Senate Members


Co-Chair: Mark Miller, D-Monona

Democratic members
- Dave Hansen, D-Green Bay
- Julie Lassa, D-Stevens Point
- John Lehman, D-Racine
- Judy Robson, D-Beloit
- Lena Taylor, D-Milwaukee

Republican members
- Alberta Darling, R-River Hills
- Luther Olsen, R-Ripon

Assembly Members


Co-Chair: Mark Pocan, D-Madison

Democratic members
- Pedro Colón, D-Milwaukee
- Tamara Grigsby, D-Milwaukee
- Cory Mason, D-Racine
- Gary Sherman, D-Port Wing
- Jennifer Shilling, D-La Crosse

Republican members
- Robin Vos, R-Racine
- Phil Montgomery, R-Ashwaubenon

- Department of Administration
- Department of Revenue
- Joint Finance Committee
- Legislative Fiscal Bureau
-- LFB Budget Memos

Tuesday, May 24, 2005

 10:44 AM 

Filibusters and Positioning

The battle line for thematic control of the US Senate has been drawn. It’s Bill Frist vs. John McCain and the one of them will win the Republican nomination in 2008.

For the casual observer, the recent McCain-led compromise to avert the Nuclear Option proposed by Bill Frist – changing Senate rules on filibustering judicial nominees – might seem as a rational move towards comity. As recent polls indicate more than half the country has a negative opinion of Congress, 7 Republicans joined with 7 Democrats to demonstrate that the people’s business can get done in Washington.

What a crock.

The real story is how the Republican presidential primaries have begun; not in cornfields or snow drifts but rather, in the comfy confines of the US Senate Chambers.

The coalition of middle-of-the-road US Senators was a deliberate strategy by McCain to wrestle the leadership mantel from Frist. McCain is keenly aware who his audience is – the Mainstream Media – and he exploits it to maximum success.

Frist could press forward for the social conservatives he has been religiously courting by ignoring the media love-fest for McCain -- simply keep calling for an up-or-down vote on all judicial nominees.

Ignoring the sound bite of the day and fighting the good fight was the hallmark of Newt (another 2008 Presidential aspirant). But Frist has term-limited himself and as his Senate tenure ends in 2006, he needs to exploit his bully-pulpit during the days he has left.

The final analysis is the agreement is a win, win, win;

Win for McCain;
He continues to stroke the persona of being partinsanly ambiguous.
Win for Frist;
He collects chips among the social conservatives for his 2008 White House run.
Win for the White House;
Bush gets the 3 most conservative judges of the 7 nominees.

1 Comments:

At 2:37 PM, Blogger James Wigderson said...

How is this a win for any of them? The nominating base of the party, the conservatives, will not trust McCain. This fiasco only hurts him more. The conservatives will remember Frist's leadership failure to control and use a 56 member majority to advance their cause. And the President (if the reports in National review are accurate)loses four nominees without a fight: Saad, Myers, Kavanaugh and Haynes.

 

Post a Comment

<< Back to Budget Blog main page

Greg Bump

Contact: bump@wispolitics.com

Updates on Joint Finance Committee action on the Wisconsin state budget, from the first JFC meetings through the governor's final vetoes.

Site feed (RSS)

Powered by Blogger



A production of WisPolitics Publishing.