutting, pleading for party unity and chiding to put the national good ahead of parochial interests, all to push the Central American Free Trade Agreement, or CAFTA, through the House of Representatives. In the days leading up to the pivotal vote, administration officials joined the lobbying, at times granting personal favors or indulging personal pique.

How else to explain the pact with Wisconsin Republican James Sensenbrenner? While other lawmakers leveraged the looming vote for highway money, fund-raising commitments from party elders or side deals to protect textile producers, Mr. Sensenbrenner made an unusual request: a chance to gripe at Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.”[Wall Street Journal, 7/29/2005]
No word on what he wanted to chew on the Chamber about.


-- Pat Bagley, Salt Lake Tribune Posted by Picasa Click cartoon to enlarge

Quote, unquote

"The [concealed carry] bill plays Russian roulette with the lives of everyday citizens. It's a clay pigeon for Republicans who know that Democrat Doyle will veto the bill again. [State Sen. Dave] Zien and his Republican posse, rather than gunning for a serious anti-crime bill, will instead go fishing this summer, trolling for the gun lobby votes, hoping that an unwitting public will swallow the bait - hook, line and sinker."

-- Lois Moore in an op ed column in the Journal Sentinel.

Clinton, McCain can't win -- or can they?

Why Hillary Clinton and John McCain are winning the presidential buzz sweepstakes. David Shribman, executive editor of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, explains:

They're not as unalike as you think. They're not really from the states they represent. They're not really in the mainstream of their own parties. They're not really what they seem to be.

But they are the most intoxicating figures in American politics today -- and together they personify the problems the political establishment has as the 2008 campaign approaches and underline the power the conservative movement possesses.

Friday, July 29, 2005

Retaliation against deputy backfires


--Stuart Carlson cartoon, Journal Sentinel

Imagine how surprised Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke is to find that he has accidentally sentenced himself to ride the bus to the inner city, where he does a door-to-door patrol (at least while there are reporters around.)

His ill-conceived "plan" to curb violence in Milwaukee's central city has been shown to be a total sham since he ordered a lone deputy, who dared to criticize him, to conduct a one-man patrol. In an attempt to put out the media firestorm, Clarke has insisted that sending Deputy Michael Schuh out on patrol was part of a plan. As further proof, Clarke has spent some time on the beat himself the last two days.

That has pretty much had the effect of adding fuel to the fire, and keeping the story alive. Even the radio talkers have turned on him, although Charlie Sykes did make a feeble attempt today to say it's time to focus on the real problem, the murder rate in the inner city.

Clarke may have finally done himself in and exposed himself as a petty, egomaniacal dictator who can't take criticism and is willing to put one of his men at risk to get even.

The cartoon, and yesterday's editorial were right on the money. Clarke has badly wounded himself, and it may be fatal to his political ambitions -- or even keeping the job he has.

FINAL THOUGHT: Someone asked me today what I thought would have happened if Police Chief Arthur Jones had pulled this stunt.

UPDATE: DAMAGE CONTROL. Clarke says he will assign Schuh a partner, since the publilc seems to want that. Surely he'll be able to find someone else who's ripe for retaliation. Clarke apparently tired of showing up in the central city himself, after two days. Schuh correctly calls it "damage control."Story.

Feingold: Energy bill eases

access to bomb-grade uranium

Blogger Russ Feingold at DailyKos:

There were a lot of reasons to vote against the final version of the fiscally irresponsible energy bill in the Senate today. The bill does little to help consumers or lower gasoline prices and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. That's not to mention the billions of dollars in tax breaks and other subsidies to the oil and gas industry, which is reaping record profits while consumers are paying more and more at the pump.

But one thing that happened to the bill in the conference committee was particularly startling to me today. A provision was tucked into the 1,700 page energy bill conference report that would ease export restrictions on bomb-grade uranium. This was a provision I and a majority of my colleagues in the Senate opposed last month but it was included in the final bill.

Group asks ethics probe of Sensenbrenner

The Alliance for Justice, a DC-based advocacy group, has asked the House Ethics Committee to open an investigation of Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, alleging that the Wisconsin Republican violated ethics rules by attempting to influence a decision in an appeals court case in Chicago.

In a letter dated Wednesday, Nan Aron, president of the group, requested the investigation, the Appleton Post-Crescent reports.

As you may recall, the Chicago Tribune reported July 10 that Sensenbrenner had demanded that the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago give a longer prison sentence to a drug courier. Earlier post.

Frist sees the light, supports stem cell bill;

"It's not a matter of faith, but of science'

Sen. Bill Frist, the Republican majority leader who has been trying to round up the votes to stop a bill expanding stem cell research, has decided to support the bill.

The AP reports:

Frist Breaks With Bush on Stem-Cell Bill

By H. JOSEF HEBERT
The Associated Press
Friday, July 29, 2005; 9:44 AM

WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist on Friday threw his support behind legislation to expand federal financing for embryonic stem cell research, breaking with President Bush and religious conservatives in a move that could impact his prospects for seeking the White House in 2008.

"It's not just a matter of faith, it's a matter of science," Frist said on the floor of the Senate.

Frist, a heart-lung transplant surgeon who opposes abortion, said modifying Bush's strict limitations on stem cell research would lead to scientific advances and "bridge the moral and ethical differences" that have made the issue politically charged.

UPDATE: Frist explains his decision in Good Morning America interview .

With friends like Mark Green,

our veterans don't need enemies

As a combat veteran, I am more than a little tired of politicians who run for office as great patriots because they are for war. That goes double for the Chicken Hawks who never served themselves but have no hesitation about sending someone else's kids off to war.

Which brings me to Congressman Mark Green, the non-veteran, founder of the Victory in Iraq caucus in the House of Representatives, the guy who says we shouldn't even talk about when we might bring our troops home, the guy who says things are going great in Iraq, and morale among the troops and the population is really high, but the news media never tell us the good news.

Granted, more US casualities, terrorist attacks and suicide bombings in that country, more than two years after President Bush declared victory, do seem more newsworthy to the media than the work our troops are doing to rebuild the country. That should come as no surprise.

A bigger surprise is how Green, who has visited Iraq himself a couple of times and presents himself as the troops' best buddy, has failed to support those troops.

Wisconsin has about 3,500 troops in Iraq and Afghanistan right now, and almost 500,000 veterans in the state, according to the VA and Defense Department.

Nationally, 500,000 veterans and members of the National Guard and Reserve are locked out of the VA health care system because of arbitrary enrollment requirements put in place by the Bush administration. That includes 7,937 in Wisconsin.

In Wisconsin, more than 3,000 veterans must pay the disabled vets' tax, which takes a dollar from their pensions for every dollar they receive in disability benefits.

There is a backlog of about 500,000 claims in Wisconsin, including those from veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. The average wait for disabled vets here to get a disability assessment is 167 days.

Against that backdrop, how has Veterans Champion Mark Green performed?

Here's what his campaign website says:
Supporting our Troops – In 2002, Mark Green cast his vote in favor of a bipartisan resolution authorizing the use of force against Iraq (H.J.Res. 114, President signed on 10/16/2002). Since that time he has consistently supported increased funding for our military – this includes higher pay, better armor, and the best equipment available for our brave men and women in uniform (H.R.1268, passed by House of Representatives on 3/16/2005). Mark Green has also visited Wisconsin troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, Walter Reed Medical Center and those home in Wisconsin.
That's really touching, but voting for the war and visiting the hospital should not be confused with supporting the troops.

Republican leaders have tried to cut health care benefits for our veterans, refused to expand health care for men and women in the National Guard and Reserves, and rejected measures to keep them safe when they are fighting overseas. Green has voted with the GOP every time.

When he's home for the August recess, traveling the state looking for votes for governor next year, veterans and their families might want to ask him about this record, although it pretty much speaks for itself:

Green Opposed Expanding TRICARE to National Guard & Reserve Volunteers. Green voted against expanding access to the military’s TRICARE health insurance program to all reservist and National Guard members. The proposal would have expanded military health care to provide access to members of the Guard and Reserve and their families for a low fee. [HR 1815, Roll Call #221, 5/25/05.]

Green Opposed $150 Million Increase for Military Personnel. In 2005, Green voted against a budget proposal to increase funding for military health care by $100 million and transitional job training for military personnel by $50 million. [HR 1268, Roll Call #76, 3/16/05.]
Green Voted Against Additional Job Assistance to Veterans Returning from Overseas. Green opposed efforts to provide extra job training assistance to veterans who are returning from overseas. Four out of 10 members of the Guard and Reserve forces lose income when they leave their civilian jobs for active duty, and many are self-employed or run small businesses. This means they face the daunting task of reestablishing their businesses after their release from active duty. [HR 27, Roll Call #47, 3/2/05; 109th Congressional Record, pg. H915, 3/2/05;109th Congressional Record, pg. H2074, 4/14/05]

Green Refused To Consider $2.6 Billion Increase in VA Health Care Funding. Green repeatedly voted to block efforts to increase VA funding by about $2.5 billion. Republicans finally admitted that they had underfunded veterans’ health care by $3.7 billion over the next two years. [H.R.2528, #223,5/26/05; H CON RES 95, #82, 3/17/05; H.J.Res. 107, #478, 9/29/04; Washington Post 6/24/05; AP 6/28/05] [Earlier post, "Green voted for vets' health care -- after he voted against it." ]

Dan Finley's surprise exit

Dan Finley, the Waukesha County executive who once had visions of being governor, says he is leaving political life for good to become the head of the troubled Milwaukee Public Museum, the Journal Sentinel reports.

It is a shocker, although former Lt. Gov. Margaret Farrow tells the Journal Sentinel that Finley has been saying for some time that he wanted to do something else with his life.

The task he's taking on is certainly a challenge and a total change of direction. I can only speculate about what happened to cause him to lose his appetite for politics. But many people will understand the desire to have one more, totally different career from the one they've had into their middle years. That may be the simple explanation for Finley, who says he hopes this will be the job he retires from.

The political bug may still have infected the Finley household, however. His wife says she may run for county exec. Story. And Jessica McBride/Bucher is already beating the drums for a Jenifer Finley candidacy on her blog. She mentions Mary Bono and Elizabeth Dole as role models, but Hillary Clinton doesn't make the list.

Thursday, July 28, 2005

Nelson memorial service on C-Span Saturday


The memorial service for former Gov. and Sen. Gaylord Nelson will be broadcast on C-Span at 7 p.m. CDT Saturday, July 30, on C-Span's "American Perspectives" series.

The event, which drew 4,000 people to the Capitol, was the largest such service since a 1925 tribute to Robert M. (Fighting Bob) LaFollette.

Other resources: An excellent slide show by the Capital Times, and a good quality webcast from Wisconsin Public Television via WisPolitics.

If anyone still wishes to make a contribution as a memorial to Gaylord Nelson, the family has suggested the following organizations:

Gaylord Nelson Memorial Fund
c/o The Wilderness Society
1615 M Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20036

Gaylord Nelson Chair,
Institute for Environmental Studies
c/o University of Wisconsin Foundation
P.O. Box 8860
Madison, WI 53708-8860

Friends of the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore
P.O. Box 1574
Bayfield, WI 54814

Gaylord Nelson Studio of WisconsinEye
P.O. Box 949
Madison, WI 53701


Finally, VHS or DVD copies of the service are available for purchase at a cost of $25 from Wisconsin Public Television. Interested people should contact Evey Fleming, WPT, 608-263-4575.

Senate GOP puts NRA ahead of troops

In case you missed it, Senate Republicans, fearing some unwanted amendments to the defense appropriations bill, moved the National Rifle Association's top priority ahead of the $491 billion defense bill, setting up a vote on legislation to shield firearms manufacturers and dealers from lawsuits over gun crimes.

Completion of the defense bill, which the Senate had been debating for a week, will now be delayed until fall. If you had any doubt about GOP priorities, now you know.

From The Gun Guys:

Does anyone support the gun immunity bill? Okay, let's qualify that. Does anyone who doesn't thinking owning a tank is a constitutional right support the gun immunity bill? We're just wondering, because just about every editorial page in America is trouncing the NRA's logic. We haven't read reviews this bad since Battlefield Earth came out.

"When this misguided immunity bill comes up for a vote, responsible senators must find a way to head it off or to summon the courage to vote no." The New York Times

"Outrageous." New Jersey Herald News

"That the Senate would turn away from important national security legislation to deal with a special plea from a powerful lobbying group is unsavory enough. But, just as important, the bill itself is both unnecessary and harmful." The Christian Science Monitor

"Politicians too often put the interests of the powerful gun lobby over the people they're elected to represent and protect. The U.S. Senate is poised to do it again." Detroit Free-Press

"Why would gun-makers deserve legal immunity and not the manufacturers, say, of lawn mowers? Answer: the NRA's political clout. The irony is that the Senate postponed work on a defense bill to consider gun legislation that will assure America's streets remain unsafe." Philadelphia Inquirer

" If the NRA and Mr. Frist had had their way, Bull's Eye Shooter Supply, the gun dealer that negligently allowed the Bushmaster rifle to reach the hands of Washington snipers John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, would not have been successfully sued by families of six victims and the two victims who survived the ambushes." The Washington Post

"The Senate should turn back latest attempt to shield gun industry from legal action." Indianapolis Star

"Apparently, the National Rifle Association, which has pushed for this bill for years, has more clout in Congress than do the troops who are fighting for their country." Winston-Salem Journal
But the greatest quote of all comes from those zany liberals in Florida (can you smell the sarcasm seeping out of your monitor). From the Sarasota Herald-Tribune: "Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist doesn't need fancy electronic gizmos to keep track of his schedule. It appears the National Rifle Association does it for him."


To the Guns Guys' collection I would add: "This dangerous measure deserves defeat." Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

UPDATE: One piece of good news. The Senate did adopt an amendment by Sen. Herb Kohl to require child trigger locks to be included with every handgun purchase. It passed 70-30. Reuters report. JS story.

Taking it to Frist where it hurts

StemPAC, a new political action committee working to promote stem cell research, has its sights on Sen. Bill Frist, the Republican majority leader, who is stalling on scheduling a bill to expand stem cell research.
Click here to see the ad.

The bill passed the House with quite a bit of GOP support, and there are more than enough Senate supporters to pass it -- if it ever comes to a vote. President Bush has promised to veto it, and Frist is working frantically to keep it from ever reaching Bush's desk.

In hopes of getting Frist's attention, and maybe even getting him out of the way of a vote, StemPAC has begun running a television commercial -- not in Frist's home state of Tennessee, but in New Hampshire. That, of course, is where the presidential sweepstakes begin, and Frist would like to be president. Not a bad strategy. If it doesn't move Frist, maybe it will move some public opinion away from him. And that could get his attention.

Quote, unquote

Saddam Hussein is seeking a change of venue for his trial. Where on the planet could he possibly get a fair trial? Okay, maybe LA, but that’s it.

-- Will Durst, The Progressive.

Solidarity Later: Molly Ivins on labor split

"You may think the AFL-CIO split is none of your beeswax, but if you work in this country, you owe labor, big time. And I'm talking to you, white-collar worker."
The irrepressible Molly Ivins on the current internal debate in organized labor, and what it might mean for those who work for wages in this country, union members or not.

Badgers toe party lines on CAFTA

The Bush administration scrambled to eke out a two-vote victory on CAFTA early Thursday.

"Although the deal was approved by the Senate last month, it was overwhelmingly opposed by House Democrats who contend that it is wrong to strike a free-trade pact with poor countries lacking strong protection for worker rights. Only 15 of the 202 House Democrats backed the accord, while 27 out of 232 Republicans voted against," the Washington Post reports.
The sausage-making wasn't pretty:

The last-minute negotiations for Republican votes resembled the wheeling and dealing on a car lot. Republicans who were opposed or undecided were courted during hurried meetings in Capitol hallways, on the House floor and at the White House. GOP leaders told their rank and file that if they wanted anything, now was the time to ask, lawmakers said, and members took advantage of the opportunity by requesting such things as fundraising appearances by Cheney and the restoration of money the White House has tried to cut from agriculture programs. Lawmakers also said many of the favors bestowed in exchange for votes will be tucked into the huge energy and highway bills that Congress is scheduled to pass this week before leaving for the August recess.

The Wisconsin delegation split right down the middle, along party lines, with the four Dems voting no and all four Repubs voting yes.

UPDATE: The vote was even closer. Rep. Charles Taylor (R-NC), a CAFTA opponent recorded as "not voting," has issued a statement saying he voted no. Is there one more out there?

Clarke tries damage control -- and fails

Day 3 of David Clarke's campaign to end killings in Milwaukee's central city:

Clarke, trying to mitigate the disaster he's created, takes my advice and goes into the central city himself, accompanying the deputy he sentenced to conduct a one-man foot patrol in Milwaukee's most dangerous neighborhood. Too late. The cameras and reporters were all there the day before.

[UPDATE: Radio news reported this morning that Clarke was on a bus on his way to Schuh's beat, apparently to walk it with him.]

And the deputy, Michael Schuh, says Clarke started off by reprimanding him for the way he's running the one-man patrol, although he was given no guidance, no partner, no squad car and almost no notice of the new assignment -- which came after Schuh wrote something critical of Clarke in a union newsletter.

The union, meanwhile, filed a federal lawsuit, which you can read about in today's story.

It says that Schuh, 55, "has suffered damage to his reputation, real and probable injury to his person, extreme mental anguish (and) physical suffering." It demands that Schuh be returned to his previous position as a bailiff. It also asks for damages and attorney's fees. Schuh's attorney, Jonathan Cermele, said Wednesday that He hopes"in the short-term .. .the sheriff will recognize that what he has done is inappropriate, and if he doesn't assign him back as a bailiff, he will at least provide proper police presence (for the new assignment)."

And a majority of the members of the Couonty Board signed a letter to Clarke, saying Clalrke should reconsider the blatantly shortsighted, irresponsible and potentially dangerous move of placing a deputy as a one-man foot patrol in the streets."

They blasted Clarke for duplicating city of Milwaukee police service and supporting a "senseless" approach to dealing with the area's homicide crisis. The letter goes on to call Clarke's actions "appalling, valueless, and completely unacceptable."

"On a personal level, we find it shameful and disgraceful that you publicly belittle a decorated Vietnam veteran on a disagreement that could have been handled within the Department," the letter adds.

All in a day's work for Fearless Leader David Clarke.

VIEW FROM THE INSIDE. This blog gives a sense how Clarke's deputies feel about his leadership style.

Who's needling now, needlessly?

I hesitate to mention this because it's one of those non-issues the right likes to stir up to keep everyone's attention off what really matters -- like the positive impact Jim Doyle's budget vetoes this week will have on countless kids and adults in Wisconsin. But I feel compelled to comment because of all of the dust that has been kicked up already.

The facts, briefly: When Doyle was in Door County for an event recently, a woman whose daughter suffers from diabetes gave a Doyle aide a package of 1,400 used hypodermic needles (a one-year supply) and asked that the package be delivered to Speaker John Gard. There was a note or letter to Gard inside, asking him to stop his opposition to embryonic stem cell research, which many believe could lead to a cure for diabetes.

A Doyle staffer delivered it to Gard's office. Doyle's press office says they called Gard's office first to alert them to the delivery. When Capitol cleaning staff refused to remove the package from Gard's office, Gard's staff called the Capitol Police.

Big deal, right? Well, to hear the Gard office tell it, Doyle "put his staff in danger, our staff in danger, and the cleaning staff in danger."

“This is a woman whose daughter has juvenile diabetes, they wanted to let their representative know what they’re going through every single day, so when the speaker casts his votes on stem cell research he knows what its like for their family,” Doyle spokesman Dan Leistikow said. “And instead of listening to them he called the cops.”

“Sending anthrax to people is not free speech either. There are people who get big money to dispose of medical waste,” Gard's staffer said.

What sort of danger did these needles pose to anyone? Calling them "medical waste" is clever, but my guess is that the way those needles are usually disposed of is that the family throws them in the trash every day. No one is going to "catch" diabetes. People do spread HIV and hepatitis by sharing needles, but unless Gard or his staff was planning to re-use them, that would not seem to be an issue. And the 12-year-old girl in question has diabetes, not HIV or hepatitis. (The anthrax comparison should get the spinster a raise from Gard, but in real life it has nothing to do with the matter at hand.)

Then there is the Capitol police officer, who called the woman who sent the needles and warned her that if she did something like that again she might be arrested. He neglected to say on what grounds. What charge would that be, exactly?

Here's the police report. See what you think. It may not have been the wisest thing Doyle's office has ever done. But people will die of diseases because Gard and Co. continue to block stem cell research. Gard and his staff won't die from looking at a hypodermic needle, or even 1,400 of them.

UPDATE. This gets sillier and sillier as conservatives try to keep it alive. Jessica McBride/Bucher says the woman who gave Doyle the needles is facing a worthless check charge, as if that is somehow relevant? (I guess her credibility is shot. Her daughter probably doesn't have diabetes, and the needles are from her heroin addiction?) If you look at the details on CCAP, you'll see the charge was dismissed on Wednesday.)

And she agrees with the Capitol police officer who says he could have charged the woman for disorderly conduct? I'm not in the law enforcement business, and McBride/Bucher is married to a DA, but I guess I fail to see how a Capitol police officer could charge a woman in Door County with anything when she was never anywhere near the Capitol and did not personally deliver anything to anybody there.

UPDATE: I am not in the habit of responding to comments and don't want to begin answering individual ones now. But some of them clearly suggest people have not read or understood what happened. The woman in Door County didn't send a package to anyone. She hand-delivered it to a Doyle staffer and asked that it be delivered to Gard. It was clear where the package originated and that it was not intended as any kind of threat or terrorism. She may not have used good judgment, nor did the gov's office. But I don't think she needs to be detained at Gitmo until we win the war on terrorism, nor do I think she needs to be confined to a mental institution. She was trying to get Gard's attention, and she certainly did that. I don't think this stunt is likely to change his mind, however. Can we move on now and stop the killing in Iraq, for example?

Great Lakes need Nelson's vision again

"Once it seemed we could only destroy the water in our rivers, but now we are organized, and mechanized, and automated, and now we are embarked on a systematic campaign to destroy the greatest source of fresh water on the face of the earth -- the Great Lakes themselves." -- Gaylord Nelson, 1965.
Nelson wasn't being an alarmist when he issued that warning 40 years ago. In large part because of his efforts, the tide of pollution in the Great Lakes was reversed, at least temporarily, and steps were taken to protect our amazing water resource. The Great Lakes contain 90% of the nation's fresh water supply and about one-fifth of the fresh surface water in the world.

Despite their mammoth size, the Great Lakes' eco-system is fragile.

Jim Rowen, in a Capital Times op ed, connects Nelson's legacy with the current US-Canada water agreement, which needs our attention.

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Marines return to Iraq,

Bush returns to the ranch


William Rivers Pitt writes at Truthout.org:

Even maniacs need time to reload, but it is a rare quirk in history when they all run out at the same time, and anyone who has spent any time around wars will tell you that a sudden calm, for no reason, is almost always a time to get braced.-- Hunter S. Thompson, January 20, 1986

The First Marine Expeditionary Force, which took part in the initial invasion of Iraq more than two years ago, is suiting up for another deployment to the war zone. For many in this vaunted crew, it will be their third deployment to that country since all of this began.

And George W. Bush is heading off for another month-long vacation in Texas.

One thousand, seven hundred and eighty-four American soldiers have been killed in Iraq since the Marines first landed two years ago. Thirty nine of those deaths have taken place in the month of July. The civilian casualties in Iraq have skyrocketed. The man who has run the Baghdad morgue for the last 15 years, Faik Amin Baker, says, "Before the war we used to get maybe 250 bodies a month. Now it is 800 or 900 a month from the Baghdad area alone. The situation has worsened dramatically. We cannot cope."

And George is going on vacation, again.
Read it all.

Greenwashing Wal-Mart: It won't work

This from our friends at Grist, the online environmental magazine:

Between the Devil and the Deep Green Supercenter
Wal-Mart building two experimental green stores

Mega-giganto retailer Wal-Mart is conducting an experiment. No, not the world-domination experiment, a different one: It's constructing two "Supercenters" with green-building features designed to reduce energy and water use.

The first, in Texas, will have solar cells embedded in skylights; runoff waste water will be captured and reused; heat from refrigeration units will warm water for the bathroom sinks; waste oil from the garage and food-service areas will be burned in a radiant floor-heating system; energy-efficient LED lights will illuminate the low-paid, uninsured, non-unionized Wal-Mart "associates" on the floor below.

After three years, the results of the experiment will be assessed by independent agencies and shared publicly, and the most successful elements will be used in other Supercenters and likely in other big-box retail stores. "The No. 1 rule in retail is to get people in and have them hang around for a while," said Rick Fedrizzi of the U.S. Green Building Council. "In green spaces you have a sense of well-being." The move is, suffice to say, unlikely to mollify Wal-Mart's critics in the environmental and labor movements. LA Times story.

Green wants to debate deficit? Can't wait

Was that really Rep. Mark Green, lecturing Gov. Jim Doyle in a news release about budget deficits and fiscal responsibility?

Does Green think he's going to get a free pass or start with a clean slate as a candidate for governor, and never be held accountable for his record as a legislator at the state and federal levels?

The opposition researchers won't have to dig too deep to find a long record of Green voting for huge spending increases and record deficits -- first in the Assembly, as a member of the Republican leadership when Gov. Tommy Thompson was spending us into the deficit Doyle inherited, and later in the House of Representatives, where he has voted for Bush budgets, tax breaks for the rich at our expense, and the biggest deficit spending programs in history.

If Green wants to debate deficit spending and fiscal responsibility, Doyle and the Democrats will be happy to have him bring it on.

UPDATE: Dem Party release on the subject.

Doyle's "mainstream Republican" budget

It is a backhanded compliment, to be sure, but the Capital Times, a frequent critic of Gov. Jim Doyle, editorializes today in favor of sustaining Doyle's 139 budget vetoes.

The Cap Times basically says that Doyle did the best he could with what he had to present the legislature with a reasonable budget proposal -- one the paper calls "a mainstream Republican proposal in the tradition - if not the precise form - of those advanced by past governors such as Warren Knowles and Lee Sherman Dreyfus."

When the GOP-run legislature got through with it, it was a partisan budget filled with pork for special interests. The Cap Times had urged Doyle to veto the whole thing.

But Doyle's creative vetoes restored some sanity and fairness, leading the Cap Times to conclude:

[T]he vetoes the governor made have produced a better budget than the one he was handed by the Legislature. It is more in tune with Wisconsin values and, frankly, it is more in tune with mainstream Republican values.

Prediction: Those on the left looking for more reasons to pick a fight with Doyle, who's not liberal enough for them, will use the Cap Times "mainstream Republican" language against him.

The Clarke caper: Retaliation, pure and simple

Another day of the David Clarke saga, and another 42 column inches of newsprint, not counting the two photos, in the Journal Sentinel.

What do we know that we didn't know yesterday about Clarke's vindictive decision to send a lone deputy, Michael Schuh, on a foot patrol in Milwaukee's central city?

We know that Schuh's claim that Clarke is escorted by armed deputies when he goes to the airport is true, and that he has deputies check his home when he is out of town. Clarke says he ordered his house checked because he has had death threats. And deputies accompany him at Mitchell Field because he is unarmed, he said.

Most of us at Mitchell Field are unarmed, if we have any expectation that we will get through the metal detector and screening to board our flight. Does the sheriff think someone is lying in ambush at Mitchell Field, hoping he'll walk through some day so they can carry out their death threat? Or will they carry out their death threat at his home when he's out of town?

We also know that Clarke both agrees that Schuh's assignment is "high risk," but says Schuh should not be afraid. "This isn't about him," Clarke said, but about neighborhood safety.

Of course it's about Schuh, who got the one-man foot patrol assignment after criticizing Clarke in a union newsletter. It is retaliation, pure and simple.

Asked by the paper if he had retaliated against Schuh, Clarke didn't deny it, but simply said the courts would decide that. The deputies union has filed a complaint. Even given the uncertainties of any legal case, this one seems like a slam dunk. If Schuh's assignment is about neighborhood safety and not about him, where are the other deputies? Off patrolling the freeway, that's where.

And we know that Clarke continues to threaten retaliation against anyone who challenges or criticizes him.

"One cannot expect, internally, that if they make some criticism against the sheriff that they will never be reassigned, that they will be immune from accountability," Clarke said. Never be reassigned? How about immediately reassigned?

As to whether Clarke is putting a deputy in unnecessary danger, let's just quote from the story again:

"The Milwaukee Police Department assigns foot patrols in pairs in high-crime central city areas because of concerns about officer safety," police spokeswoman Anne E. Schwartz said Tuesday.

Finally, there is this: Clarke, showing that he isn't immune from danger as sheriff, tells of making an arrest in 2003 of a man with a butcher knife, after being flagged down by a citizen. "In an act of selflessness, I put the community's safety first and I expect the people in this organization to do the same." He added: "Where was my backup?"

It is not extraordinary to expect a 20-year police veteran, who is armed, to respond to an emergency if he happens to be on the scene. That's what Clarke did. That's his job, even if he happens to be the head of the department.

That is far different from the situation he's put Schuh in, where he deliberately is exposing him to danger with no backup officer. The sheriff's department didn't even let Milwaukee police know of Schuh's new assignment in the central city, although MPD certainly knows about it now and says officers will look out for Schuh, as will off-duty sheriff's deputies.

This is not about courage, although David Clarke would like to make it so. I don't doubt Clarke's courage, and I certainly don't doubt Schuh's.

Clarke is right when he says that people should not be afraid to walk down the street in any neighborhood in Milwaukee. But that's not reality. Just a few days ago I read the story about the homeowner in a gang-infested neighborhood who does his yard and garden work at 6 a.m. and goes in the house for good by 10 a.m. every day.

If Clarke wants to make those streets and neighborhoods safe, he should sit down with Police Chief Nan Hegarty and put together a joint plan to do it, instead of acting like a rogue cop who makes his own rules,, retaliates if anyone questions him, and puts his own men in harm's way unnecessarily.

Previous post: "Clarke could show real leadership by patrolling central city himself." Folkbum's view.

UPDATE: Even the conservatives, like WTMJ talker Jeff Wagner and blogger Jessica McBride/Bucher, think Clarke has stepped way over the line. When they won't defend him, he is in real trouble.

Room for more on Dohnal's enemies list?

Bob Dohnal, who publishes something called the Wisconsin Conservative Digest (not sure, but it sounds a little right-wing, doesn't it?), came to the defense of poor beleaguered Tom Reynolds, the state senator everyone seems to be piling on latelty.

In his column, Dohnal lashes out at all sorts of whiny liberals.

Don't you just love it when you hear the Liberals whine? Who could be more proud of yourself when you are attacked by Spivak and Bice, the Milwaukee Journal, Jim McQuigan, Tony Staskunas, and Jim Sullivan?

Is there a bigger bunch of Liberal Whiners in the state than that bunch?

Aside from the question of who does the fact- and spell-checking for the Conservative Digest (The Milwaukee Journal has been out of business for years, and McGuigan's name didn't have a Q in it the last I knew), you have to marvel at this:

Spivak and Bice, the muckraking liberals from Milwaukee County, are also wonders to behold. As dedicated Secular/Socialists they hate any Christian who is also a conservative, and that is the nub of it.

I'm not sure why he qualified their Christian-hating credentials. Maybe Dohnal knows a liberal Christian who Spivak and Bice like?

Their Socialist bent will come as quite a shock to all of the liberals the Spice Boys have skewered in their column over the last several years.

And now to my real beef: Why aren't Gretchen Schuldt and I on the list? We've done our best to bash Reynolds at every opportunity. Guess we will just have to try harder. I'm sure there are a lot of other volunteers who would like recognition, too.

This is like getting left off the Nixon Enemies List. A lot of good liberals who didn't make the cut were never the same again.

Poll: Roberts up, Rove down

USA Today reports that Supreme Court nominee John Roberts, unknown a week ago, gets high favorable ratings in a CNN/Gallup/USA Today poll:

Roberts' favorable-unfavorable ratings are a muscular 46%-13%; 19% haven't heard of him.

In contrast, by 34% to 25%, Americans have an unfavorable view of Rove; 25% have never heard of him. Seen by many as Bush's most powerful White House adviser, Rove has been in the news lately because of an investigation into whether administration officials illegally leaked the name of a CIA operative to reporters.

The controversy hasn't gripped the public's attention. Just half of those surveyed say they are following the story closely; one in five aren't following it at all.

Even so, 25% think Rove broke the law in the case. An additional 37% suspect that he did something unethical but not illegal. Just 15% say they think he didn't do anything seriously wrong.

Those surveyed are split almost evenly, 40%-39%, over whether Bush should fire him. By 49% to 31%, a plurality says he should resign.

And the Democratic Party gets a 52% favorable rating, compared to 46% for the Rs.

Tommy's chip 'an abomination'

We (that's the editorial we, used so you think there are too many of us to fight) reported here last week that Tommy Thompson was having a chip implanted, and that some people thought that was the work of the devil.

Conservative/libertarian/whatever Geoff Metcalf takes Tommy to task for other reasons:

Former Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson is pimping for implanted microchips. Big flipping deal! Sigmund Freud advocated cocaine. Freud was an early advocate of cocaine, recommending it for a great many ailments, physical and mental, including, of all things, heroin addiction; latter, he reluctantly (and begrudgingly) admitted that this was perhaps not the wisest thing he ever did.

Thompson reportedly plans to promote sub dermal biochips, by having one implanted in his arm. Thompson’s promotion, linked no doubt by his joining the board of directors of VeriChip, is an abomination.

I’ve been complaining about sub dermal biochips since 1998. In addition to itching and moaning on the radio about the dangers of implanted biochips I have written tens of thousand words explaining the evisceration of the very concept of privacy. “Privacy—the very concept of privacy—becomes an anachronism”.

There is a long list of alleged ‘benefits’ of biochip implants. And like the list of 'benefits’ Freud touted for heroin and cocaine, they are wrong.


There's more. You can read it all here if you're so inclined.

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Rove's nickname too vulgar for our ears?

Click on strip to enlarge

A dozen newspapers have found President Bush's term of endearment for his brain, Karl Rove, to be offensive. No,he doesn't call his brain "Karl Rove," although that's an idea. Rather, he calls Karl Rove by the affectionate nickname of "Turd Blossom."

Who could take offense at that? A nickname chosen by our most Christian president, the one closest to God?

Where does he get these nicknames? Some think they are Divinely inspired. Others say, "You can take the boy out of the frat house, but ...

In any event, some editors refused to run the strip, or edited out the word. It seems like that might have ruined the joke, though. Here's the AP story.

In the interest of striking a blow for the First Amendment, let me say this: Turd! Poophead! Double Booger!

Boy, it almost made me feel Presidential.

(By the way. the Journal Sentinel, which runs the strip on its op ed page, let it all hang out.)

Sensenbrenner takes on water,

so he throws aide overboard

A House Judiciary counsel who played a key role in Rep. F. Jim Sensebrenner's meddling in a federal drug case in Chicago has lost his job, the Chicago Tribune reports.

Sensenbrenner, as reported here on July 10, contacted the chief appeals judge in Chicago and demanded a longer sentence for a convicted drug dealer.

That, of course, is a big no-no. The Trib reports:

Sensenbrenner could face a complaint before the House ethics committee, because House rules prohibit communicating privately with judges on legal matters. In addition, general rules of litigation prohibit contacting judges on a case without notifying all parties, which Sensenbrenner did not do.

The American Judicature Society, a non-partisan group that works for judicial independence, criticized Sensenbrenner after the letter became public for "attempting to bully federal judges."
Sensenbrenner hasn't admitted any wrongdoing, of course. But his aide, who reportedly brought the case to his attention, is gone.

And that, friends, is the American judicial system at work, as chaired by F. Jim Sensenbrenner.


UPDATE: Sensenbrenner's challenger, Bryan Kennedy, has asked the House Ethics Committee to investigate. Kennedy's letter.

Confused about Plame/Rove affair?

Garrison Keillor clears it all up

Is all of this talk about Valerie Plame (whose alias is Mrs. Wilson) getting a little too confusing for you? Having trouble keeping track of just who said what to whom, and what the President knew and when he knew it, if he in fact knew anything at all?

Well, don't worry your pretty little head about it. Garrison Keillor, of Prairie Home Companion fame, also writes a mean political analysis, as you'll find in the Chicago Tribune today. Some excerpts, just to give you a feel for his insight:

I feel it's time for me to step forward and tell what I know about Karl Rove's conversation with columnist Robert Novak in which Mr. Novak reportedly told Mr. Rove that CIA operative Valerie Plame had been responsible for her husband, Joseph Wilson, going to Niger to debunk the White House's claim that Saddam Hussein was shopping for uranium in Africa to make nuclear weapons and that's why we invaded Iraq, and Mr. Rove said, "Yes, I've heard that too." Mr. Rove has been accused of revealing the identity of a covert intelligence officer. This simply isn't true.. .

Later, after some background, we get this:

I called Sen. Kerry to alert him and he said he had heard that too, and then switched over to French and said, "My wife is a suitcase," or words to that effect.

Could Teresa Heinz Kerry be carrying uranium in a suitcase? Ms. Plame mentioned the possibility to the president and found Mr. Bush oddly detached. "Yes, I heard that," he said, vaguely. The radio receiver was still on his back but the earpiece had fallen out. As a young man, under cover of the National Guard, Mr. Bush had masterminded a clandestine CIA operation that infiltrated a ring of draft-dodgers and gathered important information about them, such as which bars they frequented and how much they drank. He is comfortable in an undercover role. He has cut many trails through the brush at his Crawford, Texas, ranch and can slip undetected over the Mexican border while his double, an El Paso Realtor named Craig Selin, stands in for him at press conferences and other ceremonial events.

Give yourself a break and read the whole thing.

Clarke could show real leadership

by patrolling central city himself

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke has been talking a lot lately about violence in Milwaukee's central city. Seventy-five people already have been murdered in Milwaukee this year, a 50% increase from 2004. Clarke is one of many voices saying that is unacceptable, and that the community must act to change the culture of violence.

Now we know Clarke's plan to stop the killings.

He is sending one white 55-year-old sheriff's deputy, alone and on foot, to patrol the central city.

Starting today, Deputy Michael Schuh's assignment is "to take a county bus to and from the neighborhood, contact every home and business, encourage cooperation with police and distribute a Sheriff's Department business card to those he contacts," the Journal Sentinel reports.

He does get to take a radio, and is supposed to communicate with the dispatcher every time he approaches a home or business. That will make it easier when Schuch needs backup, or when they need to recover his body. Schuh also will be allowed to keep his gun, I assume.

His new foot beat is bounded by North 10th and 27th Streets, between North Avenue and Burleigh. It's the kind of neighborhood where people roll up their car windows and lock their doors when they are driving through. If you think this is an exaggeration, swing by 10th and North or 15th and Burleigh next time you're in the hood.

Schuh, who says he will follow orders, is taking on a dangerous assignment. It's unheard of to send a law enforcement officer into such an area without a partner. Schuh is a Vietnam veteran, but he didn't go on one-man patrols.

What did he do to get this assignment? Schuh wrote an article for the union newsletter, criticizing Clarke. The newspaper reports:

Schuh penned an opinion column known as "The Sacred Cow" in the July issue of "The MDSA Star," the union's newsletter. In it, he said, he was responding to a written comment on roll call message boards that was viewed as questioning the
courage of some deputies.

Felber said that deputies were told Clarke authored the message-board comment, which cited Deuteronomy, from the Old Testament.

In the newsletter, Schuh addressed this response to Clarke: "If you are afraid or you have lost your courage and you need two deputies and a sergeant to escort you every time you fly in and out of the airport and patrol deputies to drive by your house when you're out of town you should resign and go home!"

Schuh said Monday that he wrote the column out of frustration over deputies' belief that Clarke too often blames them when things go wrong.

We have to put ourselves in harm's way so that the law abiding people we serve won't have to," Clarke said in a written statement about Schuh's assignment. Deputies might question the use of "we," given Schuh's description of Clarke's personal security.

The deputies union, to no one's surprise, is contesting Clarke's action, claiming it is retaliation.

Clarke will claim it's leadership. But ledership it's not. It's really a cowardly abuse of power, issuing an order and letting others deliver it to Schuh, then refusing to discuss it. Real leadership would be for the sheriff to lead that patrol himself. Maybe, if he realizes how much media attention it would get him, Clarke will patrol the central city on foot himself -- for about 15 minutes, until the cameras leave.



UPDATE: Jay Bullock, AKA Folkbum, offers his take: "Milwaukee's murders, Petty Tyrant Edition."


UPDATE 2: Second day post: "The Clarke caper: Retaliation, pure and simple."

On the whole, he'd rather not be in Milwaukee

Former Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, who has joined the White House fight for Judge John Roberts confirmation to the US Supreme Court. said in the NY Times on Sunday that the fight isn't all that bad. In fact it's not as bad as being in Milwaukee.

"I'm not in the airport in Milwaukee right now, which is nice," Gillespie said in the NYT story.

What that man needs is the full Scott Walker treatment, with free tickets to the Domes, Festa Italiana, and the golf tournament. He'd be begging to come to Milwaukee.

Walker will set his hair

on fire to get a TV camera

Walker: Running for gov, or running a lemonade stand?


Scott Walker, Milwaukee County exec and gov wannabe, is in danger of marginalizing himself in his quest to get his face in front of TV cameras.

His latest stunt was to stand outside the governor's residence when Gov. Jim Doyle was signing the state budget bill on Monday. Walker said he was there to protest Doyle's failure to sign a property tax freeze, although Doyle had just signed one into law.

What Walker was really doing there was trying to get his mug on TV in Madison.

As county exec, he has no trouble getting covered in Milwaukee, the state's biggest market. But he's not well-known in the other markets, and most TV stations are not too interested in covering the governor's race more than a year before the election.

So, Walker was off to Maple Bluff to take up a position outside of the budget signing. I wasn't there, but I would guess it probably worked. He will probably show up in a sound bite here and there.

Of course, if Walker had something to say about the budget, he could have said it in Wauwatosa, where Doyle came Monday afternoon for another budget-related event. But that, of course, would not have gotten Walker on TV in Madison, where he needs the exposure. That's the same reason he rode a motorcycle around the state to talk up Milwaukee (and his campaign), visiting every media market.

Two years ago, when Doyle signed the budget, a group of unhappy Hmong protesters stood outside the residence to support State Sen. Gary George and protest Doyle's veto of a middle-of-the-night George amendment to build a Hmong cultural center, in exchange for George's vote for the budget.

This year, Scott Walker stood out there.

It doesn't seem much like a gubernatorial strategy. Frankly, it seems a little pathetic.

Reynolds is poster boy for bad service

How bad a state senator is Tom Reynolds?

Well, aside from his loony-tunes views and penchant for saying things that make you wince, it turns out he also is very bad at taking care of the basics.

Things like answering his mail, returning phone calls, or responsing to invitations.

Gretchen Schuldt of Story Hill reports:

There was an audible reaction of surprise at a recent neighborhood meeting because someone got an honest-to-gosh response from Reynolds’ office.

The message, in reply to a resident’s e-mail inquiry about Reynolds’ position on a particular issue, said Reynolds has a policy against responding through e-mail to questions about his position on any particular issue. Gee, that was helpful.
No wonder he's a target even though the district skews pretty heavily Republican. Wauwatosa Alderman Jim Sullivan is already running as a Democrat, and State Rep. Tony Staskunas is thinking about it, too, Schuldt says.

Reynolds is the born-again fruitcake with a printing press who embarrassed himself in running for Congress, but found a home in the fringe of the Republican Party and won a primary against a moderate, Peggy Rosenzweig, as part of a purge of reasonable Republicans in the legislature.

Monday, July 25, 2005


From WorkingForChange.com Posted by Picasa Click on cartoon to enlarge

Trying , and failing, to change the subject

PRESIDENT BUSH'S new Supreme Court nominee was a historic first after all: the first to be announced on TV dead center in prime time, smack in the cross hairs of "I Want to Be a Hilton." It was also one of the hastiest court announcements in memory, abruptly sprung a week ahead of the White House's original timetable. The agenda of this rushed showmanship - to change the subject in Washington - could not have been more naked. But the president would have had to nominate Bill Clinton to change this subject.

When a conspiracy is unraveling, and it's every liar and his lawyer for themselves, the story takes on a momentum of its own. When the conspiracy is, at its heart, about the White House's twisting of the intelligence used to sell the American people a war - and its desperate efforts to cover up that flimflam once the W.M.D. cupboard proved bare and the war went south -- the story will not end until the war really is in its "last throes."
Those are the first two paragraphs of a NY Times op ed by Frank Rich that is well worth reading in its entirety. Among other things, Rich suggests that AG Alberto Gonzales' handling of the Wilson-Plame issue has cost him a Supreme Court appointment.

What's up with Sensebrenner's madman act?

Is Rep. F. Jim Sensenbrenner off his meds?

Joel McNally's Capital Times op ed says the House Judiciary chair's behavior has gone from bizarre to bonkers.

(Earlier post on F. Jim.)

The old double standard at work

for Roberts and Lautenschlager

Let me get this straight:

Conservatives say John Roberts was just representing his client and doing his job as solicitor when he made arguments against abortion rights and said Roe v. Wade was not decided properly. That doesn't reflect his personal beliefs, they assure us. He was just being a lawyer and doing his job.

But, they argue, if Atty. Gen. Peg Lautenschlager personally favors civil rights for gays, she can't fairly defend the state of Wisconsin against a lawsuit asking the state to grant benefits to domestic partners of state employees. Worse yet, the Republicans say, she attended a Madison rally in support of gay rights in July.

The Journal Sentinel reports:


Lautenschlager said her appearance at the rally was "absolutely appropriate," and that she is able to separate her personal feelings about an issue from her duties. Suggestions that she can't do that are overly political and restricted to the issue of same-sex marriage, she added.

"What my point of view is on those cases - my personal point of view or political point of view - is often diametrically opposed to the position we take as a department," Lautenschlager said. "That's what lawyers do."
That is exactly what lawyers do, especially government lawyers, who represent the government's interests even when they disagree with it.

For some reason, the GOP can't seem to grasp that concept. When Jim Doyle was AG, they weren't satisfied to have him defend the state on school choice because he opposed choice, so they brought in Kenneth Starr, the special persecutor of Bill Clinton. In the domestic partner case, the legislature wants to use a wingnut evangelical law firm that will do a thorough job of gay-bashing.

But when it comes to Bush's Supreme Court nominee, John Roberts, we are supposed to believe that no position he took as a lawyer reflects his personal beliefs.

They can't have it both ways. Or maybe they can. Let's watch and see.

UPDATE: BUCHER CHIMES IN. Paul Bucher, the Waukesha DA who wants Lautenschlager's job, piles on and says Peg should step aside. Are we to assume that if he were elected AG that Bucher would only defend the state in cases where his personal opinion happened to coincide with the state's position? He may want to rethink where this is all headed before just chiming in to score political points. Bucher column.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Surprise! Lautenschlager does her job and files a strong argument for dismissing the case.

The great cream puff scandal!

Jessica McBride, apparently still trying to justify why taxpayers should send Scott Walker around the state on a Harley to hand out $19,000 worth of free tickets to events and tourist attractions, reveals that -- gasp! -- the news media take other freebies!!! (I've adopted her style, just for fun.)

McBride's amusing post reveals the long list, obtained by an open records request, of media outlets which accepted free cream puffs and clown noses from the Wisconsin State Fair.

She writes:

This is part of my effort to expose the media's mock horror over the promotional freebies Walker had the audacity to hand out to reporters and media organizations. I wondered: Did the State dish them out too? And had the same media organizations wringing their hands in horror taken other freebies? Media organizations should not take freebies. Period. Whether it's a cream puff or, yes, a clown nose. It's a bit shocking how many of them do.

But it's silly for them to pretend to be - horrified! - that Scott Walker would dare to hand out freebies. The fact of the matter is that Walker was participating in a common promotional practice. Now we could debate whether his gubernatorial bid changed the equation. Again, I get that. But it's completely disingenuous for the media to act like freebies are - shock! - unusual.

Nice try, but the issue never was whether the media were being offered or accepting freebies -- except in some media circles, perhaps.

Of course Walker's candidacy for governor "changed the equation." If Kathleen O'Leary, the state fair marketing director, were delivering cream puffs to media outlets across the state and then doing interviews about her campaign for governor -- which is what Walker did -- this would indeed be comparable.

The first issue in Walker's ride -- even before anyone knew about the freebies -- was whether Milwaukee County taxpayers should foot the bill for him to ride around the state and increase his visibility and name recognition in his campaign for governor. Taxpayers paid it all -- his salary and those of the staff who went with him, hotel, meals, you name it.

The second question is whether Walker's giving something of value to a voter (like hundreds of dollars worth of tickets) violates state elections law. So far, no one has addressed that question. And Walker's freebies did not all go to the media, as outlined in a previous post.

Maybe a few of those clown noses should go to the county and state ethics and elections boards, who so far have found nothing wrong, in large part because they haven't bothered to look for themselves and have taken Walker's version of events at face value.

Sunday, July 24, 2005

W cast as idiot son

in Faulkner parody winner


"JACKSON, Miss. - A scathing parody that likens President Bush to the "idiot" in William Faulkner's novel "The Sound and the Fury" has won this year's Faulkner write-alike contest — and touched off a literary spat. . . The story portrays Bush in the role of Benjy, the mentally challenged son — or, as Faulkner himself said, the "idiot" — in his 1929 novel about the wreckage of a Southern family," the AP reports.

Read the winning entry.

Let me make this perfectly clear ...

-- Cartoon by Tom Toles, Washington Post

What did the President know, and when did he know it? NY Times.

Quote, unquote

"I voted for George Bush in November of 2000 because I was promised a President who would bring a new tone and a new ethical standard to Washington.

"So where are we? The President has flip-flopped on his promise to fire anyone at the White House implicated in a leak. We now know from press reports that at least Karl Rove and "Scooter" Libby are implicated in these leaks and may have lied during the investigation.

"Instead of a President concerned first and foremost with protecting this country and the intelligence officers who serve it, we are confronted with a President who is willing to sit by while political operatives savage the reputations of good Americans like Valerie and Joe Wilson. This is wrong and this is shameful.'

-- Former CIA official Larry Johnson, in Democratic radio address. Listen.

'Welcome back, Smart Growth'

Pat Durkin's column in the Green Bay Press Gazette sports section puts the Smart Growth issue into perspective:
All hunters, anglers, trappers and anyone else who cares about the resources, beauty and commerce of rural Wisconsin should feel relieved that Gov. Jim Doyle used his veto powers this week to restore the state’s Smart Growth Program.

Even so, one wonders why this program ever required rescue. As laws go, Smart Growth is one of the few that can be embraced by liberals and conservatives alike to justify their beliefs on how best to maintain rural Wisconsin’s values, culture and economic strength.

The law directs communities to use public forums and meetings to adopt comprehensive long-range plans for land-use and development by 2010. But halfway to that target date, along came the legislature’s increasingly infamous Joint Finance Committee. On a 10-6 vote in May, the JFC killed the program’s modest $2 million in grants to help communities create and adopt the plans.

Whew. Why not just go to the estimated 40 percent of Wisconsin’s communities already taking part in this process and kick their chairs and spit on their copy machines?

Some of us naively believe cooperative long-range planning is the only chance we have to maintain rural Wisconsin’s character and increase its economic strength. We can only marvel at the mental gymnastics required by the program’s opponents to transform Smart Growth into a big brother, anti-realtor, green-powered conspiracy against the little guy.

Let’s not forget that Smart Growth came into being in 1999 when Tommy Thompson occupied the governor’s mansion. No one ever worried that Thompson might stare down a bulldozer or lash himself into the treetops to make a statement against urban sprawl.

I would think a fiscal conservative would look at rural traffic jams and ponder how to get all those SUVs off the farmer’s back so he doesn’t have to wait so long to cross the highway and get back to plowing. Or maybe this tax-pincher should wonder how much school districts could save if they weren’t continually expanding bus routes and stopping each bus every 100 yards to pick up one kid per every 5-acre parcel of subdivided land.

As those thoughts marinate, the free-market philosopher might consider the road itself and ponder the mounting maintenance costs of bridges, gravel, cement, snow-removal and upgraded power lines as commuters replace farmers and cattlemen, and Marts replace tractor-supply dealers.

He should also question those folks who profess love for rural living but never noticed its seamier side until their septic backed up, the wind shifted, or they had to tote their own garbage to the landfill. Didn’t they realize rural living costs more time, money, patience, planning and routine labor?

Smart Growth isn’t just about managing urban sprawl or dictating which house colors won’t clash with scenic vistas. The reality of rural life is that everyone and everything is connected, whether it’s through wildlife, tourism, forestry, agriculture, forestry, housing or commerce. Only by working together to accommodate shared or competing interests can we have any hope of sustainable growth and thriving rural economies.

Most people who grow up in rural Wisconsin know intelligent, profitable land use requires interaction and planning. After all, the silent anarchy of inaction and neglect has never proven itself a good business model.

On sale soon at a gun show near you . . .

THE GRIM REAPER’S ARM JUST GOT LONGER: The M107 Long-Range Sniper Rifle

The long arm of the U.S. Army just got longer. The Army has just approved the M107 sniper rifle -- which will allow all sniper teams to reach out and touch someone from farther away than ever before. -- SoldierTech

Meanwhile, the House Judiciary Committee, including Wisconsin members Green and F. Jim Sensenbrenner rejected an amendment to the Patriot Act to stop the export of US-purchased guns to terrorists.

The full House defeated a similar attempt in June. Earlier post.

Specter's playing for keeps on stem cells

So says Margaret Carlson in an LA Times op ed:

One of her observations:

[Sen. Arlen] Specter, who has been battling Hodgkin's disease since February, is his own draw now. Never weaker physically, never stronger mentally, Specter says he is propelled out of bed each day by his work and by the hundreds of letters he has received from patients determined to see stem cell research expanded. His former chief of staff, David Urban, calls him the Lance Armstrong of the Senate: "If you close your eyes and don't look at his bald head and gaunt cheeks, but just listen to him, you'd think he was a well man at the height of his powers."

UPDATE: Specter threatens an end run, may attach stem cell measure to appropriations bill. Washington Post.

Friday, July 22, 2005

Tommy to get a Satanic chip implanted

This startling news from ZDNet:

Tommy Thompson, the Health and Human Services Secretary in President Bush's first term and a former Governor of Wisconsin, is going to get tagged.

Thompson has joined the board of Applied Digital, which owns VeriChip, the company that specializes in subcutaneous RFID tags for humans and pets. To help promote the concepts behind the technology, Thompson himself will get an RFID tag implanted under his skin.

Human RFID tags have emerged as one of the more controversial technologies in years. Civil libertarians theorize that the chips will allow governments or corporations to track people's movement and behavior. Some Christians have said the chips are so evil they fulfill a biblical prophesy about satanic influences.

Advocates, on the other hand, say the chips will contain personal information that will help medical professionals and others provide emergency treatment. The chip provides a form of identification that's tough to lose. By clicking the number found on the chip into a password-restricted database, paramedics can get an accident victim's medical history in the field. (One of VeriChip's scientists came up with the idea of using the company's pet RFID tags on people after watching rescue workers struggle to find the missing after the Sept. 11 tragedy.)

Prisons and jails are also experimenting with RFID bracelets and continual tracking to reduce inmate violence.

"We are all well aware of the need to enhance Information Technology in ealthcare," Thompson said in a prepared statement. "It is my belief that VeriChip is an important and secure means of accessing medical records and other information. I look forward to working with the company as it continues its growth."

Another bonus: If Tommy strays and ends up at the pound, they'll be able to call his owner and not have to put him up for adoption or put him to sleep.

StemPAC: Help us choose an ad

StemPAC, which was created to support sensible stem cell laws and research, wants your help to choose the web ad you like best.

It's really just another excuse to get you to their website, which is not a bad idea, either.

Enough crooks on the bench?

Random thoughts on Supreme Court race

Random ruminations on the decision of State Supreme Court Justice N. Patrick Crooks to run for another 10-year term, surprising the buzzards that were circling in anticipation of his retirement:

INCUMBENTS RULE. First rule of Supreme Court politics is that incumbents are virtually unbeatable. I have not checked to verify it, but my recollection is that the last incumbent to lose was in the late 1950s or early 1960s, and that he was blamed for a decision that let the Braves leave Milwaukee. That may not be entirely accurate, but it's a good story. The closest challenge I am aware of otherwise was Appeals court Judge Rick Brown's race against Justice Donald Steinmetz in 1990, when Brown got 48%.

CROOKS' BASE UNHAPPY. That said, Crooks has some problems with his conservative base. Charlie Sykes calls Crooks "Wisconsin's own David Souter," and Owen at Boots & Sabers blog says, "We need a good conservative to run against Crooks." (And look at some of the comments on my initial post yesterday.) Crooks' sins are that he was part of two recent 4-3 majorities in opinions that overturned a cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases, and allowed a lawsuit to proceed against lead paint manufacturers even though the victim did not know which company manufactured the paint that cause his injuries. Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce is up in arms, vowing to pass legislation to counteract the court's decisions. Whether the right will actually field a candidate to run at Crooks from the right remains to be seen. If that happens, and a moderate candidate stays in, it could change the dynamic. While the two conservatives slug it out in a primary, a reasonable sounding moderate could build a broad base and steal the victory. (We can only hope.)

THE COLLEGIAL COURT. Crooks' anti-climatic official announcement today, all of two sentences long, included this quote: “I have appreciated my nine years on the Supreme Court, serving with bright, hard-working colleagues, and I hope that the citizens of Wisconsin will give me the opportunity to continue as a Supreme Court Justice.” He didn't appreciate his colleagues quite as much in 1999, when Crooks recruited Sharren Rose to run against Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson. Abrahamson won 60-40, but her friends and supporters, who are legion, have not forgotten.

WHAT CHANGED CROOKS' MIND? At age 67, he seemed ready to leave the bench, but is telling people that the working atmosphere on the court really has improved since the years when there was almost open warfare, fueled by personality conflicts among the justices. Crooks says he is enjoying himself more, and technology has freed justices from being tied to Madison. Many of them work from home or even from out-of-state, and he intends to do more long-distance work.

IS THIS A 10-YEAR COMMITMENT? Does Crooks really want to serve until he is 77, or is he planning to keep the job until the day a Republican takes over the governor's office and could appoint his replacement?

WHERE ARE THE TRIAL LAWYERS? The trial bar's members have sometimes been major players in court races, but usually only when there is someone they see as a real enemy, like Steinmetz. Crooks' votes on the two recent cases may make them less likely to work hard to defeat him or write big checks to a Crooks opponent. But it seems unlikely they will actively support Crooks, and if they do, the conservatives will use it against him. Another question is whether Crooks' decision has cleared the field. The candidate farthest into the race is Linda Clifford, a Madison lawyer who has filed a committee and started raising money, without waiting for an official announcement from Crooks. She did not expect him to run, but knew he might, and is weighing whether to run anyway. Her husband, Keith Clifford, is a past president of the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers.

GOOD NEWS FOR JENSEN? Rep. Scooter Jensen (R-Still Not Convicted) would probably like to see Crooks sitting there if and when his case comes before the Supreme Court. Jensen, indicted on felony charges of misconduct in public office, raCrooks''s 1995 and 1996 campaigns,was paid $26,000 for the work, and contributed $1,600 to Crooks. But when a motion on the caucus scandal case involving Jensen and other legislators came to the court, Crooks didn't see any reason to recuse himself.

MESSAGE: I've always thought someone should run a campaign against him with the theme: "No more crooks on the bench. We have enough." Or "Get crooks off the supreme court" or "Do you want crooks on our supreme court?" Or something like that. Feel free to use them; no charge.

Paper outs David Clarke as a Republican

He won't say he is one, but David Clarke walks like a Republican, talks like a Republican, quacks like a Republican, and hangs out with Republicans.

You can't blame the Journal Sentinel for concluding that Clarke must be a Republican duck, as it did in a story today.

Clarke gives nominee thumbs up
Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. on Thursday urged Wisconsin Sens. Herb Kohl and Russ Feingold to support John G. Roberts Jr., President Bush's nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"As a 28-year veteran of law enforcement and sheriff of Milwaukee County, I have a keen interest in who may get placed on the Supreme Court," Clarke said in a telephone interview. "I favor a nominee who is going to be a strict constructionist of the Constitution, who is going to apply the Constitution in the way the Founding Fathers laid it out, not like a living, breathing document that moves."

Earlier, Clarke joined other state Republicans at a news conference in front of the federal courthouse to urge Kohl and Feingold, both Democrats and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to give a fair hearing to Roberts, who now serves as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Rove, Libby stories don't square with reporters'

Bloomberg reports:

Two top White House aides have given accounts to a special prosecutor about how reporters first told them the identity of a CIA agent that are at odds with what the reporters have said, according to people familiar with the case.


Hmmmm. Would perjury be grounds for dismissal?

"Karl Rove, without the baggage"

Pinch me, I'm dreaming. Aren't I?

A proposed new reality show, looking for the next James Carville or Karl Rove, would match upcoming political consultants, left and right, and the competition would include having them run negative campaigns against each other, the Washington Post reports.

The winner gets to spend $1-million on a candidate or cause in 2006.

"We're trying to find Karl Rove, without all the baggage," said series co-creator Ken Smukler.

Well, look no farther. He's right here in Milwaukee, and his name is Jim Villa.

When Scott Walker announced that Villa, his political consultant, was moving into the county exec's office to be his chief of staff, consultant T. Bob Murphy offered this assessment to the Journal Sentinel:

"He's sort of like the Karl Rove of Milwaukee, without the baggage."

Questions: Do you think that description has already entered the realm of cliche?

Will Villa compete on the reality show? Walker could certainly use the money.

Not a merit pay raise

State lawmakers give themselves 4% pay raises, but withhold increases for top UW System officials to get the UW's attention and let the university know they'e unhappy about a few things. Story.

As the Journal Sentinel says in an editorial today, the legislative salary hike was certainly not a merit raise. If it were based on performance, they'd be giving money back.

David Clarke's opus: "Middle Class Like Me"

Milwaukee County David Clarke is on a tear against blacks again -- well, he would say against violence in the inner city. But if you read his screed, sent to Charlie Sykes as usual, you might wonder what his point is.

Clarke and his admirers portray him as a conservative intellectual. Maybe he's just too smart for me. Read this, posted on Sykes Writes, and note my highlights:

This violence has nothing to do with racism, poverty, lack of jobs etc. There is another issue relating to this violence that people are ignoring. Another major cause is middle class flight. Ever since the eighties a steady stream of strong, intact middle class families is leaving the city. What remains then is the underclass and those who can't afford to leave. Middle class families create stability in communities and keep things like crime and violence in check.

Milwaukee's central city is spreading out and is in the midst of urban decay. This is something that is not easily reversed or even halted. This is something that blacks themselves are going to have to solve. Government and the do-gooder liberals are powerless to solve this.

What government should do is enact policies that strengthen families and fix K-12 ed. That's all they can and should do. I would imagine that some lib will call for the creation of yet another social service program costing millions of dollars-an anger management program. It's laughable.

So this has nothing to do with poverty. It just has to do with all of the families who are not in poverty moving away, leaving those in poverty behind. Am I missing something, or does that sound like it has something to do with poverty?

Clarke just can't understand what's wrong with these poor blacks. Why didn't they grow up in a middle class family like he did, with parents who would send them to private schools, like his parents did? Sheriff Clarke, needless to say, does not live in the inner city. He was lucky. He didn't have to try to pull himself out of poverty. (If Clarke ever got around to publishing his ideas in book form, it wouldn't be titled, "Black Like Me." Maybe "Middle Class Like Me.")

Who wants to be around all of those poor people? Certainly not Sheriff Clarke. Besides the violence, they don't dress nicely, either.

What on earth do you think David Clarke is talking about?

Premature withdrawal? Say again?

As Emily Litella, the Gilda Radner character, might say: What's all this I hear about premature ejaculation by our troops?

Mark Green, speak up! I know this war stuff can be exciting and stimulating, and that you've actually penetrated Iraq airspace yourself to see firsthand what kind of activity is going on there.

But premature ejaculation? I get e-mails every day about how to fix that. It shouldn't be a big problem for the Pentagon to get some quantity of that stuff for the troops to rub on their vital parts.

Oh, not premature ejaculation? Premature WITHDRAWAL? Like pulling out when you haven't gotten your rocks off yet?

Never mind.

Churches join debate on Great Lakes stewardship

The Wisconsin Council of Churches' policy director says Christians have no excuse for not caring about a proposed new Great Lakes compact that could allow some water to leave the lakes. In a Capital Times op ed, Peter Bakken says:

"As God's stewards we should push for water conservation measures and the protection of the entire Great Lakes watershed, and we should help restore the quality of the Great Lakes basin."
Even a heathen like me can say "Amen" to that sentiment.

Thursday, July 21, 2005

Folkbum is blog of the week

With a boost from my non-endorsement, Folkbum won Blog of the Week honors on mkeonline.

We will face off in a later round. Let the mudslinging begin.

No 'Vanna White' veto

Rep. Scooter Jensen (still not convicted) gave the Journal Sentinel a big front page scoop for Thursday's paper:

Gov. Jim Doyle was going to use a "Vanna White veto" to reduce an appropriation for the Zoo Interchange freeway project from $38-million to $3-million.

The newspaper even ran a graphic to show how Doyle would cross out the "8" and make the number 3 instead of 38.

Only problem is, Jensen and the JS (which apparently took him at his word) got it almost all wrong.

Doyle will reduce the amount from $38-million to $3-million.

But the "Vanna White veto" is a fig newton of Jensen's imagination.

There is no $38-million number in the budget for Doyle to turn into a 3. In fact, the Zoo interchange is not even mentioned or listed in the state budget document as a separate item. Doyle will reduce that appropriation, but not the way Jensen and the JS described it.

Even if Doyle were going to do that, it would not be a "Vanna White veto." That term was coined in a State Supreme Court case disputing how much power a governor had to veto parts of words and use the letters to form new words. It has nothing to do with crossing out numbers. If you've ever watched "Wheel of Fortune," you'd know that Vanna never, ever plays with numbers.

So, except for that, the paper had it right. In the future, when budget expert Jensen offers a scoop, they might want to consult a second source.

Justice Crooks to seek re-election

State Supreme Court Justice Patrick Crooks, who had been expected to retire next year, will announce Friday that he will run for another 10-year term on the court, the Xoff Files has learned.

Crooks was calling attorneys Thursday to tell them he had decided to run again.

A number of attorneys and judges across the state were considering entering the race for Crooks' seat. One of them, Madison attorney Linda Clifford, told WisPolitics yesterday she might run even if Crooks got into the race. She is the only active candidate who had filed a campaign committee and reported $203,000 in the bank, of which about $140,000 was her personal contribution.

Mark Frankel, a former Dane County circuit judge, had been actively lining up support and endorsements from prosecutors, judges, labor groups, and lawyers, but had not taken any formal steps yet and probably will opt out of the race. He and others may focus now on the 2007 race, when Justice Jon Wilcox is expected to retire.

Others who were looking at the race, assuming Crooks was out, included Circuit Judges Michael Brennan of Milwaukee, Annette Ziegler of Washington County, and Donald Zeidmulder of Brown County.

Crooks, 67, of Green Bay, is a conservative who had been a Brown County circuit judge for 20 years before being elected to the Supreme Court in 1996, winning a seven-candidate primary and defeating Appeals Court Judge Ralph Adam Fine in the general election.

The primary for Crooks' seat is in February if there are more than two candidates, with the general election in April.

UPDATE: Followup post: "Enough Crooks on the bench?"

Quote, unquote

"He's good in every way, except he's not a woman." -- Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the man nominated to replace her, John Roberts.

No rest for Rove

The Supreme Court nomination stole the show for a day, but the Plame case is back on the top of page one in today's Washington Post. DailyKos comments.

Is it a walking quorum? Depends on

which side of the county line you're on

Here are the facts of the case, as best I can explain them. (I am not a lawyer, in case there was any doubt about that.)

School board members, facing a tough decision, e-mailed each other about the issue. The whole board wasn't always included on the e-mails, but a majority participated at one time or another. Board members also discussed the issue outside of meetings.

A citizen filed a complaint, claiming the board had violated the state open meetings law.

The outcome? Well, it depends on where you live.

If you live in Milwaukee County, you've broken the law. If you live in Waukesha County, you haven't.

No, the cases involving the Wauwatosa and Waukesha School Boards are not identical. But they are close enough to invite a comparison of the outcomes, which were like night and day -- or guilty and not guilty, if you prefer.

Waukesha: No problem

In Waukesha, DA Paul Bucher said e-mails sent back and forth to various school board members and school district administrators in the days before an April 5 referendum didn't constitute a walking quorum.

"The e-mails didn't raise substantive issues that dealt with school board business," Bucher said. "This wasn't an open meetings issue."

Not school board business? The board members were discussing how to respond to a mailing from an anti-referendum group in order to try to win passage of the referendum.

Bucher's position, the Waukesha Freeman said,in a July 12 editorial:
" is the opposite of what is stated in a compliance guide for governmental bodies that is published by the Wisconsin Department of Justice Web site. The guide states that a quorum is created if a majority of board members receive the e-mails. That clearly was the case in what occurred with the school district. . .

"It certainly appears that the law has been broken. But if the enforcement side is unwilling to recognize that, then those who broke the law are not only not prosecuted but will likely feel such conduct is appropriate and legal in the future."
Bucher's defenders, including his wife, blogger Jessica McBride, point to AG Peg Lautenschlager's 'refusal to review the decision as evidence that Bucher was right. But actually, the story McBride/Bucher refers to says the AG didn't take it because of a conflict of interest; her office had advised the referendum opponents on the legality of their mailing.

Wauwatosa: Big problem

Now the Wauwatosa case, which had quite a different outcome, as the Journal Sentinel reports.

There, the citizen complaint went to the county corporation counsel, who found five board members had violated the law, engaging in a "walking quorum" by discussing a school closing issue by e-mail, home visits and other conversations.

County attorney Robert E. Andrews says he doesn't think the board broke the law on purpose, but the law doesn't require the showing of intent to break the law or that all members of the quorum be present at one time.

"It is only required that there be a series of gatherings whose participants agree to act in a sufficient number to determine the course of the board," the decision states.

As a remedy, the School Board must:

• Admit it violated the open meetings law by engaging in a walking quorum prior to the January meeting to discuss the closing of Wilson school.

• Get training on the open meetings law.

• Reimburse the citizen who complained $400 he paid for copies of e-mail correspondence among various School Board members.

So there you have it. Two school boards, two counties, two complaints, two different but similar sets of facts. And two totally different outcomes.

I'm sure the Bucher defenders will weigh in and nitpick this analysis. Some have said he should get credit for not caving in to the Citizens for Responsible Government anti-tax group, which filed the complaint, and siding with the Waukesha School Board. But this should be a legal, not a political question. And it seems like the law should be the same on both sides of the county line.

FOOTNOTE: If the term "walking quorum" sounds familiar, it is because I brought it up during the state budget process, when members of the Republican majority on Joint Finance were shuttling in and out of the room to hammer out agreement on budget items in secret. Here's the relevant post,"Walking quorums break the law."

So who's going to file that complaint against Joint Finance?

UPDATE: BUCHER RESPONDS. In a posting on his campaign blog, Bucher writes to the Waukesha Freeman to explain why the newspaper's editorial is "goofy" and he is right. Seems funny he waited more than a week.

Becoming a Republican for fun and profit

Having been treated awhile back to a column by Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke on "How One Becomes a Republican," (Earlier post) I thought I'd share with you another look at the same question.

This one is tongue-in-cheeck, from Jeff Gillenkirk, a former Mario Cuomo speechwriter. It first appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle. It's titled, "Why I'm joining the GOP: Leaving the left for fun and profit."

A sample:

"The reasons are many, not the least of which is age. I turned 55 recently and, having lived more than half my life, I can't afford to worry anymore about the other guy. It's time for me."

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

MMAC's narrow vision on education

Among the many interest groups lobbying Gov. Jim Doyle on budget vetoes is the Metropolitan Milwaukee Assn. of Commerce.

MMAC sent Doyle a letter on "education-related items" in the budget, including choice and charter school issues.

It's a long letter, signed by MMAC President Tim Sheehy, Board Chairman Dennis Kuester, and Robert O'Toole, chairman and CEO of A.O. Smith.

Hard to imagine, but nowhere in the letter about "education-related items" in Milwaukee does it mention that the Republican-controlled legislature slashed public school funding so drastically that Milwaukee Public Schools will lose $40-million in state aid.

Doyle may find a way to fix that, at least in part, with a line item budget veto. But MMAC didn't even ask. Public schools are not even on their radar.

No comment

-- Don Wright, Palm Beach Post, via Cagle. (Click on cartoon to enlarge.)


Charlie Sykes, self-proclaimed defender of liberty as he defines it, asks, "Why stop at cell phones? Why not ban kids?"

How about if we start by banning kids driving with cell phones?

The Court nominee: What Laura knew

So much for the suggestions last week that when Laura Bush said she hoped her husband would appoint a woman to the court that she was actually reflecting his plans, not expressing her own views. Reprinting someone's predictions and insights after the fact is a little cruel, but also fun, so here goes:

From Elizabeth Bumiller's White House Letter in the Washington Post last week:

When Laura Bush said in a television interview last week that she hoped her husband would name a woman to replace the retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court, a lot of people saw it as a top item on the first lady's "honey do" list. But Republicans close to the White House said that people had it reversed. Laura Bush, they said, was not so much nudging her husband as reflecting his thinking.

The current consensus among Republicans with close access to the White House is that President George W. Bush is interested in picking a conservative woman for the court. Laura Bush's words, they said, were the most powerful evidence so far.

"It says that they're looking very carefully at a woman," said a Republican with longtime ties to the White House. "I don't think she would have said it without knowing something."
Well, she did know something. She knew she hoped her husband would appoint a woman. Like a lot of other people, she is disappointed today.

UPDATE: A NEW STANDARD. The NY Times actually says this:

"By suggesting that Mr. Bush was giving serious consideration to a woman or minority even if he did not choose one in the end, the White House may have minimized any political repercussions Mr. Bush may have suffered by choosing a man to replace the court's first woman."

That's the new Affirmative Action -- considering a woman or minority group member for a job before you give it to a white male. Even Clarence Thomas could live with that.

Lautenschlager's numbers tell grim story

The latest bad news for Atty. Gen. Peg Lautenschlager is that "time apparently doesn't heal all wounds," as Spivak and Bice put it in their report on a recent poll.

Lautenschlager's numbers are in the toilet.

The good news, of sorts, is that her name recognition is high. The bad news is that people may know who she is, but they are not ready to say they'll vote for her for reelection next year. In fact, they pretty much say they won't.

A dismal 12% of respondents said they definitely plan to vote for her. Another 15% said they probably would. That's 27% -- a long ways from 50.

Worse yet, 23% said they definitely will vote for someone else, and another 21% said they probably will vote for someone else.

Do the math: 27% to reelect, 44% against. And another 19% who say it depends on the person. Many of those, presumably, are Democrats who hope they will have another choice. They might vote for someone else in a primary, but probably would vote for Lautenschlager against one of the Republicans who want her job.

Her effective name recognition -- those who know enough about her to have an opinion about her -- is 78%. They split evenly, 32-32 on favorable-unfavorable ratings, but the "very unfavorable" number is almost twice as high as the "very favorable" (18-10).

A rule of thumb used to be that an incumbent with a reelect number less than 50% was vulnerable. But these days, a number in the 40s is considered OK. Lautenschlager's 27 doesn't even approach being OK. It's a campaign on life support. From all reports, she is in denial and insists that she will run and win reelection. But if she faces the facts, she will pull the plug, serve out her term and leave office with dignity, rather than go out a loser.

The second shoe everyone is waiting for is her finance report, but that is almost irrelevant. No amount of money is going to repair the self-inflicted damage she has suffered. It's time to move on.

UPDATE: Lautenschlager reports $140,000 in the bank. She says this is the best fundraising period she'd ever had, but she's never been much of a fundraiser. Republicans Bucher and Van Hollen each have about half of what she does, but neither has been at it very long.

Who are the best Republicans?

Conservative blogger Dennis York tests the premise that there must be at least a few decent Democrats, and has produced a list of five he rates highest in Wisconsin. York's list.

He has challenged me to do the same for Republicans. Who are the best Republicans in terms of being willing to listen, work together for a common good, and practice civility in the midst of the partisan wars? Current officeholders only, please.

Your nominations and comments would be most helpful. Don't leave them as comments, though. Please e-mail to Xofffiles@gmail.com, or use the e-mail link on the home page of the Xoff Files.

And include some explanation or rationale for your choice(s). Thanks.

Quote, unquote

"The Senate's stem-cell debate forces a moment of truth upon Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.): Is he, at bottom, a doctor and scientist dedicated to saving lives, or just an ambitious politician out to advance his career? At the moment, the evidence suggests the latter — that he's working to peel votes away from legislation that would hasten stem-cell research, and in the process give himself and his party political cover." -- Morton Kondracki in Roll Call.

Ethics, elections boards were never asked

the right question about Walker ride

OK, I'm sure you're tired of the hoopla about whether it is ethical for Scott Walker to give $19,000 worth of free tickets to the news media, or whether there is an ethics problem with the media accepting them. I say both.

But let's set that aside for now. (This is long, but stick with me.)

Let's talk for a minute about the freebies that Walker, a candidate for governor, gave to people who were not in the news media, during his now-famous Harley tour of Wisconsin media markets last month.

Walker's main defense has been that the whole trip was to promote Milwaukee tourism, not his campaign for governor, and that he was giving free tickets to the news media to help bring tourists to Milwaukee County. He also pointed out more than once that the county and state ethics boards and state election board had told him it was OK.

The ethics and elections boards signed off on the premise that the tickets were going to the media. But what about the non-media tickets? Who got them? Was that OK, too?

Let's start with who got free tickets, from documents released in an open records request:

Kutter Harley-Davidson, Janesville -- 8 NASCAR, 4 Summerfest, 6 State Fair, 2 US Bank golf championship.

Kegel's Harley-Davidson, Rockford -- 6 Art Museum, 4 Mexican Fiesta, 12 NASCAR, 5
Children's museum, 6 State Fair, 2 Irish Fest, 10 Indian Summer, 2 Pettit Ice Center.

Kathy Kopp, executive director, Platteville Chamber of Commerce -- 10 Indian Summer, 4 Pettit Ice Center, 4 Art Museum, 4 Zoo, 5 Children's Museum.

George Krueger, Platteville Area Industrial Development Corp. -- 4 NASCAR, 2 State Fair.

St. Paul Harley-Davidson -- 10 Indian Summer, 2 US Bank golf, 8 Parks, 5 Children's Museum, 4 NASCAR, 2 Mexican Fiesta.

GM Tomahawk Plant -- 4 NASCAR, 2 Summerfest, 2 US Bank golf, 2 Indian Summer.


OK, those are not media outlets, agreed? Some are listed as businesses. But people -- owners or employees, probably -- not businesses, ended up with the tickets.

Did any agency ever tell Walker it was OK to give freebies to people (if they live in Wisconsin, the term would be voters)?

Well, no, because he didn't ask them that question.

Walker's June 21, 2004 letter from the county Ethics Board Chairman John C. Carter, which seemed to give clearance for the ride, was based entirely on what Walker told Carter about the event. "You have determined this tour to be county business," Carter wrote before giving it a green light. There was no mention of any ticket giveaways in Carter's letter.

This year, when Summerfest Board Chair Howard Schnoll wrote Walker to make sure the ride had a clean bill of health, Walker replied, in a May 17, 2005 letter, that "the ... facts are very similar to those of last year's Ride, wherein the Ethics Board determined no violation would occur, and therefore the Ethics Board has no current plans to submit this matter to the full board for an opinion."

Walker's letter to Schnoll does not mention ticket giveaways, either.

Rather, like the 2004 letter to Carter, it focuses on whether it is OK for Walker and other county employees to get reduced hotel room rates.

When the Green Bay Press Gazette blew the whistle on the giveaways, it asked state regulators whether the ride or giveaway broke any rules or laws. The paper reported:

Kevin Kennedy, executive director of the state Elections Board, said his office regulates such matters only in terms of how campaign funds are spent.

“From our standpoint, what we regulate is where the money is being used for political activities,” said Kennedy. “But, if his purpose is to promote Milwaukee — and in this case it clearly is — then that really becomes an issue for the taxpayers and the ethics board in Milwaukee.”


Representatives of the Milwaukee County Ethics Board did not return phone calls. But a Milwaukee County Elections Commission assistant said the county ethics guidelines are identical to the state’s rules governing campaigns. [The state ethics board says it doesn't regulate campaigns.--Xoff.]

R. Roth Judd, executive director of the state Ethics Board, said the incident involving Walker is a campaign issue and not an ethical one. “Certainly the ethics code doesn’t address this,” he said.

So the ethics and elections boards pass it around like a hot potato. But the issue was not as clear-cut as the Elections Board's Kennedy described it, "clearly to promote Milwaukee."

The real issue is whether it is permissible for a candidate for governor to give something of value -- perhaps worth hundreds of dollars -- to a prospective voter. Not a media outlet, a voter.

No one has asked Kennedy that question yet. But maybe someone should. I am pretty sure, from past experience, that I know the answer to that one. Let's see if Kennedy agrees.

Tuesday, July 19, 2005

Columbus gun ban worse

than Columbine to NRA

This from the Violence Policy Center, after the NRA canceled its national convention in Columbus, Ohio because the city passed an assault wepaons ban:

"Today's announcement confirms that to the National Rifle Association, the Columbus, Ohio, assault weapons ban is a far greater tragedy than the Columbine assault weapons massacre. For those who had any doubt, it is clear that for the NRA, guns are more important than children, and an assault weapons ban is a greater tragedy than an assault weapons massacre. In 1999, following the Columbine assault weapons massacre, which left 15 dead and 23 wounded, Denver, Colorado, leaders asked the NRA not to hold their annual meeting scheduled for Denver out of respect for the victims and the trauma that engulfed the city and state following the shooting. The NRA's response was to ignore these pleas. Now, when Columbus, Ohio, votes to ban the very guns used in the Columbine massacre, the NRA acts almost immediately to move its meeting."
Earlier post.

A non-endorsement for Folkbum

Folkbum, one of my leftie blogging compatriots whose secret identity is Jay Bullock, a teacher, has been nominated for Blog of the Week by MKEOnline. The Xoff Files still hasn't decided what to do with the million dollar check that comes with the prize, since winning the contest a couple of weeks ago.

I don't know Jay/Folkbum except on the Internet. But his blog is worth a read and gets my vote.

Bill Proxmire used to claim he never endorsed any candidates in Democratic primaries. He just announced who he was voting for. So there you have it.

I think if Folkbum wins we might eventually have to compete, so I will save any negative campaigning until then. Good luck, Mr. Bum.

Doyle gets it right on first vetoes

Gov. Jim Doyle scored a trifecta Monday with his first budget vetoes, all on environmental issues.

*** He won praise from many of the environmentalists and lefty leggies who have been critical of him. For example, The Sierra Club, which has been unhappy with Doyle, said in its release:

"On behalf of over 14,400 members throughout the state, the Sierra Club – John Muir Chapter thanks Governor Jim Doyle for being the backstop to protect Wisconsin’s air, land and water resources. The stroke of the Governor’s pen has helped restore Wisconsin’s reputation as a tourist destination with desirable communities for residents. We want Illinois and Minnesota to send us their tourists, not their trash.

"The Governor revived three visionary Wisconsin laws. Together the Stewardship Fund, Smart Growth and the Recycling Law protect our beaches, rivers, forests and natural areas for the enjoyment of this and future generations. They enable local residents to build desirable, livable communities. These laws support a land ethic that conserves natural resources whether they are rare plants, productive farmland, safe drinking water or recoverable materials from our waste stream."
*** He restored programs -- the Stewardship Fund, Smart Growth, and recycling -- that resonate with the public, scoring some political points.

*** And he apparently did it without the Republicans even putting up a fight. They say they will not try to override those vetoes, but will tackle some of them as separate bills -- subject, of course, to another Doyle veto. That tells you two things: (1) they knew an override attempt would fail, and (2) The public thinks Doyle is on the right side of those issues.

There will be other contentious issues as the vetoes unfold, but starting with three green issues was a master stroke.

JS story.

Bush raises the bar on Rove

As predicted, W has changed the rules of the game to protect Karl Rove, W's brain, from being exiled from the administration.

Now Bush says he'll fire anyone who has committed a crime. He had said before he would fire anyone who was involved in leaking the names of a covert CIA agent.

Rove may not technically be guilty of a crime. But he certainly is guilty of leaking the name and damaging national security. For anyone else, that would have been grounds for dismissal long ago. WashPost story.

Quote, unquote

"I tell them they have to run like they are a candidate for sheriff."

-- Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley's advice to presidential candidates about how to campaign in Iowa.

Walker gets it backwards, moves political

operative in county executive's office

So Jim Villa, former Scott Walker chief of staff who left to start a political consulting business with Walker as a main client, is coming back to be Walker's chief of staff.

As someone who has put together a lot of campaigns and helped move personnel, including myself, back and forth from government to politics, I am baffled.

Two political types the Journal Sentinel asked, T. Bob Murphy and Jeff Fleming, gushed about what a great idea it was and how wonderful Villa is -- "Karl Rove without the baggage," said Murphy, who must be looking for some business.

Without the baggage? We'll get back to that in a minute.

But first the big picture. In most campaigns, when it gets to be campaign time and things heat up, an officeholder moves his top aide out of government and into the campaign. That's what Walker did with his re-election campaign for exec last year; Villa left the exec's office and ran the race.

It's what Jim Doyle did when Susan Goodwin moved from the AG's office to his gov campaign almost two years before the election. He did the same thing with Andy Cohn in his AG races. Tommy Thompson did it with Scooter Jensen. I could go on, but you get the idea. The time to move someone from a campaign job to a government job is after you win the election, not when you're running. When you're running they move in the other direction, from government to the campaign.

One reason to do that is for a candidate to put the person he/she trusts and relies on the most in charge of the campaign, which, frankly, is more important to the officeholder at that point than whatever government job the candidate currently holds.

The other is to get rid of all of those questions about whether the campaign is being run out of the candidate's government office. Putting Villa there now will guarantee that those questions are asked every day. He will be working under the microscope.

Now, back to the "no baggage" claim.

Let's start with this, from the Journal Sentinel story:

In an Aug. 25, 2004, interview, Walker acknowledged Villa's role as a conduit between Walker's office and political operatives setting up a Chicago campaign fund-raiser for him in January 2003, when Villa was in his first stint in county government as chief of staff. County e-mail records reviewed by the Journal Sentinel showed numerous contacts between Villa and P. Nicholas Hurtgen, a former Chicago investment broker who helped set up Walker's Windy City fund-raiser on Jan. 31, 2003.

In the 2004 interview, Walker said he hadn't been aware of Villa's apparent campaign work from the courthouse, which he said was "inappropriate." However, Walker said it appeared to have been only "a couple of times" that Villa replied to campaign-related e-mail from his courthouse computer instead of referring the writer to a campaign e-mail account.

Hurtgen, who was seeking county municipal bond business at the time of the Walker fund-raiser, is now under federal indictment on allegations of extortion and mail and wire fraud in connection with a hospital construction project in Illinois.

Villa last year said his e-mail exchanges with Hurtgen and others on the fund-raiser "may have been an inadvertent mistake" and were "a fairly isolated" accident. He wrote that in an Aug. 25, 2004, e-mail response to a reporter's question.

"Generally speaking I insisted that people contact me at home if they wanted to discuss politics," Villa wrote. "I had enough official business on my plate to keep me busy during the day."

No baggage? Just working on the taxpayer's dime to organize a fundraiser with a guy who is now an indicted felon?

Just last week, I revealed that Villa, while a political consultant working for Walker, had advanced and organized the controversial Walker Harley ride, paid for by taxpayers, in 2004.

If Walker thinks that having Villa in his office, making those arrangements, would have made the trip non-political, we are in for a very fun year.

One thing this does say: Walker is feeling the heat, feeling things are out of control, and reeling from the ongoing negative media coverage he's gotten from this year's Harley ride. By the way, Villa helped plan the 2005 ride, too, meeting in the county exec's office on Nov. 29 with Walker and others to discuss the route and plans, according to a document released as part of an open records request. More to come.

One more thing: I doubted it could be true, but Jessica McBride had the scoop on this move yesterday, Jessica syndrome notwithstanding.

Both sides want GardPants to butt out


SpongeJohn GardPants

When we last left our hero, Speaker SpongeJohn GardPants, he was enlisting the aid of an evangelical law firm to make sure that no gay people who work for the state of Wisconsin got any health care benefits for their partners.

People just have no appreciation of the lengths he's willing to go to be of service. GardPants got this firm, which was very busy making sure our kids weren't corrupted by gay cartoons, and organizing school events to show sympathy for those infected by the gay lifestyle, to help discriminate against Wisconsin gays for free. Earlier post on the Alliance Defense Fund.

Now, both sides in the lawsuit over domestic partner benefits have filed briefs (naughty word; surprised the Alliance files them) saying the legislature has no standing to intervene in the case, the Wisconsin State Journal reports.

UPDATE: SPONGEPAUL BUCHERPANTS PILES ON. Always room for one more Republican to join in when we're beating up on gays. AG wannabe Paul Bucher jumps in with a twofer, getting his anti-gay message out while attacking Peg Lautenschlager.Release.
Posted by Picasa

NRA punishes Columbus

for protecting its citizens

We posted a Gun Guys item the other day speculating about what kind of bombshell announcement NRA President Wayne LaPierre could have planned for Columbus, Ohio.

Well, the suspense is over. The NRA has canceled its plans to hold a national convention in Columbus because the city has passed a ban on assault weapons.

The mayor says the city stands by the ban, despite the loss of a convention that would have brought estimated $15 to $20 million to the city.

Mayor Michael Coleman says, "We won't be sold. We're not for sale and they won't hold us hostage."

Near as I can tell, a lot of LaPierre's members wanted to bring assault weapons to the convention, just to give their arguments a little more weight when they're debating resolutions on the floor, or maybe later when the debate continues at the bar.

This all seems like another good reason to pass a national assault weapons ban. The NRA would have to leave the country.

Story.

Monday, July 18, 2005

Time to weigh in on the Patriot Act

This week, Congress will probabbly vote on bills to reauthorize the expiring parts of the Patriot Act with almost no significant changes and with amendments to make almost all of the provisions permanent. There are four different bills, and all fall far short of what is needed to bring the Patriot Act's far- reaching and intrusive powers back in line with the Constitution:

The worst is a bill passed by the Senate Intelligence Committee that would expand the Patriot Act to allow the FBI to write its own search orders that businesses would be compelled to comply with for literally "any tangible thing."

The FBI would not have to show any specific facts connecting the records sought --medical records, employment records, gun purchase records, tax records, credit reports, insurance records, bank statements, and records from car dealerships, etc. --to an agent of a foreign power or foreign terrorist. They would not even have to get court approval to issue one of these subpoenas. And the recipient of one of these subpoenas is gagged forever from telling anyone about it.

That bill would also allow the FBI to order the postal service to allow law enforcement to track people's mail. This bill is currently awaiting action on the Senate floor. The Republicans don't really expect it to pass. It is designed to make the others look better in comparison.

But the other pending bills aren't really that much better. One is in the Senate Judicary Committee, and two others have cleared House committees -- Judiciary and Intelligence -- and are awaiting House action. They make almost no changes in the law, and make the law permanent, eliminating the sunset provision that requires review and re-authorization.

If these pass, living with these restrictions on our freedom will become a permanent way of life.

Now is the time to contact your representatives in Congress. The message:

SLOW DOWN!!!

* This is a critical moment in the effort to repair the Patriot Act to make sure that its powerful federal power and our limited anti- terrorism resources are focused on foreign terrorists and not ordinary Americans.

* There is no need to rush-- the sunsets do not expire until December.

* Members of Congress haven't had enough time to fully discuss or review these bills.

Most members of the Wisconsin delegation are quite predictable and already know how they will vote.

We are told that Rep. Tom Petri, the most reasonable Republican in the Wisconsin delegation, may be willing to listen.

DC telephone: 202/225-2476
Oshkosh telephone: 920/231-6333
Fond du Lac telephone: 920/922-1180
Toll-free in Wisconsin: 800/242-4883

For contact info on other Wisconsin members, go to Congress.org

IF YOU THINK THE FBI WON'T USE THOSE POWERS ... read today's NY Times story on the files they've already amassed on activist groups.

How dumb does Scooter think we are?

Rep. Scooter Jensen, the accused (but not yet convicted) felon, complains about Gov. Jim Doyle's veto today of a Jensen-engineered budget plan to gut the Stewardship Fund, which buys and protects open space, recreation land, and wildlife habitat.

"Today, Governor Doyle vetoed the largest stewardship purchase in state history – 77,755 acres of land in 34 Wisconsin counties. An opportunity to protect environmentally sensitive lands for the enjoyment of future generations has been lost thanks to Governor Doyle’s short-sighted decision," Jensen said.

One small thing Scooter forgot to mention: The state already owns the 77,755 acres. It would be buying the land from itself, taking the money out of one pocket and putting it into another. It would take the whole budget of the Stewardship Fund, so the program would be unable to save any other lands threatened by development during the next two years. If that happened, Jensen's statement would be right on: "An opportunity to protect environmentally sensitive lands for the enjoyment of future generations" would be lost.

The land Scooter wanted the state to buy is currently owned by the state's Board of Commissioners of Public Lands, and hardly in danger.

If you want to know more about the fast one Scooter tried to pull, here is an earlier post, "Scooter puts the screws to Stewardship."

Long odds for Mark Green

From Roll Call's Louis Jacobson, via ABC News' Note:

At least eight House Members are expected to seek their state's governorship this cycle, a large number by recent historical standards. Is it a good career move? It depends on how far back you look.

For most of the 1990s, running for governor as a House Member was a bad bet. Between 1990 and 2001, just four of 29 House Members who ran for governor succeeded, according to Congressional Quarterly.

The current crop of contenders, however, is undoubtedly hoping for a climate more like the 2002-2003 campaign cycle. That's when five of eight sitting House Members who tried to win the governorship succeeded: John Baldacci (D-Maine), Rod Blagojevich (D-Ill.), Bob Ehrlich (R-Md.), Ernie Fletcher (R-Ky.) and Bob Riley (R-Ala.).

Conversations with politicos, including several former House Members who mounted unsuccessful bids for governor, cite a litany of obstacles. The most obvious is that House Members represent just a district, not the entire state. . .

And it's not only statewide officials who have an advantage against House Members. When Rep. Mark Green (R-Wis.) runs for governor next year, he'll face Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker in the GOP primary. Despite being a local officeholder, Walker will actually have a constituency that's almost 40 percent bigger than Green's.

Actually, the odds in Wisconsin are even worse. No sitting member of Congress has ever been elected governor of Wisconsin. None. Never. Many have run, but none has been chosen.

CORRECTION. An alert reader points out that Cadwallader Washburn, in fact, was elected governor in 1871, while a member of the House. That is what we call the exception that proves the rule. I stand corrected. Washburn, by the way, was slated by the party bosses in return for a promise he would never run against either of the sitting U.S. Senators.

Walker: Selling Milwaukee or himself?

-- Mike Konopacki cartoon, via WisOpinion.com

The Green Bay Press Gazette, which first covered Scott Walker's ticket giveaway during his self-promotional Harley ride around Wisconsin's media markets, editorializes on the subject and offers this capsulized view of its longer edit:

Issue
Scott Walker’s tickets

Our view
Voters and Milwaukee County taxpayers will have to decide whether Walker was representing Milwaukee County or selling himself when he gave thousands of dollars in tickets away

Is it the Jessica syndrome?

There's some debate about whether Jessica Simpson is really as ditzy as she presents herself, or whether it's a persona she has adopted.

Then there is Jessica McBride. She defends Scott Walker's taxpayer-paid Harley ride by saying:
Democratic pundits would have you believe Scott Walker's Harley Ride was only about political gain in the Wisconsin gubernatorial race (yes, they're still talking about it in recent columns). But the ride also stopped in Rockford, Ill., and St. Paul, Mn.
She's in the media business, and hubby Paul Bucher is running a statewide campaign to try to be AG, so it is hard to believe Jessica doesn't know that Rockford's television market covers Rock County in Wisconsin, and that Minneapolis-St. Paul TV is the only network TV most western Wisconsin voters get. The Twin Cities market includes seven Wisconsin counties and about 6% of Wisconsin voters. The only market Walker missed was Duluth, MN, which covers Superior and six surrounding counties in Wisconsin. Maybe next trip.

You can see the route mapped out on her blog, McBride Media Matters. So, what do you think? Is she just playing dumb?

Kohl to Bush: Do yourself a favor, name a moderate


Both Wisconsin Senators are members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that will review the President's Supreme Court nominee(s). One of them, Herb Kohl, has some advice for the President in an op ed in Sunday's Journal Sentinel:

As President Bush considers O'Connor's replacement over the next several days, he would be well-served to find a well-respected nominee who will put a commitment to the rule of law, to moderation and to the interests of justice for all Americans above any rigid ideology or agenda.

The president faces an important choice. He can choose to consult with Republicans and Democrats alike and find a consensus nominee, or he can choose an extremist nominee certain to cause a partisan and bitter confirmation battle.

Bucher gets a slap from hometown paper

Waukesha County DA Paul Bucher, an attorney general wannabe, got some pretty sharp criticism in an editorial from his hometown Waukesha Freeman. The paper, for whom rabid right-wing talker Mark Belling is a columnist, is not part of the vast liberal media conspiracy.

The issue is open meetings, and whether a governmental body can break the open meetings law by discussing things by e-mail. Here's the editorial.

Open government is one of those Wisconsin traditions that registers well with voters, even if the recent state budget was written in secret. It's a bad issue to be on the wrong side of, and you can expect Bucher's opponents to make some hay with it.

Sunday, July 17, 2005

Walker's no Brando on a bike

Stuart Carlson cartoon, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Joel McNally in a Capital Times column:

When I was growing up, my favorite outlaw biker was Marlon Brando in "The Wild One." There's that great scene where Brando roars into town with his scruffy pack of motorcycle reprobates.

Somebody on the street asks him what he's rebelling against. "Whattaya got?" snarls Brando. Outlaw bikers have really changed.

Today County Executive Scott Walker roars into small towns around the state on a Harley, tells somebody on the street to visit the Milwaukee County Zoo and then meets with local reporters to talk about his candidacy for governor of Wisconsin.

The biggest difference between Brando and Walker is that Brando was more honest.

Friday's post: Walker campaign planned Harley trip.

Matt Cooper: What I told the grand jury

Time reporter Matt Cooper, who narrowly escaped going to jail to protect his source, Karl Rove, writes in the new issue of the magazine about what he told the grand jury.

"Patrick Fitzgerald, the special counsel, told me that he would prefer that I not discuss the matter, and I suspect he said the same thing to White House officials who are now treating his request as a command and refusing to comment on the case. I don't know if I can illuminate this confounding investigation, but I can at least explain my small part in it. Like the blindfolded man and the elephant, all I know is what seems to be in front of me," Cooper writes.

"Was it through my conversation with Rove that I learned for the first time that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA and may have been responsible for sending him? Yes. Did Rove say that she worked at the "agency" on "WMD"? Yes."

Read it here.

Easy come, easy go: Arnold gives up $5-million magazine deal after drawing fire

Didn't even have a chance to post this one before the Governator backed down and said he would not take $5-million, $8-million or whatever from fitness magazines for "consulting" work. He still insists he sees no conflict, though, the AP reports:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Although Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger pulled the plug on at least $5 million in payments from fitness magazines, he said he never felt there was a conflict of interest. Schwarzenegger was criticized last week after it was revealed that he vetoed a bill regulating food supplements while taking money from glossies that profit from the industry. But in an interview with the Associated Press, he said his support for the magazines and nutritional supplements dates to his days as a body builder.

"This has nothing to do with money," he said in a telephone interview from Los Angeles. "Of course, for me, it was a love for the sport. I always felt that if I could achieve all I could through the sport, there are millions of young kids that can use that sport as a way of building their body and gaining self confidence."

The LA Times earlier report, which broke the story and raised the questions:

Gov. to Be Paid $8 Million by Fitness Magazines

The publications rely heavily on advertising for dietary supplements. Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill that would have regulated their use.


"SACRAMENTO — Two days before he was sworn into office, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger accepted a consulting job paying an estimated $8 million over five years to "further the business objectives" of a national publisher of health and bodybuilding magazines.The contract pays Schwarzenegger 1% of the magazines' advertising revenue, much of which comes from makers of nutritional supplements. Last year, the governor vetoed legislation that would have imposed government regulations on the supplement industry.

"According to records filed Wednesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Schwarzenegger entered into the agreement with a subsidiary of American Media Inc. on Nov. 15, 2003. The Boca Raton, Fla.-based company publishes Muscle & Fitness and Flex magazines, among others.Watchdog groups and state lawmakers called the contract — which refers to Schwarzenegger as "Mr. S" — a conflict of interest."

Ya think?

Saturday, July 16, 2005

Green going soft on war and peace?

Rep. Mark Green, leader of the Victory in Iraq caucus and would-be gov of Buckyland, is not gonna like this.

The Peace Majority Report, an online resource center, gives Green a 13% positive rating for his votes on peace issues on the group's scorecard. Green no doubt wanted to be 100% "wrong" in the eyes of those peace-lovers. But he accidentally voted with the peaceniks on 12 of 102 votes they monitored. His rating is the second worst in the delegation; F. Jim Sensenbrenner clocks in a 12%.

John Nichols at the Capital Times has a rundown on ratings for the whole Badger delegation. Hint: Two women have the best ratings.

48% for Taco Bell, 52% for invading Iraq

Matt Taibbi, who writes about politics for Rolling Stone, among others, on what's wrong with polling:

In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle on April 1, 2003, pollster Steven Kull said he believed that 40 percent of Americans were firmly behind the war, 20 percent firmly opposed it, and the remaining 40 percent supported it "either out of deference to the president or a sense of patriotism." He characterized the stance of the latter group as "pretty soft."

Well, no shit. Just as Kull predicted, the 40 percent firm-support number has remained an absolute constant since the beginning of the conflict. In the CNN/Gallup poll last week, that same 40 percent said they remained firmly in support of U.S. forces remaining in Iraq. Clearly, it's that "pretty soft" other 40 percent that's slipping. Those are the people I have a problem with, and it is with regard to those people that our polling system failed us two years ago and continues to fail today.

It seems fairly obvious that, in the course of the last few years, roughly 25-30 percent of the country has been influenced by the steady issue of news about increased violence and instability in Iraq. Apparently, a large percentage of Americans who supported the war two years ago have since become freaked out by the fact that, surprise, surprise, people are dying.

Which invites the question: If these people can't handle a few bad headlines, what exactly was their level of commitment to begin with? Pre-war polls, confined to the standard Coke-Pepsi either-or formula, didn't tell us much about that.

Maybe if the polls back then had been conducted differently, we might have had different results. Imagine a March 2003 poll that posed the following questions:

Would you yank your son out of college and send him to die for this bullshit?

Would you yourself be willing to give your life for this cause? If yes, grab your shit; there's a bus outside.

Read the whole thing on AlterNet.

Friday, July 15, 2005

Gun Guys speculate

on NRA announcement

From my friends The Gun Guys

Howdy Partners,

STOP THE PRESSES!

Wayne LaPierre and his friends at the NRA have announced that they'll be making a major announcement to the assembled press corp this coming Monday in Columbus, Ohio. In honor of this, we've assembled a list of the top ten things Wayne might announce at his press event:

1. NRA Takes Side In Long-Standing "Tastes Great, Less Filling" Debate. Sides With Tastes Great.

2. Wayne LaPierre announces secret French citizenship, resigns in disgrace.

3. NRA Chair announces he's changed his name to John Wayne LaPierre. Legally removes "LaPierre" at press conference next week.

4. Decries "Communist Liberal Nazi gun grabbers" for attempting to prevent the lawful sale of straws.

5. LaPierre and assembled NRA cronies announce they were "just kidding" about all their ridiculous propaganda. NRA instantly declared best practical joke of all time.

6. LaPierre announces NRA grant to go ahead and get John Lott the sex change he so desperately wanted. No word on if they'll pay to eliminate Ann Coulter's adams apple .

7. Urges Bush to nominate a Supreme Court Justice "that's at least shot somebody."

8. LaPierre and assembled NRA supporters just start yelling "yee-haw," have the rootin'est tootin'est square dance the press have seen since David Duke ran for office.

9. Press conference features surprise guest, the prince of darkness himself, who lauds their work which "has done wonders for the property values in Hell."

10. LaPierre kidnaps and ships non-sympathetic Columbus journalists to Florida, claims they pushed him, and pops a cap in all those commies.

Bada-Bingaman!

One of the incumbent U. S. Senators who came from DC for Gaylord Nelson's memorial service was New Mexico Democrat Jeff Bingaman, a friend of the Nelsons. This, from Grist, the online environmental magazine, helps explain the connection:
New Mexico Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D) is a mild-mannered moderate, but he's emerging as one of the Senate's more outspoken advocates for action on global warming. That's not saying much -- as Bingaman readily admits, Congress is woefully behind cities and states when it comes to innovation on stabilizing the climate. Still, he's chipper about some successes with the Senate energy bill, including an amendment he sponsored that would require utilities to produce 10 percent of their electricity from renewable sources by 2020. Now the test is whether that and a few other sunny provisions actually make it into law, he tells Amanda Griscom Little in an interview.

To Six Sigma or not? that is the question;

Walker decides to dance to CRG tune again

In mid-May, I wrote a piece about Milwaukee County Exec Scott Walker's relationship with Citizens for Responsible Government (CRG), the group that spearheaded the Tom Ament recall effort and helped put Walker into office. I suggested Walker danced to CRG's tune because he owed them big-time.

That brought a sharp response from Chris Kliesmet, one of the prime movers at CRG. Walker, he insisted, was not in their hip pocket. Quoting Kliesmet:

"Perhaps I should publish a list of all the things Walker HAS NOT done at our request. How about his not implementing Six Sigma at the county level after we gift wrapped free consulting and training from local business and academia. Of course, I do not expect liberals to even know what Six Sigma is. Better head to Google boys and girls. Oh, and when you get there add "City of Fort Wayne" to your search terms to discover how they used Six Sigma to save millions and create huge improvements in service quality."

Here's that item.

The list of things Walker HAS NOT done for CRG has just gotten shorter. As we read today in Spivak & Bice in the Journal Sentinel, Walker has opened that gift-wrapped package of free consulting and training to implement Six Sigma for county government. And, the Spice Boys suggest, if it works here Kliesmet has visions of taking it on the road for big bucks -- and with a glowing endorsement letter, no doubt, from Mr. Walker.

UPDATE: CRG responds with a rebuttal that even includes artwork of S&B with dunce and jester hats.

Time to "take the appropriate action"

-- Kevin Siers, Charlotte Observer, via Cagle.

The Republican Roveheads are trying to change the debate, using the GOP's talking points to: (a) slime Joe Wilson, husband of the CIA agent Rove helped to expose, and (b) try to change the debate to the question of whether Rove committed a crime. Whether all of the elements are present to convict Rove criminally, it is clear that what he did damaged national security. The "appropriate action" is to have him exit the government, whether through resignation or firing.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has produced a video on the Rove affair. Watch it, and you'll be ready to sign a petition asking for his ouster.

Paul Krugman on "Karl Rove's America."

Rehnquist watch

Mark Twain would have appreciated it. Reports of Chief Justice William Rehnquist's retirement, like those of Twain's death, appear to have been greatly exaggerated.

The NY Times:

WASHINGTON, July 14 - Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, ending months of increasingly frenzied speculation about his retirement plans, declared on Thursday night that he would continue to serve "as long as my health permits."

The chief justice's announcement, released without advance notice by his family, was completely unexpected and took the White House and Supreme Court officials by surprise. It first appeared on The Associated Press wire shortly before 9 p.m.

The statement said: "I want to put to rest the speculation and unfounded rumors of my imminent retirement. I am not about to announce my retirement. I will continue to perform my duties as chief justice as long as my health permits."

His health could fail at any time, of course. But he apparently is not
ready to come back and spend his remaining days in his native Shorewood.

Walker's campaign planned Harley trip

One of Milwaukee County Exec Scott Walker's defenses in explaining his taxpayer-financed Harley ride to get his face on TV in every media market covering the state has been:

"Gee, I did it last year and nobody complained. I guess this is just politics because I'm running for governor now." (Not his exact words, but a paraphrase conveying the essence of his statements.)

Actually, there were at least two open records requests made at the time for documents about the 2004 trip. Reviewing them, it's clear someone should have been asking questions and complaining a year ago, because Walker's campaign was heavily involved in planning the "non-political" trip.

Let's recap quickly, rather than assume everyone knows all of the facts (if you do know all the facts, advance to the next paragraph): Walker led a cycle ride across the state, organized by his government staff, in his office, on taxpayer time. He advertised it on his county-paid website, and took along a number of county staff people who were paid their county salaries during the ride. Media coverage has focused not on the basic question of whether taxpayers paid for his two campaign trips in the last two years, but on the fact that Walker gave away $19,000 worth of free tickets to businesses along the way this year. (I don't think anyone has determined what and how much he gave away in 2004).

One of the documents Walker's office coughed up last year is a memo (scroll down when it opens) from Jim Villa, a former Walker chief of staff who left Walker's office to run his re-election campaign in 2004. Villa is a the founder of a political consulting firm, the Markesan Group, whose main client is Walker's campaign for governor. John Hiller, Walker's campaign treasurer and attack dog in the 2004 exec race, is a partner. Brian Fraley, a longtime GOP operative, is the third member. Walker announced the hiring of a campaign manager this week, but Villa and Co. are running the race.

Villa's memo explains, in some detail, how he is personally going to ride the route of Walker's Harley trip in advance, to check the route, scout locations, and generally take note of problems that needed to be solved or plans that needed to be made to make sure the trip all goes smoothly. He raises issues like making sure press contacts are set up, getting an intern assigned to do advance on the actual trip, getting rooms, T-shirts, communication devices, and other needs.

Villa acting in his role of campaign consultant, sent the document by e-mail to Walker and Walker staffer Dorothy Moore on their personal e-mail accounts, not to their Milwaukee county addresses. It would not have turned up on an open records request, except that he also sent one to Walker staffer Steve Mokrohisky at his county address. He also copied Hiller, his partner in the political firm.

If this trip was just to promote Milwaukee tourism, as Walker insists, why would the people he is paying to run his campaign for governor be making the arrangements and plans?

Villa wasn't spending his time because he wants more people to visit the Milwaukee zoo. His job is to get Walker elected governor, and that's what this trip was all about.

I have not seen the documents on the 2005 trip yet. There may be no Markesan Group correspondence, most likely because they have gotten better at covering their tracks. But you can bet they were involved up their eyeballs in the now-controversial 2005 ride as well, after creating the model in 2004.

Raise the speed limit, save speeders bail money

State Sen. Tom Reynolds (R-West Allis) is on a roll. He just keeps talking.

We mentioned his proposal to raise the freeway speed limit to 75 in Wisconsin the other day, with his rationale: Everybody drives that fast anyway, so let's legalize it. (His bill to legalize marijuana is still in the Legislative Reference Bureau for drafting, I think.)

In an Appleton Post-Crescent story, he offers some more reasons to go to 75:

1. They have a 75 limit in a bunch of other states. Like Utah, where Reynolds plans to vacation this summer. U. Utah Phillips, folksinger and raconteur, used to say he was from Utah, "Where the men are men and the sheep are nervous, trying to stay away from the Mormons and the Republicans." But, hey, if everybody's doing it, let's legalize it.

2. It would save people money on speeding tickets. Yes, he really said that. As one sophisticated political insider said in an e-mail (I just say that so he'll keep sending me stuff), why not reduce fines for embezzlement and make Wisconsin more business friendly? Or lower drunk driving fines, which are really expensive. Or eliminate traffic fines altogether and save everybody a bundle. Or quit writing speeding tickets. Etc. etc.

Do you detect a flaw in the argument, or is it just me?

Maybe the money speeders save on speeding tickets could help pay for the extra gas they'll use. Mileage decreases rapidly if you drive over 60, the EPA says. Every 5 miles an hour you drive over 60 is like adding 15 cents a gallon to the cost of gasoline, which is plenty high already.

Thursday, July 14, 2005

Almost belated: Happy Bastille Day

I know, I know, red-blooded American patriots don't like the French, because they had the good sense to stay out of the war in Iraq.

Of course, the Congressman who started calling French fries "Freedom Fries" has now called for the U.S. to end the war.

But, judging from some of the comments I hear on radio since the London terrorist attacks, the only way the French may get back in the good graces of some of those hard liners is if, God forbid, they suffer a terrorist attack of their own.

Vive la France!

Quote, unquote

"The White House is determined to defend Karl Rove on the Valerie Plame CIA outing by sticking to the “he never mentioned her name” defense. Rove did say Joe Wilson’s WIFE worked for the CIA, which unless the guy is the King of Bahrain or an Elder in the Mormon Church sounds pretty definitive to me."

-- Will Durst, The Progressive.

Drip . . . drip . . . drip

It has been said that if all of the Watergate information had come out at once that Nixon would not have been forced from the presidency. The coverup was worse than the crime, and it was the steady drip of information, day after day, and week after week, that brought him down.

Which brings us to:

Day 4: What did the President know and when did he know it? DailyKos link

Cause of pedophilia discovered -- liberalism

Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) has discovered what causes priests to become pedophiles. It's a liberal atmosphere, which is why there were so many cases in liberal Boston, he says. The Boston Globe has more.

Santorum, a might-be presidential candidate, has gotten attention in the past for linking "man on child" and "man on dog" sex with homosexuality, describing them as deviant behaviors that threatened traditional marriage. Earlier this year, he apologized for comparing the Democrats blocking President Bush's judicial nominees to the Nazi leader, Adolf Hitler.

Word up, dude

Cartoon by Cameron Cardow, Ottawa Citizen at Cagle.com

Rep, Mark Green, of the Victory in Iraq caucus (I didn't make that up, he organized it) says the problem is that we never hear good news, just the bad stuff about Iraq. You know, like people getting killed.

But Green is not alone. Help is on the way.

Toby Barlow at the Huffington Post reports:

“Several Senate Republicans denounced other lawmakers and the news media on Thursday for unfavorable depictions of the Iraq war and the Pentagon urged members of Congress to talk up military service to help ease a recruiting shortfall.”

Thanks to the Republican efforts, conversations between young white working class eighteen year-olds now run along these lines:


CHEESE: Wuddup G
GREG: Hey Cheese. What are you doin’?
CHEESE: Yo, blood, I’m just heading down to the recruitment center
Read the rest

Illinois moves to steal Wisconsin jobs, research

The headline was just to get your attention, and oversimplifies the issue a little, but only a little.

Here are two stories about what states are doing on stem cell research. The Wisconsin Legislature may have the distinction of being farther out on the fringe on the stem cell research issue than anyone else in the country. The latest:

Illinois. Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich signed an executive order on Tuesday making Illinois the fourth state to devote public money to embryonic stem cell research. A state program will distribute $10 million in grants in its first year to seek treatments and cures for conditions like Alzheimer's, spinal cord injuries and heart disease

"It is the necessary and proper role of government to take action when no one else will," Mr. Blagojevich, a Democrat, said at Children's Memorial Hospital in Chicago, where he signed the order. "Unfortunately, the federal government has decided to sit on the sidelines." Four years ago, President Bush limited federal financing for stem cell research to existing stem cell lines.

Wisconsin. Anti-cloning legislation passed by the state Assembly last month has triggered a debate over what is more important: Economic development linked to the potential for new cures or ethical concerns over research that uses human embryos.

The debate has pitted Republicans against Republicans and stem cell pioneer James Thomson against Rep. Steve Kestell (R-Elkhart Lake), the lawmaker behind the bill.

Action Alert! Stand by your man, Karl Rove

ACTION ALERT: STAND AGAINST THE DEMOCRATIC LYNCHING OF KARL ROVE! SEND A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO AMERICA'S #1 SON!

Patriotic Action Item

ATTENTION TRUE PATRIOTS: Once again, the hateful Democratic attack machine has shifted into high gear, intent on abusing facts and iron-clad evidence to turn Americans against beloved Presidential pal and über-patriot, Karl Rove. You can do your part to soften the trauma of this travesty by sending Karl a personalized e-mail of support and understanding. Simply click the link below to tell Karl how you're positive that he's INNOCENT – and even if he had, say, determined that compromising our nation's security by outing some globe-trotting bitch in a power suit just to even a petty score, well then good on him, buster!

Click here.

Summer camp for leggies?

Should legislators go to summer camp to get a little education?

Susan Lampert Smith thinks so.

Her Wisconsin State Journal column suggests opponents of stem cell research spend some time at a camp for kids with juvenile diabetes, then make a couple of other topical stops, like Florence, which is shutting down its school district.

While they're at it, maybe a few of the Milwaukee-bashers could spend a little time in the central city, getting a feel for urban problems -- aside from the problems at Miller Park or the lakefront. We could call it Camp Courage, if any of them would get out of their cars.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Take a moment today for Gaylord Nelson


Fritz Albert photo Posted by Picasa

Gaylord Nelson once told me this was his favorite photo of himself, taken in 1995 by a longtime Madison friend and photographer, Fritz Albert. He didn't say why, but I suspect it was not just because he looked good, but because the setting said everything about who he was. It is worth more than 1,000 words. On this day that Wisconsin honors his memory, the photo is a reminder of his legacy.

The public is invited to participate in the memorial service at 12:15 p.m. today (Wednesday, July 13) in the Capitol rotunda, and join the family at a reception from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. at Monona Terrace.

If you can't do that, slow yourself down, just for a minute, and think about what one person can accomplish. Nelson was a small-town boy who truly changed the world, because he never doubted that he could.

Quote, unquote

"Providing tickets to media outlets to have them visit and report on attractions is not uncommon. In fact, it is really not unlike the Green Bay Packers giving out passes to the press to cover their games. It does not guarantee good coverage, but it does ensure that they will cover the game."

-- Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker, justifying giving away $19,000 in free tickets to Milwaukee tourist attractions during a statewide motorcycle trip, by equating Mexican Fiesta to a Packers game.

Strange bedfellows say "Veto the budget"

It's an unlikely pairing, but both the liberal Capital Times and conservative blogger Brian Christianson are telling Gov. Jim Doyle he should veto the entire state budget passed by the Republican-controlled legislature.

The Cap Times argues policy, calling the GOP budget "the most serious assault on public education this state has seen in many years."

Christianson argues politics. Doyle and the Democrats need a little juice, he says (actually, he says Viagra), and vetoing the whole thing would cause disarray in the GOP ranks. "Doyle simply rolls a stink bomb back under the tent and then steps back to watch the chaos; before stepping forward to define what 4 more years of Jim Doyle will look like," he says.

Well, it certainly would liven up the summer.

Who you gonna call? Strikebusters!

There is more than a little irony that Wackenhut, the second largest private security firm in the country, is the target of a union organizing drive.

A protest is planned today in Milwaukee at the local Wackenhut office during the NAACP national convention to protest the company's refusal to allow its workers to organize. The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is trying to organize Wackenhut workers across the country, as evidenced by 91 unfair labor practice complaints filed against the company in the last five years.

Wackenhut, founded by an ex-FBI agent, made its reputation as a brass-knuckle security company that would do whatever dirty work needed to be done -- including strike-breaking.

The firm has a long anti-labor history that often has involved providing security for strikebreakers -- let's just call them scabs and get it over with -- who are crossing picket lines during a strike.

I had never heard of Wackenhut until 1977, when they were hired by Madison Newspapers, Inc. to guard the plant where the Capital Times and Wisconsin State Journal are produced. Who were they guarding it from? The 200 striking members of five unions -- journalists, printers, press operators, mailers, and circulation managers.

Like bringing Chicago lawyers to the bargaining table, hiring Wackenhut for security was a sign the newspapers meant business. And they did. When the strike ended 18 months later, there were no unions in the building, and strikers had been permanently replaced by scabs. (I speak from experience.)

We used to talk, through the cyclone fence, to and try to raise the consciousness of the Wackenhuts (which is what we called them), none of whom were local. They were young, underpaid, but in need of jobs. "You're on the wrong side," we'd tell them, explaining why we were on the picket line and urging them to join us. But we never had a taker.

It's with great interest, then, that I read the releases and fact sheets about the current organizing struggle. Some Wackenhuts today make only $7.45 an hour, and most of them have less than an hour's training in handling emergencies, crime, accidents, first or evacuation.

They clearly belong on the union side of the picket line, not providing muscle for management.

There is much, much more to the Wackenhut record. I haven't even scratched the surface. Wackenhut compiled dossiers on millions of Americans in the 1950s and 1960s. It has worked covertly with the CIA and DEA. It runs detention facilities for Homeland Security, including one where detainees staged a hunger strike to protest their treatment. Source Watch, a project of the Center for Media and Democracy, has much more. Or Google for yourself. You'll be amazed.

Undoubtedly one of the nagging questions for the management of Wackenhut, now a subsidiary of a Danish conglomerate is: If our guards are unionized, how on earth will we be able to dispatch them to break strikes? It's not something the SEIU is likely to waive in its contract, if it ever gets one.

And is Wackenhut workers go on strike, who they gonna call -- Strikebusters?

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

Green campaign a little short of green

Rep. Mark Green's campaign puts its best face forward on its fundraising in the governor's race, hoping that no one has a memory that goes back farther than a month or two.

Green's press release claims he has raised more money than any other challenger for governor in Wisconsin history at this point in the campaign.

He also claims he has "amassed nearly $2-million."

And he seems proud to say that only 2% of the contibutions he's received in this reporting period are from political action committees.

What Green's not leveling with you about:

He started his campaign for governor May 1 by transferring almost $1.3-million from his Congressional campaign account -- Most of it special interest money given to him to influence his votes in the House of Representatives.

In fact, $800,000 of the money in his Congressional account was from PACs, most of which care only about federal issues and could't give a hoot who the governor of Wisconsin is. The State Elections Board allowed Green to use a loophole in the law to transfer all of that money into his governor's campaign. There's even $30,000 or so from Tom DeLay's PAC, a little thank you for standing by him and voting with DeLay 91% of the time. But I digress.

That PAC money transfer is $800,000 he could not legally raise now, because state candidates can't take money from federal PACs. Jim Doyle or Scott Walker could not accept that money; they would be illegal contributions.

Walker and Doyle can raise up to a limit of $485,000 in state PAC money. Green can raise $485,000 on top of the $800,000 in PAC money he's already raised.

So Green has a huge advantage. But when you look at his finance report and keep those numbers in mind, you'll find he hasn't done all that well.

At this point four years ago, Doyle had over $1-million in the bank -- all of it raised under state campaign laws, none of it laundered in a transfer from Washington. Green has actually raised only $678,000 to run for governor.

And he hasn't exactly "amassed nearly $2-million." His bank balance is $1.75-million -- so he has "amassed" less than $500,000 since he started his run with that $1.3-million in laundered money.

That said, I'm sure it still beats the pants off Scott Walker.

"Balancing" history at Lincoln Memorial

I wish I were making this up, because it is one of those "too bad to be true" items. But I'm not.

When you think of the Lincoln Memorial on the National Mall, what's the first image that comes to mind? In all likelihood, it is Dr. Martin Luther King's "I have a dream' speech with hundreds of thousands of civil rights supporters gathered on the mall.

Demonstrations for gay rights and reproductive rights, and anti-war rallies also have filled the mall. Some of those events are included in brief clips in an educational eight-minute video that has been shown at the memorial since 1994.

The Bush administration has taken steps to "balance" the coverage. The National Park Service has bought footage of President George W. Bush, his father, pro-Iraq War demonstrations and anti-gun control rallies from news organizations for inclusion in a revised video -- which will certainly be missing some of that left-wing rally footage.

People for the American Way and a public employee group filed FOIA requests in October 2003 after being alerted that Park Service officials planned to develop a “more balanced” version of the videotape to satisfy the objections of right wing organizations. The right wing organizations reportedly complained that brief segments of footage showing gay rights, reproductive rights, and anti-Vietnam War demonstrations implied that “Lincoln would have supported homosexual and abortion ‘rights’ as well as feminism.”

Here's more from Environmental Media Services.

Home-schoolers to Reynolds:

Thanks, but no thanks

That tax credit for parents who home-school or send their kids to private schools -- the one State Sen. Tom Reynolds sold his soul and voted for the Republican state budget to get?

Never mind.

The home-school folks who would get the $100 per child say they don't want it, and are asking Gov. Jim Doyle to veto it, Spivak and Bice report in the Journal Sentinel.

It seems that many of the people who teach their children themselves don't like the idea of government interference, and worry the money may lead to strings being attached. And they don't like spending money period; Reynolds' credit would cost the state $14.6-million a year.

Reynolds, a home-schooler himself, already said he wouldn't take the credit, after being criticized for pushing a provision that benefited him personally.

Maybe it's time to call the whole thing off.

Earlier post, "Tom Reynolds, a Cicero for our times."

Patriot Act just about perfect: F. Jim

Despite some concerns that maybe, just maybe, it would infringe on civil liberties guaranteed to Americans by the Constitution, it turns out the Patriot Act has been damn near perfect.

It's worked so well, in fact, that Rep. F. Jim Sensenbrenner, House Judiciary chair and pride of the Badger state, wants to renew the law and make it permanent. That way there won't be a need for any more of those pesky reviews to see if it's being abused. (Does anybody think the fact that it needed to be renewed might have served as a check on abuses?)

Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead, says F. Jim, in a story in today's Journal Sentinel.

And, falling right into lockstep, Mark Green. His campaign newsletter says:


This week, Mark, as a member of Chairman Jim Sensenbrenner's Judiciary Committee, will be playing a leading role in helping to make permanent the anti-terrorism provisions included in the USA PATRIOT Act – a bill Mark helped craft in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on America. While the PATRIOT Act has been assailed by many on the left (and some on the right), its detractors often deal with half-truths and never seem to have any examples of actual abuse to point to.

See, no problems? What's all the fuss about?

UPDATE: Journal Sentinel, playing catch-up, says questions are being raised about F. Jim's meddling. Notable by their absence: Any comments from Wisconsin electeds.


Tide rolls in on Rove


The tide is rolling in on Karl Rove.

Monday's White House press briefing was the worst Bush spinmeister Scott McClellan has endured.

Dana Milbank of the Washington Post reports:

"The 32-minute pummeling was perhaps the worst McClellan received since he got the job two years ago. His eyes were red and tired. He wiggled his foot nervously behind the lectern and robotically refused to answer no fewer than 35 questions about Rove and the outing of the CIA's Valerie Plame. Twenty-two times McClellan repeated that an 'ongoing' investigation prevented him from explaining the gap between his past statements and the facts."
Howard Kurtz has much more in his Media Notes column in the Post. And Wonkette has a devastating review of McClellan's performance.

Past White House briefings on the CIA leak are in today's NY Times, offering a chance to compare what the White House said then versus Monday's briefing.

Rep. Louise Slaughter of New York wants Rove fired and has started an online pink slip drive. Sen.John Kerry is collecting signatures on a letter to the President making the same request.

Not to be outdone, MoveOn has a petition, too.

And here's a brand new blog,Fire Him Now.

Walker slips and slides on ticket giveaway;

When is a cycle dealership a media outlet?

The Scott Walker Harley campaign tour of Wisconsin and adjacent media markets only lasted five days, but the questions and controversy already have a lifespan twice that long and appears headed for a much longer run.

Now, the Journal Sentinel reports today, a Wausau TV station has become the second media outlet in the state to return freebies from Walker. It's the station Walker had cited as a success story, claiming his trip was responsible for a crew coming to do a story on the Mitchell Park Domes.

In defending the trip, Walker said it already had yielded a benefit because Channel 7 had followed up by sending a crew to shoot a travel piece at the Domes and interview him. Records show the station received $725 in free tickets.

But in a letter to Walker's office, Station General Manager Allan Lancaster wrote:

"We had been planning for several months to do that story, and interviewed you only because your staff refused to allow us to speak with any other official from the Domes."
Lancaster said the story will not air.

The more questions Walker tries to answer, the more questions he raises. His explanation of how $19,000 worth of free tickets were distributed has shifted more times than his borrowed Harley did during the trip.

This from the Walker campaign blog:

At each stop on my Harley tour, we handed out packets to each media outlets (sic). Along with information about the various attractions, we included tickets to various spots. All of the tickets were donated to us.

That has been the story ever since details of Walker's "Sleazy Rider " tour first came to light. Walker and his staff have maintained that free tickets went only to media organizations, but now it seems clear they haven't been telling the full story.

In the original Green Bay Press Gazette story, "Walker defended the giveaway as a promotional gimmick to get the media to pass along the tickets to their readers, listeners or viewers. Or, he said, individual reporters could use the tickets and craft a story from it."

In fact his Communications Specialist, Fran Rudig, said "the office was required to track all tickets and record which news organizations received which tickets." Rudig said, "None of the tickets, she said, were given to the public. If ordinary citizens requested a packet along the tour, she said, they were given information only." Story.

In his letter to the editors of the Press Gazette, Walker said, "In addition to talking with local media, our staff gave out promotional packets with information on the various vacation spots... In fact, an inventory was taken to insure that all of the tickets went out to the various media outlets and not to me, staff or other riders." Letter

Notice Walker's careful use of words as to who didn't get tickets. It's a rather carefully crafted, Clintonian use of language. "It depends on what you mean by tickets," or "it depends on what you mean by the public."

And just the other day, Walker said to the Press Gazette, “I think it’s completely legitimate to give free tickets to news organizations." Story.

But now we learn that it wasn't just media organizations that received the freebies from Walker. The Journal Sentinel reported that, "In addition to the Press-Gazette and WRLO, tickets went to two newspapers, 10 television stations, 14 radio stations, two Platteville business groups, three Harley-Davidson motorcycle dealerships and two other businesses, records show. JS story.

But the JS doesn't identify the business groups, three Harley-Davidson dealerships or other businesses.

What's Walker's excuse for giving freebies to businesses, which might fit under the definition of "the public" and "ordinary citizens"?

What is the Walker campaign's relationship to the non-media organizations that got free tickets?
Can we expect the three Harley-Davidson motorcycle dealerships to be sending their television new crews down to Milwaukee to do a story the Betty Brinn Children's Museum?

Clearly this is not, and should not be the end of the story.

"Get your motor running..."

UPDATE: Walker offers a new defense; the governor's office knew about the plan and let the State Fair participate. But State Fair says differently. And another TV station returns the freebies. JS story.

Do-As-We-Say-Not-As-We-Do Department

We don't need more and more government programs to try and run people's lives. --Republican State Sen. Ted Kanavas.

He was talking about health care, which clearly doesn't need any government help or intervention because the system is working so well.

But Kanavas and his Republican colleagues think we need government to tell us how to conduct our personal lives, conception to the grave. Almost every day they propose another way to restrict personal decision-making and the right to privacy.

And, since they can't trust individuals or even local governments to do the right thing, they want state government to run people's lives.

Over the last month, an AP story points out, Republicans have introduced bills to force municipalities to sell public land to utilities, wipe out 21 local anti-smoking ordinances, limit government spending and forbid municipalities from setting their own minimum wages. That's not the whole list, just recent items.

“That's what the Legislature is for. We're the people's body," a spokesman for Speaker Jon Gard said. Right. And they're going to do what they think is best for the people whether the people want it or not.

“The myth of the GOP being the party of local control has been exploded. They're not there to govern. They're there to rule," said Madison Alderman Austin King. That's right. Majority rule. If only we didn't have any checks and balances and that pesky governor.

“The Republicans have a statewide agenda that can only be done through state control," said Joe Heim, a UW-LaCrosse political science prof.

Maybe Kanavas should say: "We're from the Republican Party, and we're here to run your life."

Why we must break the Open Meetings Law

The Journal Sentinel "expose" Monday that the state budget was mostly put together in secret included an interesting rationale from State Sen. Scott (Gatsby) Fitzgerald, co-chair of the Joint Finance Committee.

The Republicans, who hold a 12-4 majority on Joint Finance, would meet in secret, sometimes shuffling and out of the room to avoid having a quorum, sometimes not bothering with the niceties. There, the story says, they "make tentative spending decisions, craft complicated packages on thorny issues such as health care, and then ratify those closed-door deals in public sessions."

"Fitzgerald defended the process, however. Often, he said, lawmakers need time before the Finance Committee convenes to be sure they agree on an issue before taking an official vote. Privacy breeds candor, he said, with committee members "much more willing to talk about senators' personalities, and quirks and problems than they would be in the open."

Just one problem. The whole premise behind the state's Open Meeting Law is that debate should take place and decisions should be made in the public eye. Every time the GOP majority works out a deal and puts the votes together in private, it is breaking the law.

Previous post:"News flash: Budget written in secret!!!"

Monday, July 11, 2005

Can you say stonewall?

AP story via CNN:

White House won't comment on Rove and leak investigation


WASHINGTON (AP) -- For two years, the White House has insisted that presidential adviser Karl Rove had nothing to do with the leak of a CIA officer's identity. And President Bush said the leaker would be fired.

But Bush's spokesman wouldn't repeat any of those assertions Monday in the face of Rove's own lawyer saying his client spoke with at least one reporter about Valerie Plame's role at the CIA before she was identified in a newspaper column.

Rove described the woman to a reporter as someone who "apparently works" at the CIA, according to an e-mail obtained by Newsweek magazine.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan refused to discuss the matter at two news briefings Monday. He said he would not comment because the leak is the focus of a federal criminal investigation.

"The prosecutors overseeing the investigation had expressed a preference to us that one way to help the investigation is not to be commenting on it from this podium," McClellan said in response to a barrage of questions about Rove and the previous White House denials.
"I'm well aware, like you, of what was previously said," McClellan said. "And I will be glad to talk about it at the appropriate time." He said the appropriate time would be when the investigation is completed.

Fun and games at Club Gitmo

Look for boat people from Kansas to ask for asylum at Gitmo after this report, which Charlie Sykes takes as gospel:

Guantanamo Bay detainees play soccer,

eat well: US senator

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Inmates from the US-led war on terror held at the prison camp at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba are well treated, play outdoor sports, and have access to a broad Muslim-approved menu, a US senator who traveled to the site said.

US Senator Pat Roberts, a conservative Republican from Kansas, said on "Fox News Sunday" that he just returned from visiting the Guantanamo detention site.

"They have a Muslim menu down there of 113 dishes," said Roberts, chairman of the US Senate Intelligence Committee.

"I saw them playing soccer. I saw them playing ping-pong. I saw them playing ... I think it was volleyball," he said.

US camp guards "strictly observe with reverence all of the prayer calls, five times a day, 20 minutes," he said.

"And in regards to the health care, my word, they have better health care than many of my small communities in Kansas."

The Guantanamo detention site has been the focus of worldwide controversy following allegations that US forces have abused detainees. Leading members of the opposition Democratic Party want the site closed down.

Jeb Bush wants Christian program in schools

If you thought George W. Bush catered to the evangelicals to get ahead politically, you ain't seen nothing yet. Brother Jeb will outdo him every time.

Fresh from trying to make political points with his base by going after Michael Schiavo -- and failing -- Uncle Jeb moved right on.

Dara Kam of the Palm Beach Post reports:

TALLAHASSEE — Just before Father's Day, Gov. Jeb Bush announced that he wanted every public school in Florida to host a Christian-based program designed to increase fathers' participation in their children's lives.

The program, All Pro Dad, combines a biblical foundation with the draw of popular professional athletes to promote the belief that "the father is the head of the household" and that men should rely on God to help them be better parents and keep their marriages intact. It also encourages Bible reading.

"This is a really great program," Bush said at a news conference last month, though he did not make any reference to the project's Christian foundation. "The response of this program has been a success, and I hope it expands throughout the entire state to every school in every school district."


But critics say the program, which has a direct link on the Florida Department of Education Web site, clearly has Christian overtones and is part of a national effort by evangelicals who view public schools as recruiting fields. Read the rest here.

How not to spend a Sunday

The Sunday Journal Sentinel devoted a full page on Sunday to an exercise giving readers a chance to do their own version of the city budget.

Check this out and then ask yourself whether even one person spent a beautiful Wisconsin Sunday on this.

News flash: Budget written in secret!!!

The Journal Sentinel's Capitol team reports today, at great length, that the state budget passed by the legislature was written largely in secret, with little participation by citizens or even minority Democrats, and passed in the middle of the night.

To anyone who's followed the budget process, that's not exactly a bombshell.

I, for one, have complained regularly about it, but have felt like a voice in the wilderness. Here are a couple of my half dozen previous posts:

"Walking quorum breaks the law."

"No sunshine on the budget."

But today's story raises the obvious question: If this was going on, and everyone knew it was going on, why didn't anyone complain? If there was a single editorial about budget secrecy in a Wisconsin newspaper, I missed it. Even the Democrats didn't make any noise. Nor did the good government groups.

Prospects this will change for the next budget go-around? Slim and none.

Historical Society highlights Nelson resources

The Wisconsin Historical Society's website includes a section on former Governor and Senator Gaylord Nelson, with a biography, links to important Nelson documents (like the 1969 press release announcing the date for an environmental teach-in that became the first Earth Day), photos and more.

Check the Highlights Archives and go from there.

Nelson will be honored at a memorial service in the State Capitol rotunda at 12:15 p.m. on Wednesday, July 13. It is the first such Capitol service since one held in 1925 for Robert M. (Fighting Bob) LaFollette. That is entirely appropriate and fitting, since Gaylord Nelson is of that stature.

(Photo of Nelson at the Apostle Islands by Frank Wallick)




For those wishing to make a contribution in his memory, the family suggests the following:

Gaylord Nelson Memorial Fund
c/o The Wilderness Society
1615 M Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036

Gaylord Nelson Chair,
Institute for Environmental Studies
c/o University of Wisconsin Foundation
Post Office Box 8860
Madison, WI 53708-8860

Friends of the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore
Post Office Box 1574
Bayfield, WI 54814

Gaylord Nelson Studio of WisconsinEye
Post Office Box 949
Madison, WI 53701

Sunday, July 10, 2005

Feeling safer from terror now?

Cartoon by Stuart Carlson, Journal Sentinel


Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts writes:

Tell me again how the Iraq war has made us safer from terrorism.

Spin for me once more the theory of how, by drawing the terrorists' attention there, we've made ourselves more secure here.

Point out for me again how we've suffered no terrorist attack since the day President Bush took the fight to the enemy.

You'll have to speak up, though. It's going to be hard to hear you over the explosions and sirens and wails of the maimed in London.

more

Sensenbrenner meddles in appeals court case

The Chicago Tribune reports in Sunday's paper that Rep. F. Jim Sensenbrenner tried to get a federal appeals court to change its decision in a drug case. Why? He thought the sentence was too lenient.

From Maurice Possley's story:

" In an extraordinary move, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee privately demanded last month that the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago change its decision in a narcotics case because he didn't believe a drug courier got a harsh enough prison term. . .

Sensenbrenner, of course, thinks that is perfectly OK, but others don't. Back to the story:

"(S)ome legal experts believe the action by the Judiciary Committee chairman, who is an attorney, is a violation of House ethics rules, which prohibit communicating privately with judges on legal matters, as well as court rules that bar such contact with judges without contacting all parties.

"Further, the letter may be an intrusion on the Constitution's separation-of-powers doctrine, or, at least, the latest encroachment by Congress upon the judiciary, analysts said.
"

Today's earlier post on Sensenbrenner profile in the Journal Sentinel.

UPDATE: Folkbum Jay Bullock contrasts the Trib and JS coverage.

Lights back on in Minnesota state government

The partial shutdown of Minnesota state government is over, 10 days after a deadlock on the state budget

The situation is just the opposite of Wisconsin. The governor, Tim Pawlenty, is a Republican, but the Dems (DFL in Minnesota) control the legislature. They finally agreed to a compromise Saturday morning.

Here's how the Minneapolis Star-Tribune explained it the new deal in an editorial:

"It will stop the fiscal bleeding in most of the state's school districts, and initiate a performance pay system for teachers. It will preserve much of the state's health care safety net for the working poor, improving coverage for those with costly illnesses. While it will raise school property taxes, it will also send more state money to cities and counties, curbing their property tax appetite. And it will put a deterrent to smoking back into state law, by raising the price of a pack of cigarettes 75 cents.

"None of those things could be said about the skimpy budget that Pawlenty proposed six months ago. This session's central drama has been the effort by DFL and moderate Republican legislators to do better by education, health care and the rest than the governor's initial budget did."


From that brief description, I could live with that budget. What is it that makes our neighbors so different from us, and even willing to pay more taxes to pay for the needs of education and health care. Is it just that they are closer to Canada?

Sensenbrenner: "I ain't goin' nowhere"

F. Jim Sensenbrenner, the Wisconsin Congressman that liberals love to hate lately, comes off better than you might have expected in a profile by Craig Gilbert in Sunday's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

Sensenbrenner has made news recently as a champion of the Patriot Act, and for his high-handed and childish handling of a hearing of the House Judiciary that he chairs. As Jon Stewart said on The Daily Show, Sensenbrenner "literally took his gavel and went home."

Norman Ornstein, a well-known pundit and scholar who had an acrimonious dispute with Sensenbrenner over a bill before the House, calls the veteran congressman "the most obdurate human being I've ever encountered" and says the hearing flap has made him "a poster child for arrogance and abuse of power," Gilbert reports, in the tone of what has been written about F. Jim on the Internet in the last month.Sample.

But F. Jim has his defenders, including an ACLU activist, who says he's prickly but not a total wingnut.

Worst news: F. Jim says he has no plans to leave Congress after his term limit as Judiciary chair expires at the end of 2006. He'll find some other way to wreak havoc, he says. (Well, that's not quite what he says, but you get the drift.) And Bryan Kennedy, mounting a second campaign for F. Jim's seat, missed a rare opportunity to get in the newspaper because he "could not be reached for comment."

John Prine: Less political, but no less fun

It has been a struggle, but so far I have managed to keep my musical taste out of this blog.

No more.

I discovered something called "Blue State Jukebox" and the current selection is the new John Prine album, so all bets are off.

I've been a Prine devotee since about 1969, when we both lived in Illinois -- he was delivering mail and I was editing a newspaper -- and his first album was about to come out (I still call them albums today, which is another sign that I am up in years.) I don't mean to suggest that I knew him; we lived in different towns together, as they say.

In those days he was more political -- but so was everyone. "Sam Stone" told of the plight of a Vietnam veteran. "Illegal Smile" was about marijuana but a whole lot more ("I dreamed the police heard everything I thought; what then? I went to court and the judge's name was Hoffman.") "Paradise" was about the coal companies ravaging the environment.

His current album, "Fair and Square," has a line about "some cowboy from Texas" who "starts his own war in Iraq." But mostly this album is classic John Prine. If you don't know what that means, do yourself a favor and find out what you've been missing. John Prine website.

Saturday, July 09, 2005

Morning-after pills don't "cause" unsafe sex

I'm sure the Republicans who want to ban the morning-after pill from UW campuses don't want to be bothered with any facts.

But here's an interesting report from Reuters Health:

"Allowing 'morning-after' contraceptive pills to be sold over the counter does not increase their use, suggesting that easy availability does not lead to an upsurge in unprotected sex, British investigators report."

Quote, unquote

"The relations with, uhh — Europe are important relations, and they've, uhh — because, we do share values. And, they're universal values, they're not American values or, you know — European values, they're universal values. And those values — uhh — being universal, ought to be applied everywhere."

—George W. Bush, at a press conference with European Union dignitaries, Washington, D.C., June 20, 2005

Ethical questions on Walker's Harley ride

continue to grow; freebies worth $19,000

The ethical questions surrounding Scott Walker's motorcycle trip, paid for by the taxpayers and replete with free goodies for reporters, have finally surfaced in his hometown newspaper.

"Ethical questions arise over Walker's tour to promote county," the Journal Sentinel headline at the top of the Metro section reads. (Too bad it's the Saturday paper, but better than nothing, which is what we've had for the past week.)

The value of free tickets handed out by Walker on the trip, which hit all media markets that cover the state, was more than $19,000, the JS reported. Story

And, except for the Green Bay Press Gazette, which broke the story on the freebies, it appears no other reporter or media outlet turned down the tickets for everything from the Lake Express high-speed ferry to a race at Milwaukee Mile, the zoo, festivals, a PGA golf tournament, and more. The package offered to the Press Gazette was worth more than $500 alone.

Walker said earlier this week that it had all been worth it, because he saw a family from Rockford, Ill. at the zoo and a TV station from Wausau came to Milwaukee to do a feature on the Mitchell Park Domes. A pretty small return for Milwaukee tourism, compared to the political lift Walker got from the trip (before it turned sour.)

Walker insists the trip was about promoting Milwaukee tourism, not his candidacy for governor. But for the first time, the JS says, he "concedes (the trip) helped boost his name recognition in key media markets as he campaigns for the 2006 Republican gubernatorial nomination."

Well, duh. That's what the trip is all about. It could just be coincidence that the first time he did it was last year, when he was already an unofficial candidate for governor. But I don't think so.

It's unfortunate that most of the publicity and ethical questions seem to be about the free tickets. What about the fact that the whole trip was put together by county staff, or that the county (read taxpayers) picked up the $2600 cost of the trip, promoted it on county websites, and that several top county staffers traveled with Walker while drawing their county salaries.

To me, that's worse than the freebies. Walker has blatantly used his office to promote his candidacy.

County Supervisors Gerry Broderick and John Weishan filed an open records request Friday with Walker's office, asking for a full accounting of the trip.

Don't be surprised if there are more twists to the story as more details become public.

Rep. Mark Green, Walker's primary opponent, has declined to comment on the ethical mess, as has Gov. Jim Doyle. Both are content to let Walker try to talk his way out of this himself, as the story continues to circulate and grow.

Earlier Xoff post on the subject.

Friday, July 08, 2005

No surprise. No crime in Schiavo case

No surprise. No evidence of any crime in Terri Schiavo case.

Story.

Earlier post,"Adding insult to injury: Jeb Bush keeps playing politics in Schiavo case."

W stands for more than Washington

This from Taegan Goddard's Political Wire:

Many Democratic fans of the Washington Nationals are buying baseball caps with an alternate "DC" logo instead of the more common cursive "W" because it reminds them of the current occupant of the White House, according to the Washington Post."During the design process, a baseball spokeswoman said, nobody made the connection to a certain political figure, for whom the same 23rd letter of the alphabet is a down-home nickname."

Quote, unquote

"My first thought when I heard - just on a personal basis, when I heard there had been this attack [on London]and I saw the futures this morning, which were really in the tank, I thought, 'Hmmm, time to buy.'"

- Fox News's Brit Hume, 7/7/05

David Sirota has more at the Huffington Post.

Tom Reynolds, a Cicero for our times

Tom Reynolds has come into his own lately. After three years of invisibility in the State Senate, he's started making some noise.

It's not all the kind of noise you'd like to be making as you start to get ready for what could be a tough reelection campaign, and maybe even a primary challenge from another Republican.

Reynolds, an extreme right-winger who ran for Congress repeatedly, and was crushed every time, mobilized his fellow wingnuts to knock off Peggy Rosenzweig in a GOP primary in 2002. She had committed the unpardonable sin of being a little bit moderate.

Reynolds is the guy who refused to hold a hearing on raising the minimum wage and said a lot of people weren't worth more than $5.15 an hour.

He threatened to vote against the state budget because it spent too much money, and was only persuaded to support it after an amendment was added to spend some more money -- $14.6-million a year to give tax credits to people who send their children to private schools or teach them at home. It did not escape notice that Reynolds home schools his own kids, and would personally benefit from the $100 per student tax credit. Spivak & Bice column.

Reynolds insisted he was only doing what's right for parents of non-public school students. But that rings a little hollow in the context of the state budget passed by the Republicans, which will force the layoffs of thousands of public school teachers, increased class sizes, and cuts or elimination of many programs.

But it was enough to get Reynolds' vote, which the GOP needed to pass the budget.

One thing that was surely nagging at him was the fact that Rep. Leah Vukmir, a Wauwatosa Assembly member who is rumored to be thinking about a primary challenge to Reynolds, voted against the budget. So if there is a GOP primary, he's now the big spender. (UPDATE: Vukmir voted against the Assembly budget, but voted for it the second time around, with the changes made by the Senate. What changed her mind? Maybe she is a home-schooler too?)

Even if he survives that, Reynolds is targeted by Democrats as a seat they could win back in 2006. Jim Sullivan, a Wauwatosa alderman, is already running.

I don't know if any of that background helps explain Reynolds' latest idea -- to raise the speed limit to 75 on Wisconsin's freeways and expressways. Might as well make it legal, Reynolds says, because everyone drives that fast anyway.

It's the natural order of the universe. As someone e-mailed to me, that makes Reynolds a modern day Cicero.

If we apply the Reynolds philosophy to Wisconsin state government, I can envision a lot of changes coming in our state laws. If people are already doing it, we might as well legalize it. Why stop with the speed limit? The possibilities are endless.

Scott Jensen is not "innocent"

Yes, I believe in the concept that someone is innocent until proven guilty. Sort of.

Rep. Scott (Scooter) Jensen, the Waukesha Republican who had to step down as Assembly Speaker because of a Capitol scandal, says he is "thankful that my constituents understand that someone is innocent until proven guilty."

I'll bet he is. They've re-elected him twice since he was indicted on felony charges in connection with directing hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to a political fund-raising effort to help Republicans. And he has stalled and stalled in the courts to keep from coming to trial on the charges of misconduct in public office.

It is now almost three years since he was indicted, and Jensen has somewhat redeemed himself in the GOP-run Assembly. As a Joint Finance Committee member, he was a key player in the state budget just passed by the legislature.

But now Scooter has an opponent, a young Democrat who isn't afraid to talk about the trouble Jensen is in.

"If you can't trust them, they can't lead you," 25-year-old Sterling Lynk says, announcing his plan to run against Jensen next year.

The Waukesha County Dem Party chair, Rick Congdon,, had the best line: "If (Jensen) loses (in court), he's a criminal. If he wins, he's going to be the Michael Jackson of Wisconsin politics: You know there's something dirty going on, you just can't put your finger on it."

And that is a point that needs to be made. Whether Scooter is found "not guilty" or not, he is not innocent. He doesn't deny hiring a staffer on the state payroll at a big salary to raise money full-time for Republicans. He just says that was part of his job, and not illegal.

If Jensen ever gets to court -- and I wouldn't bet on it -- his lawyers may find some loophole to allow him to wriggle off the hook.

But that won't make him innocent. Jensen's days of innocence ended years ago. It does appear, however, that he managed to put his conscience to sleep. Otherwise, he'd never be able to argue that he's done nothing wrong, when he clearly has. Just like there is "not guilty" and "innocent," there is "wrong" and "illegal."

Jensen seems to have lost the ability to make those distinctions -- or at least to admit them.

Story on challenger.

Earlier Xoff post: "Just doing our jobs, raising money on taxpayers' tab."

Does the size of your caucus matter?

You show me your caucus and I'll show you mine.

Kevin at Lakeshore Laments,defends Rep. Mark Green's "Victory in Iraq" caucus, which I poked a little fun at in a recent post,"Mark Green wants victory in Iraq."

He notes that the "Victory in Iraq" caucus, although just formed on June 30, has 118 members of Congress signed up, while the "Out of Iraq" caucus, formed earlier, has only 50.

Green started the "Victory in Iraq" caucus as a way "to give he (sic) and his colleagues another avenue to show support for our troops and the good work they are doing in Iraq," his newsletter said.

So it's not just a "victory" caucus; it's also a "support the troops" caucus. If Green called it the Support the Troops caucus, he could have all 535 members of Congress on board.

But some people, like Sen. Russ Feingold, believe the way to show support for our troops is to have a plan and timetable to bring them home and end the revolving door that sends the same men and women back into harm's way again and again.

The numbers in the two caucuses certainly don't reflect public opinion. Here's a question in a Gallup Poll taken within the last 10 days:

"If you had to choose, which do you think is better? For the U.S. to keep a significant number of troops in Iraq until the situation there gets better, even if that takes many years. OR, To set a time-table for removing troops from Iraq and to stick to that timetable regardless of what is going on in Iraq at the time."

UntilSituationBetter 48%
Stick ToTimetable 49%
Unsure 3%


"Do you think George W. Bush does or does not have a clear plan for handling the situation in Iraq?"


Does 38%
Does Not 58%
Unsure 4%


So strength in numbers in the Congress has little to do with anything except the political affiliations of the members of the caucuses. The Republicans who support the President (not just the troops) want to "win."

Numbers have certainly not been any indicator of the correct position to take in U.S. foreign policy in the past. The Gulf of Tonkin resolution, which gave President Lyndon Johnson the authority he used to expand the ground war in Vietnam -- extending the war for years and costing tens of thousands of American lives -- passed the Senate 88-2 in 1964. Many of those 88 came to regret it.

As my new blogger friend Kevin would say, heh.

Thursday, July 07, 2005

Neocon interns support the troops


From WorkingForChange.com Posted by Picasa Click on cartoon to enlarge

Secretly snooping on air passengers

If you flew in June of 2004 the Transportation Security Administration now has a file on you, amassing such passenger records as our names, phone numbers, and credit card info.

Jim Hightower comments on AlterNet.

Graber: A secret caucus is a secret

Republican Party Chairman Rick Graber on his role in putting together the Senate version of the state budget:

Graber refused to discuss what role he was playing, Steve Walters reports on the Journal Sentinel blog. "I never talk about what I tell Senate Republicans in closed caucus," said Graber, who often rips Doyle and Democratic lawmakers for decisions made after closed-door meetings.

That certainly doesn't answer the questions raised in our earlier post, about whether Graber, the president of a major law firm with a government affairs and lobbying practice,is the appropriate person to be twisting arms and wheeling and dealing in secret on the state budget. It still doesn't pass the smell test.

Green voted for vets' health care --

after he voted against it

Is there anyone who doesn't remember the famous John Kerry line, "I voted for the war before I voted against it?"

John Kerry, meet Mark Green, Republican Congressman, candidate for governor, and big-time flip-flopper on veterans issues.

Last week, the House voted to correct a $1 billion shortfall in veterans' health care funding -- a shortfall the White House and House Republicans had insisted didn't exist.

Even then, Rep. Ron Kind pointed out, the amount offered by House Republicans did not match that passed in the Senate, meaning that funds will not get to VA medical facilities and veterans will continue to wait in lines for health care.

VA Secretary Jim Nicholson admitted that the department will need another $1.5 billion to meet health care needs for the next fiscal year, bringing the total shortfall to $2.5 billion.

This comes after repeated attempts by Democrats to take action to solve the problem, while the Republicans played ostrich.

Mark Green voted twice, in roll calls on June 24 and again on June 28, against amendments to provide the needed money for veterans health care. Both were defeated by the GOP majority.

After the Bush Administration acknowledged that it is short $1 billion for covering current needs at the Department of Veterans Affairs this year, the Senate voted unanimously to give the VA an extra $1.5 billion this year to cover the shortfall. But House Republicans offered just $975 million, meaning additional work will have to be done to correct this serious problem.

Over the past two years, Democrats have been standing with America's veterans fighting to increase support for veterans' health care. House Republicans consistently chose other priorities and voted no on veterans' healthcare, leading to a shortfall that did not have to happen.

"The fact that the House is standing here today, debating a fix to a problem that should have never happened, is a real disgrace," said Kind. "At a time of war, the American people want leaders who offer support and services for our veterans and their families, not partisan games and preventable mistakes."

When the House finally woke up and passed the $975-million appropriation, Mark Green voted yes. So did all 418 other members recorded as voting.

So, as he hits the campaign trail for governor, Green will be able to say, while proudly declaring that he supports Victory in Iraq, that "I voted for health care benefits for Iraq veterans -- after I voted against them twice."

Here's a story from the Washington Times, which is not a part of the liberal media conspiracy, on the subject.

And another from The Washington Post, which is.

Scott Walker's ride still kicking up dust

Scott Walker's taxpayer-financed Harley ride through the state's media markets ended last Thursday, when a police escort led him into the Summerfest grounds for the opening of the festival.

But, a week later, the dust hasn't settled. His taxpayer-paid campaign trip, and his handing out of thousands of dollars worth of free goodies to reporters along the way, have prompted some ongoing media stories asking ethical questions.

Some random thoughts:

Walker writes the editor. Walker writes a "screw you" letter to the editor of the Green Bay Press Gazette, the paper which ran the original story about the freebies. "Regardless of my political interests, I will continue to promote tourism in our region." Walker writes. Because of my political interests ... would be more accurate.

The campaign is working, Walker says, noting that a TV crew from another media market was coming to Milwaukee to do a story on the Mitchell Park Domes. Which raises the question -- who do you think took the TV folks on the tour and did the interview to get some face time in another media market? Think it was the person who runs the Domes or the parks superintendent, or Mr. Tourism himself? I don't know the answer, but wanna bet?

Walker's selective memory. Walker told the Press Gazette that he can't understand the fuss, since he did a similar ride last year and no one raised any questions. Two things: He is now an announced candidate for governor, which changes things considerably. And Walker is shading the truth about last year's event. There were at least two open records requests made for information on the trip, including one from the state Democratic Party. Apparently the news media gave him a pass, but that does not mean the trip didn't raise some eyebrows.

Delusions of grandeur? “The only thing that’s changed is that I have announced my intention to seek a different statewide office," Walker told the Press Gazette. "Now it appears, at least for some, the rules have changed since last year. It’s interesting how people are conveniently looking at it differently now.”

A different statewide office? Was he running for some other statewide office last year? Or does he think Milwaukee County executive is a statewide office? Details, please.

No coverage for hometown hero? Since the Press Gazette story, many newspapers around the state have written about the ethical questions surrounding his trip, and there has been an AP story on the wire. Not a peep from the hometown Journal Sentinel, though. Perhaps someone with a better relationship than I have could ask Managing Editor George Stanley about it.

The seal of approval. Walker says everything is fine and has been approved by the county ethics board. Well, I haven't seen this year's letter, but the one in 2004 from John J. Carter, chair of the board, starts by telling Walker, "You have determined this tour to be county business," then goes on to say it's all fine to use taxpayer money, take staff along, and have a jolly good time. If you start from the premise that Walker gets to decide what is county business and what is campaign, it's pretty easy to see how Carter reached his conclusion.

Walker wins chutzpah award. Walker tries to put the best spin on this whole embarrassing episode (it should be embarrassing, but he seems to be shameless) with a press release telling of all the great results of his trip. For example, someone from Rockford came to the zoo! I don't think that's a first, actually. When I lived in Rockford long ago, everyone knew there was a zoo in Milwaukee, and they had never heard of Scott Walker. I think they preferred it that way.

Previous Xoff post,"Walker plays Santa on taxpayers' tab."

UPDATE. Walker's letter to the Press Gazette did not help. The newspaper has run a new story on the subject, and also wrote about another allaged Walker campaign violation pending before the State Elections Board.

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

Dems want Rove to come clean or resign

Rep. John Conyers is circulating a letter to the White House asking that Karl Rove explain his actions in the Valerie Plame affair or resign.

Why not both? Explain AND resign.



Karl Rove

Build a better Bush

Think the President's looks could be improved? Maybe just a little more hair? A little less hair? No hair?

A different smile? Fewer teeth?

The choices are yours, thanks to the miracle of the internet

Just click here to get started.

Rove must not be the leak -- or is he?

While Judith Miller of the New York Times went to jail today rather than reveal a source, contempt charges against Time's Matthew Cooper were dropped after he agreed to testify about his sources.

Cooper said he had been freed from the confidentiality agreement by the source.

That tells me one thing: Cooper's source is not Karl Rove. Can you imagine Rove giving himself up to save anyone? (Or is this damage control because he's about to be exposed anyway? I'm full of questions, aren't I?)

It's probably not George W., either. His self-preservation instincts are so strong he'd let a reporter rot in the hole before he's turn himself in.

Let's see who in the White House takes the fall for outing a CIA agent. Or were there multiple sources?

Story on Poynter Institute journalism website.

Wonkette thinks the opposite:

Of course, we'll have to come up with some backstory as to why Cooper didn't ask his source (Karl Rove) to call him a year ago, back when his source (Karl Rove) signed the written document that released Cooper from keeping the source's (Karl Rove's) identity secret.* Also, why didn't Karl call Judy?** Maybe Karl Rove is just unbelievably cruel! Or maybe he has points on the backend of "The Matt Cooper Story."

Molly Ivins on "Eminent development"

Supreme Court sides with rich vs. poor

Molly Ivins writes:

AUSTIN, Texas -- As one who cares a whale of a lot more about personal rights than property rights, let me leap right into the fray over a Supreme Court decision on the side of the property rights advocates, many of whom I normally consider nutballs. But at least they're more in touch with reality than a majority of the Supreme Court.

Read it here.

Fowl -- as in sea gulls -- foul the beaches

Some Chicagoans are beginning to discover that, although Milwaukee is more fun to blame, the real cause of their beach closing problems is much closer to home.

The Sun Times editorial says, in part:

For years, we've dumped on Milwaukee for befouling the water of Lake Michigan and raising the E. coli bacteria levels in the summer to dangerous highs. It's true that the beer-barreled city to our north has been allowing raw sewage to seep into the lake, particularly after heavy rainstorms. And this sometimes happens in Chicago. But raw sewage is only a small part of why our beaches have been closed two dozen times this season. The real culprits are the gulls.


When UW-Milwaukee's Great Lakes Water Institute released a study showing sea gulls had a lot to do with Milwaukee's beach closings, too, the Milwaukee media laughed at the idea. Later, two of the researchers did a study which found a huge disparity between the causes of beach pollution and what was reported in the media. Milwaukee served as a case study, and the local newspaper got a bad grade. The newspaper reported it, sort of. My earlier post on the subject, "Self-criticism is hard to do."

It's fine to be skeptical. But take a walk along South Shore Beach in Milwaukee, barefoot, and you'll get a better feel for the problem.

Quote, unquote

"CIA chief Porter Goss says he has an "excellent idea" where Osama bin Laden is hiding. That excellent idea: Pakistan. Which narrows it down from what: Asia? The Northern Hemisphere? When this guy loses his keys, where does he start looking? Maryland?"

-- Will Durst, The Progressive.

Welcome, Wisconsin Stem Cell Now

Wisconsin Stem Cell Now, a new non-profit, has joined the effort keep Wisconsin on the cutting edge of stem cell research.

From the website:

Wisconsin Stem Cell Now, Inc. is a not-for-profit corporation fighting on behalf of the millions of Americans in Wisconsin and across the country who are currently suffering from serious debilitating diseases.

Our mission is to:

1. educate the public concerning the promising scientific advances in the field of embryonic stem cell research and

2. advocate on behalf of the public funding of embryonic stem cell research in Wisconsin and other states.

Wisconsin Stem Cell Now, Inc. is a grassroots organization comprised of Wisconsin residents of all backgrounds -- Democrats and Republicans, clergy and lay persons, doctors and patients -- all united in support of advancing scientific research using embryonic stem cells. We believe that this research holds the key to unlocking the cures for heart disease, cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, ALS, macular degeneration, spinal cord injury, MS, lupus, neurological diseases and multiple other life-threatening conditions. Impressive scientific breakthroughs have already been made, but continued public support of this important research is necessary.

Tuesday, July 05, 2005

Mad about mad cows

Mad cow disease still threatens the United States because the government and beef industry have stifled discussion instead of erecting any safeguards -- and Madison's own John Stauber is mad as hell. Well, mad as heck, anyway. Is he so mad he's not gonna take it anymore? Hard to say. But here's how his article starts. Read it all at CommonDreams.org

"A popular Texas bumper sticker reads: "The only mad cow in America is Oprah." Not anymore with the USDA announcing that the first home-grown case of mad cow to be discovered is a Texas beef cow. . . [T]he failure of the United States to take the measures necessary to stop the spread of the fatal dementia dubbed mad cow disease resulted from a successful PR campaign by industry and government that to this day has fooled most of the press and the public into believing that all necessary steps were taken long ago. A major part of the effort to spin and intimidate media coverage involved suing Oprah Winfrey under the Texas Food Disparagement Act after she aired a program April 16, 1996, examining mad cow risks in America."

Nelson's inspiration

Gaylord Nelson had a lifelong relationship with Madison's Capital Times. His parents, Polk County Progressives, subscribed when he was growing up. When he was in law school at the University of Wisconsin, one of the friends he made was Miles McMillin, later to be the editor of the Captital Times, and they remained close friends for four decades.

In Nelson's early days in politics, as a State Senate candidate in 1948, McMillin, then a Cap Times editorial writer, wrote many of Nelson's press releases, which got prominent play in the paper. On one occasion, the newspaper followed up with a critical editorial disagreeing with Nelson about a release he had issued, because legendary Cap Times Publisher William Evjue thought Nelson was wrong.

Nelson complained to McMillin. How could McMillin write an editorial criticizing him when McMillin had written the press release in the first place, Nelson asked.

"Well," McMillin explained, "the Capital Times attacked what you said. I didn't say it."


In any event, here is today's Capital Times editorial, of which McMillin would have approved:

Nelson's Inspiration

Gaylord Nelson was the living link between the Wisconsin progressive movement of the first years of the 20th century and the progressive movement of today.

Through his 89 years, he maintained a faith in the promise of radical reform that he had learned as a youth in Clear Lake, Wis., where his father had been the local campaign manager for U.S. Sen. Robert M. "Fighting Bob" La Follette, the two La Follette sons and a host of progressives.

In one of his last written statements, published in The Capital Times barely two weeks before his death on Sunday, Nelson celebrated the 150th anniversary of Fighting Bob's birth with a warm recollection of how the La Follette tradition inspired his own commitment to public service.

"I never saw Fighting Bob, but one of my early memories is, at age 10, going with my dad to Amery to hear Young Bob give a whistle-stop speech from the back of a railroad car. Dad put me on his shoulders so I could see. I was quite impressed," wrote Nelson. "On the way home, my father asked me whether I thought I might like to go into politics someday. 'I would,' I told him, 'but I'm afraid by then that Bob La Follette may not have left any problems for me to solve.' "

Gaylord Nelson's father recalled the conversation when the younger Nelson was the Democratic candidate for governor in 1958. The elder Nelson asked, "Well, do you think Bob La Follette left enough problems for you to solve?"

Years later, Nelson allowed as how the La Follettes had left enough problems and added, "I did what I could to solve some of them."

To a greater extent than any Wisconsin political figure of the past half century, Nelson set out to address the most difficult challenges of the age.

Elected governor in the midst of a deep recession, Nelson restructured state tax policy so that Wisconsin could continue to be a progressive state: leading the nation in setting high education standards, providing quality social services and maintaining the infrastructure that allowed small farmers and business owners to prosper. But Nelson was just getting started.

It was as a Wisconsin senator, from 1963 to 1981, that he placed an indelible stamp on Wisconsin, the nation and the world. Much is made of the fact that Nelson was the founder of Earth Day and the most aggressive defender of the environment that Congress has seen. Surely, that will be his greatest legacy.

But it is important to remember that Nelson was, as well, the Senate's chief champion of pure food and drug protections. He was a fierce defender of civil rights and civil liberties who played a pivotal role in preventing Richard Nixon from packing the Supreme Court with Southern segregationists. And he was a courageous foe of the Vietnam War and U.S. military adventuring abroad.

Nothing sums up Nelson's commitment to the progressive ideal better than the fact that, when he left the Senate as the chamber's most popular member, he did not choose to become a corporate lobbyist. Instead, he went to work as a full-time environmentalist, aligning himself with the Wilderness Society and criticizing Democrats and Republicans who slipped in their commitment to protect the planet.

As such, Nelson carried the baton of Wisconsin progressivism - with its core value of putting principle above politics - into the 21st century.

He joked that "in the La Follette tradition, I also left some problems for my successors to solve." And that is surely true. But with his unwavering faith in the ability of people to set the politicians straight - which was so beautifully illustrated by the Earth Day initiative - he provided us with the model for tackling those problems.

We honor Gaylord Nelson's memory best by using that model to carry on with the progressive tradition that he so admired - and so truly embodied.

Walker plays Santa on taxpayers' tab

This Green Bay Press Gazette story, headlined "Walker offers press a free ride," certainly raises some interesting questions.

We've already asked, in previous posts, whether Walker's statewide Harley ride, visiting every media market, is nothing more than an ill-disguised campaign trip. The answer, of course, is yes, although somehow Walker has smooth-talked the ethics and elections board folks -- otherwise known as the toothless tigers -- and convinced them otherwise.

"Just promoting Milwaukee County," Walker says, and the ethics and elections boards say, "Have a nice trip, Mr. Walker. No problem that you're doing it all at taxpayer expense and even taking along several highly-paid people who work for you." (Did they get overtime or comp time for the weekend?)

"No matter that most of the questions you get and most of the stories about your trip are about the governor's race, not the Milwaukee Mile. Not your fault if the media wants to talk about the "wrong" stuff, is it? "

(From the Press Gazette story: "During his stop in Green Bay, Walker told a Press-Gazette reporter that he was there to promote Milwaukee and not to comment on his candidacy for governor. After clarifying his position, he then answered questions about the gubernatorial campaign.)

So, what better way to promote Milwaukee County than to drop $500 worth of free tickets on the reporter who's interviewing you?

No problem, apparently, unless it's Karen Michel at the Press-Gazette, who asks embarrassing questions in print and says things like:

"When Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker let his staff give journalists more than $500 worth of complimentary tickets to Milwaukee attractions last week, political watchdogs say the gubernatorial candidate also gave the public a free pass to debate his ethical conduct."

“We’ve done this for two years now and nobody had a problem with it; nobody raised a concern,” Walker said in a telephone interview Friday. “The only thing that’s changed is that I have announced my intention to seek a different statewide office. Now it appears, at least for some, the rules have changed since last year. It’s interesting how people are conveniently looking at it differently now.”

Actually, what's amazing is that no one asked the question before. Walker wasn't an announced candidate for governor last year, but he was certainly running.

But even if they gave him a pass last year and took him at face value -- "Just promoting Milwaukee, ma'am" -- it is different now, whether Walker understands that or not. When you become an active candidate, the rules change.

One of the interesting questions this story raises is: What were journalists in other media markets around the state thinking when Walker distributed his largesse -- free tickets to the zoo, state fair, Milwaukee Mile race, art museum, and more? Did they just pocket the loot? Did anyone see anything questionable about it?

There does not appear to be much reason to file a complaint, since the ethics and elections boards already have given Walker a pass.

But if this isn't against the rules, it is time to change the rules.

Monday, July 04, 2005

Bush popularity rating: Not so hot

"Not so hot" is one of those technical terms that survey research people use.

They love him in Utah, but George W. Bush is almost friendless in Vermont, according to the latest tabulation from Survey USA.

When you rank the states according to Bush's popularity, Wisconsin comes in tied for 37th, with 40% favorable and 57% unfavorable. Notable is that Ohio, which Bush won to claim the 2004 Electoral College victory, gives him the exact same numbers as Wisconsin.

And Nevada, which Bush won, is #41. Maybe they should quit picking on Sen. Harry Reid.

The list.

Quote, unquote

"One of the things I like to say about the leader’s job is that it is somewhat similar to being the groundskeeper at a cemetery: There are a lot of people under you, but no one ever listens."

-- Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN), quoted in Roll Call.

"Spain, will you marry me?"

With great wine, flamenco, progressive politicians, and now gay marriage, Spain is surpassing France as the coolest European country by far.

Raachel Neumann on Spain's latest action, on Alternet

More Gaylord Nelson tributes

I'll just let others speak today about Gaylord and what he meant to Wisconsin and the world:

Journal Sentinel:"Nelson recalled as a pal among pols"

Journal Sentinel editorial:"A champion for Wisconsin and the environment"

Wisconsin State Journal:"Gaylord Nelson, 1916-2005: Wisconsin giant dies"

Green Bay Press Gazette:"Nelson’s conservation legacy endures in Wisconsin"

EarthTimes.org "Wisconsin's environment champion, Gaylord Nelson dies"

Reuters."Earth Day founder Gaylord Nelson dead at 89"

Chicago Tribune:"Gaylord Nelson 1916-2005, Wisconsin ex-Senator, Earth Day founder"

LA Times:"Gaylord Nelson, 89; Champion of Environment Started Earth Day"

Sunday, July 03, 2005

Gaylord A. Nelson, 1916-2005

I’ve written hundreds of thousands of words about Gaylord Nelson, but I don’t feel like writing much today.

Gaylord Nelson had an enormous, lasting impact on Wisconsin politics and on the worldwide environmental movement. He leaves a huge legacy. But for all his accomplishments, at heart he still remained a small-town boy from Wisconsin who couldn’t quite believe this was all happening to him. He never lost that small-town civility and charm, and a genuine interest in people, which is what made him so endearing and also made him so successful in politics.

He was a great man and a remarkable, extraordinary, wonderful human being. I feel lucky and privileged to be the one to write his biography and, in the process, to get to know and become friends with Gaylord, his wife, Carrie Lee, and their family.

I miss him already.


Others write about him:

Washington Post.

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, by longtime Nelson friend Frank Aukofer.

The Capital Times.

New York Times.

Saturday, July 02, 2005

Death toll in Iraq hits states big and small

As we celebrate Independence Day, it is an appropriate time to recognize the sacrifices being made by American men and women in the ongoing war in Iraq, with no end in sight.

Wisconsin, which has mourned the loss of 40 of its citizens in the Iraq war, ranks 16th among the 50 states in the number of deaths per capita, a new report says.

California, the most populous state in the nation, has suffered the most casualties, 161. But on a per capita basis, tiny Vermont has borne the biggest burden, with 11 casualties, or 1.77 for every 100,000 residents of Vermont.

Stateline.org story and chart.

List of Wisconsin casualties

Latest Iraq casualty count.

Friday, July 01, 2005

Putting Green on the spot

You gotta love it.

Rep. Mark Green has been slipping and sliding all around the Social Security privatization issue for months, refusing to take a position. He's running for governor, you see, and knows the voters disagree with him about Republican plans to deform the system.

But Congress is home for the 4th of July recess, and Green is appearing in as many parades as he can.

So the state Democratic Party, with a straight face, has put out press releases to the news media around the state, alerting them that Green will be in their area "to discuss his position on the privatization of Social Security."

Sample release: "Congressman Mark Green, who has been sent home to Wisconsin for the Fourth of July recess with instructions to sell the GOP Social Security reform plan, will be available to reporters and citizens at Independence Day Parades in Manawa, Oshkosh, Wautoma, and Princeton tomorrow, Saturday, July 2, 2005 to discuss his position on the privatization of Social Security."

A list of his schedule for the particular area is included in each release. In case you'd like to ask him his position, here you go:

SATURDAY, JULY 2

10:30 a.m. – 12:00 Manawa Rodeo Parade

1:00 – 2:00 p.m. Sawdust Days, Menominee Park, Oshkosh

3:00 – 4:00 p.m. Wautoma 4th of July Celebration Parade

5:00 – 6:00 p.m. Princeton Independence Day Parade

SUNDAY, JULY 3

12:00 – 1:00 p.m. Marinette Independence Day Parade

7:00 – 8:00 p.m. Menomonee Falls Parade

MONDAY, JULY 4, 2005

9:00 – 10:00 a.m. Oak Creek Independence Day Parade

11:00 a.m. – 12:00 Franklin Independence Day Parade

12:30 – 1:00 p.m. New Berlin Independence Day Parade

2:00 – 3:00 p.m. Hartford Independence Day Parade

Starving the schools to death

The Florence School Board has voted to close its schools and sell its assets because it doesn't have enough money to continue operating. AP story.

The Republican strategy of squeezing local schools between revenue caps and inadequate state funding has claimed an entire school district. It's a graphic example of what conservative strategists mean when they proclaim they will "starve the beast." Without revenue, governmental units (the metaphorical beast), including schools, cannot function.

The budget passed by the GOP-run legislature will drastically slash state support for Wisconsin's public schools. For the tiny Florence district, it would cut $305,000 over the next two years. List by district.

Starving the beast is no longer an extremist fantasy. The first victims are the children in Florence.

Who is next? It could well be the surrounding school districts that will have to absorb the children from Florence. Some of the nearby districts have only a few hundred students.

Putting even 100 of Florence's 600 students into another little district, while the receiving district waits three years for the mechanisms of the state school funding system to respond to the increase in costs, will put pressure on the receiving district to close.

The superintendents in the Florence area anticipate a domino effect if Florence goes through with this. Then what's next?

Republican Gov. vetoes stem cell ban

From the Cincinnatti Enquirer:

DAYTON - Gov. Bob Taft vetoed a ban on stem cell research Thursday, defying Republicans in the legislature and outraging social conservatives.

The veto came as Taft signed a two-year, $51 billion budget at a factory here, a location he picked to symbolize his efforts to revive the state's economy.

As part of that effort, Taft hopes to offer voters a high-tech jobs initiative in the fall called the "Third Frontier." But state legislators, in the final budget negotiations, inserted a provision declaring that no Third Frontier money could be used for stem cell research.

That, Taft worried, could make the initiative harder to pass, because the stem cell restrictions went too far.

Graber: the inspirational deal-maker,

or top gun without a license to lobby?

Is it just me, or does something strike you as unusual about this report from the WisPolitics budget blog:

Schultz: "We've Got the Votes"


Senate Majority Leader Dale Schultz, headed into the office of Assembly Speaker John Gard shortly after noon with Republican Party of Wisconsin chairman Rick Graber at his side, says the Senate is ready to pass the budget bill. "We've got the votes," he said, shortly before briefing Assembly Republican leadership on the amendment package his caucus created to reach the magic number of 17 votes.

The Richland Center Republican declined to talk about the details of the package, saying he didn't have his notes. "I'd say we're all a little unhappy, and that's a sign we have a good compromise," Schultz said.

Graber was in caucus with the Senate Republicans this morning. Schultz called him an "inspirational figure" in helping reach a compromise.


Rick Graber, state Republican chairman, was the inspiration for the budget compromise?

Not that there's anything wrong with that, as Seinfeld might say -- or is there?

What is Graber's role in the grand scheme of things, aside from being the inspirational party attack dog and ankle biter?

He's not registered as a lobbyist. But his law firm certainly lobbies. And his biography on the firm's website describes his work as follows below. See if it sounds at all like lobbying to you, or whether his client list includes anyone who might have a stake in the budget (bold face emphasis mine):

"Richard Graber is a director and President and Chief Executive Officer of the firm and a member of the Business Law and Government Relations Departments. Rick draws his clients from a variety of industries, including paper manufacturing, automotive, lighting, transportation, media, publishing, petroleum, moving and storage, financial institutions and higher education.

"Rick provides creative counsel and strategic help to his business clients on matters including mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, corporate governance and reorganization, executive compensation and corporate succession. He uses his knowledge and experience of government to help clients negotiate government contracts and to provide legislative solutions which stimulate the economy and help businesses to thrive ."

For a major law firm with a government affairs practice to have its president be the only non-legislator in the room for final budget negotiations -- priceless.

The secret budget -- Does anyone care?

Charlie Sykes asks about the budget:

THURSDAY, June 30, 2005, 4:24 p.m.

BEHIND CLOSED DOORS

Am I the only one who's bothered by the fact that this all takes place in secret?


No, Charlie, there are two of us. I've tried to sound the alarms at different points in the process, when Republicans met by conference call, when Joint Finance members shuffled in and out of meetings in a "walking quorum," and when decisions were hammered out in secret caucuses.

I sent some of those comments to editorial writers around the state, to see if that could provoke anything. No luck.

No one seems to mind -- not the newspapers, not the Democrats, not the taxpayers.

Just you and me, Charlie. The odd couple, standing up for what's right, and fighting together for truth, justice and the American way. Kind of gives you shivers, doesn't it?

Quote, unquote

"It's not a pay raise. It's an adjustment so that they're not losing their purchasing power."

-- House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX), quoted by the AP, on a vote to increase congressional salaries by $3,100 next year, to $165,200.